"Entering to Charlie", Why is it locked ?

[KittleRox 2,147]

Sounder; take the U.S., Australia, New Zealand for example. They have their Anti's trying to destroy hunting as a sport, but they still have websites, magazines and even T.V. programmes dedicated to hunting !! If we roll over and stop posting LEGAL pictures and stories of hunting exploits, the anti's will have won ! They will take our refusal to post LEGAL subjects as some sort of admission that we are in the wrong !! If the Anti's want to use incriminating pictures to harm us, they can pull them from many places on the web, not just this site ! If we post pics of hunting, we have to make sure we let the reader know that what is posted is LEGAL !! WE CAN'T JUST DO THE ANTI'S JOB FOR THEM BY STOPPING POSTING.

 

Cheers..

alot of legals in there charti, can you not see though that by posting pics of dead foxes, deer etc backed up with daft comments from the halfwits its giving the anti brigade ammo, to be quite honest I can,t see the point of putting these pics up, look a dead fox, oh look another dead fox, what sort of decent hunting man really wants to look at these type of pictures day in day oot ? not me

 

Of course I can see that posts by halfwits with daft comments can hurt us; but where have I advocated or supported that ??? !!! I was replying to Sounder who suggested we dont post any pics or stories, EVEN IF THEY ARE FROM ABROAD, WHERE IT IS TOTALY LEGAL !! As for the comment about "decent hunting" men wanting to see these pics, I think you'll find there are many who want to see a decent post, with pics, relating to something they can't do legaly in their own country, and may never have the chance of doing abroad.

 

Cheers.

you,re making some very valid points there charti, and why are they valid, because of the way in which you have written your point of view and thats the point I,m trying to make,

most of the posts on this site with a few exceptions about hunting fox, deer aren,t well written and are an embarrasment to field sports

 

which brings me to another question,

 

why don,t the mods who have obviously done a bit and are well schooled in making the subject genuinely interesting post some informative interesting stuff and by doing this help create a more enjoyable site for everyone ?

why why mods mods f**k mods the mods are stopping this why that the rules of the forum we don't make them, so your saying now that the mod need to post,????

I,m not saying the mods have to do anything but surely if they want to improve the site they must give a damn about it and could contribute some interesting stuff ?

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

To improve members writing how about IanB supplying

 

Might improve some of the grammer

 

So not to offend edited

Edited August 29, 2012 by cookiemonsterandmerlin

[Millet 4,497]

What are those yellow key's for cookie..

[Marvin 193]

for when you sing "Old MacDonald had a farm a e i o u" :whistling:

[KittleRox 2,147]

for when you sing "Old MacDonald had a farm a e i o u" :whistling:

and on that farm he had a combine a e i o u "

[mongoose 39]

So when you were hunting with the hounds before the ban you only hunt a fox that is causing a problem....

 

Hunting and killing are two very different pastimes

All I'm saying is that running a lurcher single handed against a fox was fair sport just like hunting a fox is, what you said about about knowing if it is the problem fox is rubbish, else what would be the point of you taking your terriers on a hunt day as when they mark you can't tell me you know which fox is in their....

[Guest Leveller]

Might improve some of the grammer

 

Do you mean grammar? :laugh:

[nothernlite 18,080]

To improve members writing how about IanB supplying

 

Might improve some of the grammer

THAT NICE OF YOU AS IF PEOPLE WITH DYSLEXIA HAVENT GOT ENOUGH TO COPE WITH OUR IDIOTS LIKE YOU MAKING THEM FEEL WORSE NOT FUNNY

[long dogs 580]

To improve members writing how about IanB supplying

 

Might improve some of the grammer

THAT NICE OF YOU AS IF PEOPLE WITH DYSLEXIA HAVENT GOT ENOUGH TO COPE WITH OUR IDIOTS LIKE YOU MAKING THEM FEEL WORSE NOT FUNNY

i agree picking disabled folk

[sounder 9]

Sounder; take the U.S., Australia, New Zealand for example. They have their Anti's trying to destroy hunting as a sport, but they still have websites, magazines and even T.V. programmes dedicated to hunting !! If we roll over and stop posting LEGAL pictures and stories of hunting exploits, the anti's will have won ! They will take our refusal to post LEGAL subjects as some sort of admission that we are in the wrong !! If the Anti's want to use incriminating pictures to harm us, they can pull them from many places on the web, not just this site ! If we post pics of hunting, we have to make sure we let the reader know that what is posted is LEGAL !! WE CAN'T JUST DO THE ANTI'S JOB FOR THEM BY STOPPING POSTING.

 

Cheers..

alot of legals in there charti, can you not see though that by posting pics of dead foxes, deer etc backed up with daft comments from the halfwits its giving the anti brigade ammo, to be quite honest I can,t see the point of putting these pics up, look a dead fox, oh look another dead fox, what sort of decent hunting man really wants to look at these type of pictures day in day oot ? not me

 

Of course I can see that posts by halfwits with daft comments can hurt us; but where have I advocated or supported that ??? !!! I was replying to Sounder who suggested we dont post any pics or stories, EVEN IF THEY ARE FROM ABROAD, WHERE IT IS TOTALY LEGAL !! As for the comment about "decent hunting" men wanting to see these pics, I think you'll find there are many who want to see a decent post, with pics, relating to something they can't do legaly in their own country, and may never have the chance of doing abroad.

 

Cheers.

you,re making some very valid points there charti, and why are they valid, because of the way in which you have written your point of view and thats the point I,m trying to make,

most of the posts on this site with a few exceptions about hunting fox, deer aren,t well written and are an embarrasment to field sports

 

which brings me to another question,

 

why don,t the mods who have obviously done a bit and are well schooled in making the subject genuinely interesting post some informative interesting stuff and by doing this help create a more enjoyable site for everyone ?

why why mods mods f**k mods the mods are stopping this why that the rules of the forum we don't make them, so your saying now that the mod need to post,????

I,m not saying the mods have to do anything but surely if they want to improve the site they must give a damn about it and could contribute some interesting stuff ?

well i always get afew post up .. but this thread is not about the mods !!!!!!!!!!!

sounder

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

Might improve some of the grammer

 

Do you mean grammar? :laugh:

 

Just seeing who went to skool

[paulus 26]

So when you were hunting with the hounds before the ban you only hunt a fox that is causing a problem....

 

Hunting and killing are two very different pastimes

All I'm saying is that running a lurcher single handed against a fox was fair sport just like hunting a fox is, what you said about about knowing if it is the problem fox is rubbish, else what would be the point of you taking your terriers on a hunt day as when they mark you can't tell me you know which fox is in their....

sport thats the the problem not pest control, not tradition

[South hams hunter 8,921]

A fox hunt isn't fair leveller but that's a different debate

[Guest long-tail]

To improve members writing how about IanB supplying

 

Might improve some of the grammer

wahts it sey

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

To improve members writing how about IanB supplying

 

Might improve some of the grammer

THAT NICE OF YOU AS IF PEOPLE WITH DYSLEXIA HAVENT GOT ENOUGH TO COPE WITH OUR IDIOTS LIKE YOU MAKING THEM FEEL WORSE NOT FUNNY

 

You talking to one thanks no need to shout .

 

ATB Cookie