MUZZLES.ON.LURCHERS,LAW.

[ferret features 289]

Out walking th dogs earlier on and a jeep pulls in with the local gesstapo on board.th first idiot gets out machine gun in hand while the others took up firing positions.him..why have you not got muzzles on them dogs,,,me thier lurchers they dont need muzzled their mongrels,,whos right.

[danny300 2,240]

as far as i know its greyhounds that have to be muzzled and not lurchers

[graham4877 1,181]

Out walking th dogs earlier on and a jeep pulls in with the local gesstapo on board.th first idiot gets out machine gun in hand while the others took up firing positions.him..why have you not got muzzles on them dogs,,,me thier lurchers they dont need muzzled their mongrels,,whos right.

what the f**k were you doing for that???

[j1985 1,984]

Where the f**k do you live, Iraq ??

 

Machine guns for lurchers ??

[Hitcher 297]

you all seem surprised your lucky you wernt tasered first

[ferret features 289]

Where the f**k do you live, Iraq ??

 

Machine guns for lurchers ??

R.DOYNE.ALL COPS AR HEAVILY ARMED .AT ALL TIMES.GOOGLE HOLY CROSS SCHOOL.in between times whos right do lurchers need to be muzzled any advice .

[graham4877 1,181]

you all seem surprised your lucky you wernt tasered first

sounds fun that!!

remind me of when i made a stung gun ,, and tried it on myself.. just about shit and pissed myself..for real.. and that was last time i tried that :laugh:

[Hitcher 297]

no as long as you dont mention greyhound in the mix

[danny300 2,240]

no as long as you dont mention greyhound in the mix

think it was just ff they were after Edited July 28, 2012 by danny300

[Hitcher 297]

no as long as you dont mention greyhound in the mix

think it was just ff they were after

he be at the docter in the morning

[Irish Lurcher 1,013]

as some lurchers have bull in them, they could have got the breed wrong,,

[ferret features 289]

no as long as you dont mention greyhound in the mix

think it was just ff they were after

he be at the docter in the morning

CLAIMMMMMMMMMMMMM.

[Chid 6,685]

Greyhound or greyhound type dogs (so could include lurchers) have to be muzzled while walking in public places and you can only be in control of 2 at a time

 

[paulus 26]

it all comes down from old law and the need to comply with this and new acts

Under the Town Police Clauses Act of 1847 it is an offence for any person in any street: to let an unmuzzled ferocious dog be at large so that it obstructs or annoys the residents or passengers in the street or puts them in danger; or to set on or to urge any dog to attack, worry or put in fear any person or animal. A dog will not be at large while it is held on a lead. The word 'street' here is given an extended meaning to include any road, square, court, alley, thoroughfare or public passage.

 

In the Metropolitan Police District a similar offence has been created by the Metropolitan Police Act of 1839. This differs only from the first part of the 1847 Act offence in that it is sufficient that an unmuzzled dog be at large (no obstruction, annoyance or danger need be shown), and that the place of the offence is described as any thoroughfare or public place.

 

Under the Dogs Act 1871, any person may make a complaint to a magistrates court that a dog is dangerous, or report the matter to the police. If the court is satisfied that a dog is dangerous and not kept under proper control, it may make an order for it to be controlled or destroyed.

 

The Animals Act 1971 provides that the keeper of an animal is liable for any damage it causes, if he knows it was likely to cause such damage or injury unrestrained.

[Chid 6,685]

Paulus ... In northern Ireland it comes under the control of greyhounds act of 1950

And it includes greyhounds whippets and lurchers or any of there crosses .

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/apni/1950/13/contents

Link to the act