Not guilty!

[Waz 4,266]

A case based almost intirley on 8 hairs that turned up in an r.s.p.c.a evidence bag (despite being a police prosecution? ) as actuall evidence.

 

Hmmmm

 

Not like they are a stranger to perverting the course of justice.

[spade 224]

Hope they sue the ass off the arsepca/police. If only one of the sporting organisations would use this to kick start a media campaign showing the majority use their dogs for legitimate pest control.

[long dogs 580]

Great news.

[bobby blackheart 1,209]

good news that-Anyone who works dogs should have Clive's number in your phone.

[long dogs 580]

good news that-Anyone who works dogs should have Clive's number in your phone.

I aggree

[baldockbanks courser 598]

From the defendents who are all paid up members of the c.s.a could i please thank the alliance for distancing them selves from the case due to it being associated with badgers and Lurcher and terrier men thank you for hanging them out to dry, I find it hard to beleive youd take the same approach to a registered fox pack accused under the hunting act, I don't think you'll be getting your renawel fee next year!!!!

 

All costs incurred including the defence case bar 1 of the defendants who was granted legal aid has to be paid for by the losing Prosection side, which in turn is payed for by the tax payer.

 

The open back 4 x 4 was 1 of the defendants, which was registered to his own tree surgery company, preventing him carrying out any off road work all winter losing many jobs owing to this.

 

The question of compensation will be asked, not least for placing there family's and property at risk with In accurate news paper reports that repeatedly used the phrase badger baiting.

 

I also Noted the lack of animal rights scum at the court case, cowards don't fancy picking on terrier and Lurcher men like they do with organised hunts.

[thedogman199 51]

Wow I was just about to renew my countryside alliance membership they can go and f**k um selvs now, atb lads I'm well Chuffed for them justice has been done at long last, the rspca should be riped for every penny they have

[simonrocco 175]

good result atb

[events co-ordinator 353]

Sacs are the only organisation that provides legal fees insurance for all their members and have a member of the Scottish Workiing Terrier club on their management comittee he provides advice to solicitors on the vallidity of "evidence" provided by the cpS/Fiscals office. In an emergency pm me.

[deck 35]

From the defendents who are all paid up members of the c.s.a could i please thank the alliance for distancing them selves from the case due to it being associated with badgers and Lurcher and terrier men thank you for hanging them out to dry, I find it hard to beleive youd take the same approach to a registered fox pack accused under the hunting act, I don't think you'll be getting your renawel fee next year!!!!

 

All costs incurred including the defence case bar 1 of the defendants who was granted legal aid has to be paid for by the losing Prosection side, which in turn is payed for by the tax payer.

 

The open back 4 x 4 was 1 of the defendants, which was registered to his own tree surgery company, preventing him carrying out any off road work all winter losing many jobs owing to this.

 

The question of compensation will be asked, not least for placing there family's and property at risk with In accurate news paper reports that repeatedly used the phrase badger baiting.

 

I also Noted the lack of animal rights scum at the court case, cowards don't fancy picking on terrier and Lurcher men like they do with organised hunts.

if thats the case then f**k the c s a they should of given these guys some support being paid up members,the very time you need them they desert you Edited June 16, 2012 by deck

[redtailhawk1 84]

Very good result

[fish 148]

From the defendents who are all paid up members of the c.s.a could i please thank the alliance for distancing them selves from the case due to it being associated with badgers and Lurcher and terrier men thank you for hanging them out to dry, I find it hard to beleive youd take the same approach to a registered fox pack accused under the hunting act, I don't think you'll be getting your renawel fee next year!!!!

 

All costs incurred including the defence case bar 1 of the defendants who was granted legal aid has to be paid for by the losing Prosection side, which in turn is payed for by the tax payer.

 

The open back 4 x 4 was 1 of the defendants, which was registered to his own tree surgery company, preventing him carrying out any off road work all winter losing many jobs owing to this.

 

The question of compensation will be asked, not least for placing there family's and property at risk with In accurate news paper reports that repeatedly used the phrase badger baiting.

 

I also Noted the lack of animal rights scum at the court case, cowards don't fancy picking on terrier and Lurcher men like they do with organised hunts.

good post bud.very true

[tinytiger 840]

Represented by Clive Rees but he couldn't attend in person ( very complicated ).

 

4 day trial and a took 7 months to get to court.

 

Costs include helicopter, impoundment of a four wheel drive truck for 7 months ( est £5000+) police occumpanied raids by r.s.p.c.a on 3 seperate houses, legal fees, reports and investigations from so called Badger expert Mr Cantwelll from Naturall England. Wages for 3 police officers who sat in the public gallery for 3 days in uniform after giving evidence and being free to leave court.

 

All payed for by the British tax payer.

 

A case based almost intirley on 8 hairs that turned up in an r.s.p.c.a evidence bag (despite being a police prosecution? ) as actuall evidence.

Planted hairs???

[bullcrossblue 37]

good to hear

[Carraghs Gem 1,675]

Brilliant I hope they sue the arsepca and pigs for every penny and a ton more.