trigger2 3,137 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 they really are a bunch of TOSSERS. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
spade 224 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Shame someone can't have them charged over destroying badger sets Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fireman 10,869 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 National Trust did the same with Stonehenge,it was given to them on 3 conditions,no one builds within a set distsnce,never charge more than a shilling for entry and no one is even refused entry.Do you really think they'd not cash anything in for profit to keep dead folks happy?. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RubyTex 1,957 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hate the robbing twats, i wouldn't leave them a penny, sooner pass the land on to a shooting school or something for the young uns than the rspca. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BORDERSCOT 3,816 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 A big bit of my local permission has just been sold for development and the secretary of state has given approval to get on with the building, however the place holds at least 2 active badger setts and more get opened up every year by the young boars leaving a big old main sett a 1/4 of a mile away.......now not many people know about these setts and I don't think it was brought up in the petition to stop the building. Does anyone know the law where this is concerned, are builders allowed to interfere with these setts......we are talking about a proposed 650 house estate? .. i think permission can be granted to relocate the setts ,from who im not sure maybe defra it has been done on big developments before and ££££££££££££££ talk Spot on. It always seems that big developers can get it done no matter how many badgers are on the land, but if you're someone who has got a small bit of land somewhere with a single set that's stopping you doing a bit for yourself you're told to forget it, no chance.. Unfortunately, that's the way life works - the small man gets it shoved up his arse from all angles - but the big and all powerful - who do all the shoving get what they want...heard David Cameron on TV this morning sayin he understands what it feels like - ie job losses/less income/prices rising...does he really? Does/do he/they f**k!!!!! Come the revoloution eh? Better not suggest starting one online tho eh? You'd get 5 years for that!!!! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 A big bit of my local permission has just been sold for development and the secretary of state has given approval to get on with the building, however the place holds at least 2 active badger setts and more get opened up every year by the young boars leaving a big old main sett a 1/4 of a mile away.......now not many people know about these setts and I don't think it was brought up in the petition to stop the building. Does anyone know the law where this is concerned, are builders allowed to interfere with these setts......we are talking about a proposed 650 house estate? .. i think permission can be granted to relocate the setts ,from who im not sure maybe defra it has been done on big developments before and ££££££££££££££ talk Spot on. It always seems that big developers can get it done no matter how many badgers are on the land, but if you're someone who has got a small bit of land somewhere with a single set that's stopping you doing a bit for yourself you're told to forget it, no chance.. Unfortunately, that's the way life works - the small man gets it shoved up his arse from all angles - but the big and all powerful - who do all the shoving get what they want...heard David Cameron on TV this morning sayin he understands what it feels like - ie job losses/less income/prices rising...does he really? Does/do he/they f**k!!!!! Come the revoloution eh? Better not suggest starting one online tho eh? You'd get 5 years for that!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 (edited) The more these cases are highlighted the better...they enjoy a charitible status but there's nothing charitible about them....greedy corupt with a huge propaganda machine...they kill more animals in a year than hunters do in a lifetime....remove the royal seal of approval and let them stand on their own feet. Edited April 29, 2012 by undisputed Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 why oh why is any one suprized at the actions of the arsepca they are lacs simple as that they are political , they do not care for animals they process them , they are inching towards their target every year to be the the goverment experts on animal welfare , they will be called on more and more as cuts set in the police will press for more power for them to cut down of police presence during enqirys involving the general public , , , they are a beard for the lacs end of 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
reddawn 2,173 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 i know of 3 active setts that were destroyed in my local area when new housing went up Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Fenrisulven 0 Posted April 29, 2012 Report Share Posted April 29, 2012 Judging by the comments on the Daily Mail article the RSPCA have upset a lot of people! The SHG ( http://the-shg.org/ ) have a petition for a charities ombudsman to try and stop this kind of thing from happening and hopefully to try and bring the RSPCA under some sort of control. If you think you can support it please sign and share: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/645 Create a Charities Ombudsman This petition calls on the government to create a Charities Ombudsman with the power to deal with complaints about charities and the authority to order a charity to provide adequate redress if a complaint is upheld.. The Charity Commission is unable to get involved in a wide range of complaints because they are not within its remit. If a complainant is dissatisfied with the outcome of a Charity's own internal complaints procedure their only remaining option is the legal system. With legal aid being cut drastically this is beyond the reach of the majority of people. Many charities are now running services or even acting as law enforcement agencies, so it is important that they are seen to be properly regulated and to have an effective and objective independent external complaints procedure. We want Parliament to debate this issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ratreeper 441 Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 I am ashamed to say my mrs used to give these fuckers £10 a month, it took me a while to change her mind but I will be making sure she reads this. She admits they do wrong but also do a lot of good which I cannot deny, but my argument is that they PTS a much higher % than any of the small charities scraping by on a few beans and hard work so if the millions they spent on ridiculous legal fees etc went to proper charities then the nations pets would all be better off. I am getting really sick of stories about them mistreating animals in their care, putting pets down within hours of them being collected and shite like this new story. Properly grings my gears. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.