R10? huntsman?

[robwelsh 354]

I just said that the r10 as it comes..With a silencer was to long for shooting out both windows, they don't come 36" , we're talking about standard rifles..or arnet we?

how many of you would consider a huntsman an upgrade from an R10?

 

Thought you were talking about guns, can'y see owt about Standard

how many tuned r10s are out there to tuned huntsmans ..have you had experience with both ,before and after a gun has been to jb ..I'm just saying it how it is, they are good guns..unless both were tuned or standard its hardly a fair comparison ..and jb can do so many things one r10 could be diffrent to the next

[silentshot1 206]

My figuring is that in this country we have a non FAC limit of 12 ftlbs, so neither can 'out power' the other.

 

Nearly all reasonable airguns can out shoot the shooter for accuracy these days, especially in the '£600 + new' price range

 

Both the Huntsman and R-10 (Mk1 or MkII) are quality guns if you get a good one and an arse if you get a pig.

 

It all comes down to which you prefer and feels better, neither will make you a better shot by ownership alone.

 

I've held a Huntsman and thought it was nice. I held an R-10 and thought it was awesome, even though the stock is right handed and I'm a lefty. It just fits and balances right.

 

It's all personal and I made my choice, I'm very happy now and will be delighted, I'm sure, when it comes bck from XTX tomorrow.

 

Hence, R-10 for me!