Dunkanon 380 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 This proposal despite numerous opposition has been pushed forward in December 2011 by them that call themselves the coalition. Cancer patients recieving chemotherapy will have to undergo stringent tests to prove that they are too ill to work and are entitled to sick benefits. This is wrong on every level, whilst this government wastes millions upon millions bailing out other EU countries,feeding,housing and paying benefits to the endless stream of immigrants and homegrown spongers and scroungers those seriously ill will have to suffer even more at the hands of this corrupt government whilst they try to save pennies in all the wrong quarters. If like myself you agree that this proposal should be kicked into touch then please copy and paste the link below, read the article and sign the Macmillan cancer Support petion opposed to this disgusting proposal. Thanks for reading, lets show our support. http://wp.me/p1U04a-zj 13 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
long dogs 580 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 makes you sick,if its not hard on them as it is 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
flinn 47 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 How about the Government f**k out every single immigrant that ever graced these shores, milking the benefit system to its limits and never worked a day in there lives, here lies the problem. Instead there so called cuts are aimed at the Disabled and people with Cancer, You could'nt make this shit up. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wxm 1,638 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 what a fcuking joke, i've posted it on facebook and will try and get the word out :thumbs: spineless fcukers picking on the ill i despise this goverment :censored: :censored: 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Fekin disgracefull and yet were spending fekin millons on treating aids sufferers who have come to this country from 3rd world shit holes its starting to get fekin sillyier now. 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dougall 98 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 F--KEN TORRIES SHOULD BE LINED UP AND SHOT EVEN THE ARSEHOLES WHO VOTED FOR THEM AND I BET THERES A FEW ON HERE F--KEN ARESHOLES Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kay 3,709 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 the b*****ds who voted this in should hang there heads in shame , there not fit to breath the same air as everyone else :censored: 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Buch 145 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I dont understand the problem ... surely your not saying that just because you have "x" disease, whether you can work or not, you shouldn't have to work... Before any one starts a mate of mine has just been diagnosed with testicular cancer and a couple of people in my family have suffered/died with it. If you cant work then you wont have to ... i know chemo is horrible and if your on it youl never have to work in a million years. The amendment that was proposed was that any one with cancer would automatically be able to claim benefits. Im sure youl agree that there are varying levels of severity regarding cancer, you could be on deaths door or you could have a dodgy spot on your back. Why should some one with relatively mild form of cancer be exempt but some one with a serious heart problem not exempt. If you think your due benefits you should get tested to see if your entitled regardless of disease, regardless of anything. Its the only way to stop scroungers thieving of everyday working people. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ideation 8,216 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 How about the Government f**k out every single immigrant that ever graced these shores, milking the benefit system to its limits and never worked a day in there lives, here lies the problem. Instead there so called cuts are aimed at the Disabled and people with Cancer, You could'nt make this shit up. A good chunk of the immigrants that grace these shores, will be treating the above mentioned cancer patients, and will be very well thought of by them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Its those receiving chemo then having to have a medical asesment then to see if their eligable for sick benefit that seems totally unjust to me. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
flinn 47 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 How about the Government f**k out every single immigrant that ever graced these shores, milking the benefit system to its limits and never worked a day in there lives, here lies the problem. Instead there so called cuts are aimed at the Disabled and people with Cancer, You could'nt make this shit up. A good chunk of the immigrants that grace these shores, will be treating the above mentioned cancer patients, and will be very well thought of by them. Yeah, but what about the hundreds of thousands of non qualified immigrants coming here for the free ride every single year?. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dunkanon 380 Posted March 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 How about the Government f**k out every single immigrant that ever graced these shores, milking the benefit system to its limits and never worked a day in there lives, here lies the problem. Instead there so called cuts are aimed at the Disabled and people with Cancer, You could'nt make this shit up. A good chunk of the immigrants that grace these shores, will be treating the above mentioned cancer patients, and will be very well thought of by them. Your well wide of the mark with that statement, a minority of the immigrants entering this country will be qualified profesionals working in the medical profession and of course people like that who enter the country with something to offer and contribute should be and are made welcome. I mentioned in my opening statement the millions wasted on immigrants and homegrown spongers and scroungers, basically I am refering to people who have no intention of contributing to our society and are here for themselves at the benefit of the taxpayer, and therfore placing an even futher burden on a welfare system that is already stretched beyond capacity. Leading to cutbacks wich effect people who really need the benefits of such a system i.e cancer patients amongst many others. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dunkanon 380 Posted March 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I dont understand the problem ... surely your not saying that just because you have "x" disease, whether you can work or not, you shouldn't have to work... Before any one starts a mate of mine has just been diagnosed with testicular cancer and a couple of people in my family have suffered/died with it. If you cant work then you wont have to ... i know chemo is horrible and if your on it youl never have to work in a million years. The amendment that was proposed was that any one with cancer would automatically be able to claim benefits. Im sure youl agree that there are varying levels of severity regarding cancer, you could be on deaths door or you could have a dodgy spot on your back. Why should some one with relatively mild form of cancer be exempt but some one with a serious heart problem not exempt. If you think your due benefits you should get tested to see if your entitled regardless of disease, regardless of anything. Its the only way to stop scroungers thieving of everyday working people. No i am surely not saying that anyone with "X" disease should be exempt from working wether they are fit to work or not, I am saying that someone who is diagnosed with cancer and in chemo therapy shouldnt have to go along to one of the governments little doctors whos brief it is sign people fit for work wherever possible and therfore reduce payouts. These sick people have to prove the fact that they are not well enough to work, Is it not enough that there will be medical reports from there own specialists and GPs etc that they have to prove it further. Surely anyone recieving chemo therapy is not well enough to work, hence the macmillan cancer trusts stance on the proposal. I am also saying that there is far more scroungers out there immigrant and homegrown who could do without the benefit system which they are bleeding dry...but instead as is typical with a Tory government the people who suffer are the sick,elderly and infirm. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Buch 145 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I dont understand the problem ... surely your not saying that just because you have "x" disease, whether you can work or not, you shouldn't have to work... Before any one starts a mate of mine has just been diagnosed with testicular cancer and a couple of people in my family have suffered/died with it. If you cant work then you wont have to ... i know chemo is horrible and if your on it youl never have to work in a million years. The amendment that was proposed was that any one with cancer would automatically be able to claim benefits. Im sure youl agree that there are varying levels of severity regarding cancer, you could be on deaths door or you could have a dodgy spot on your back. Why should some one with relatively mild form of cancer be exempt but some one with a serious heart problem not exempt. If you think your due benefits you should get tested to see if your entitled regardless of disease, regardless of anything. Its the only way to stop scroungers thieving of everyday working people. No i am surely not saying that anyone with "X" disease should be exempt from working wether they are fit to work or not, I am saying that someone who is diagnosed with cancer and in chemo therapy shouldnt have to go along to one of the governments little doctors whos brief it is sign people fit for work wherever possible and therfore reduce payouts. These sick people have to prove the fact that they are not well enough to work, Is it not enough that there will be medical reports from there own specialists and GPs etc that they have to prove it further. Surely anyone recieving chemo therapy is not well enough to work, hence the macmillan cancer trusts stance on the proposal. I am also saying that there is far more scroungers out there immigrant and homegrown who could do without the benefit system which they are bleeding dry...but instead as is typical with a Tory government the people who suffer are the sick,elderly and infirm. Yes i understand that. The amendment had nothing to do with chemo though. It was a blanket statement to do with "cancer". If your not robust with screening people then how do you stop the "scroungers" which we both agree need to be stopped. The last thing either of us want is people who really need help to be made to go out there and work. I dont believe for a second any one who needs it will be made to go out and work for one reason alone ... the sheer PR disaster it would be if you made a chemo patient go to work. The more complicated you make something the more loop holes you create, like if you have cancer you dont have to work which was what the amendment was basically asking for if you read it. Also i think its doing the people who decide who work or not a huge wrong turn if you think that they will just turn people out onto the street in wheel chairs and hospital beds. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
the big chief 3,099 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 this f*****g guvenmant is sick for doing things like that its descusting what this little island is cuming too they ort to be a shamed who ever brought that one up :no: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.