Jump to content

Legal to own cpc that has potential over 12psi?


Recommended Posts

Agreed events co-ordinator, the police aren't experts on the law, and regularly get it wrong. Now if they get it wrong and that puts you on the wrong side of the law, do you think they'll put their hands up and say "oops, sorry, my bad, I told him it was ok when it's not"? I'd suggest not counting on it.

 

Now, as to the legality. If they stop you and confiscate the rifle for testing, they will fire it with a range of pellets over a chronograph. They have to do that AS THE RIFLE IS RECEIVED, anything else would be called tampering with evidence. Now if you are careful and keep your rifle at below the 12 ft.lb with the heaviest pellets you can find, then you should be perfectly ok. It is not an offence to possess a rifle that is capable of being altered to fire a projectile at above the legal energy. The offence is possessing a rifle that is capable of firing a projectile at above 12 ft.lb. Any PCP can be altered given a bit of time and knowledge to run above the limit, as can most springers. It is the condition of the rifle as it is siezed that matters.

 

Remember though that it is NO defence to say that you have just received the weapon and aren't aware of the muzzle energy. I know at least one person on here who has a criminal record now because he bought, in good faith, a rifle that turned out to be over the limit.

 

It's a good idea to set it to about 11 ft.lb to give yourself a margin of error. Of course that means you need a chrono. An accurate chrono can be had for around the £100 mark.

  • Like 1
Link to post

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Illiteracy!

As long as you are aware, that using a section 1 airgun without an FAC is worth 5 years.

the rapid was made in fac aswell as 12ft lbs, ive got one on fac, the cut out in the stock at the rear of the bolt was done at the manufacturing stage, most pcp`s can be tampered with. but as long as

Agreed events co-ordinator, the police aren't experts on the law, and regularly get it wrong. Now if they get it wrong and that puts you on the wrong side of the law, do you think they'll put their hands up and say "oops, sorry, my bad, I told him it was ok when it's not"? I'd suggest not counting on it.

 

Now, as to the legality. If they stop you and confiscate the rifle for testing, they will fire it with a range of pellets over a chronograph. They have to do that AS THE RIFLE IS RECEIVED, anything else would be called tampering with evidence. Now if you are careful and keep your rifle at below the 12 ft.lb with the heaviest pellets you can find, then you should be perfectly ok. It is not an offence to possess a rifle that is capable of being altered to fire a projectile at above the legal energy. The offence is possessing a rifle that is capable of firing a projectile at above 12 ft.lb. Any PCP can be altered given a bit of time and knowledge to run above the limit, as can most springers. It is the condition of the rifle as it is siezed that matters.

 

Remember though that it is NO defence to say that you have just received the weapon and aren't aware of the muzzle energy. I know at least one person on here who has a criminal record now because he bought, in good faith, a rifle that turned out to be over the limit.

 

It's a good idea to set it to about 11 ft.lb to give yourself a margin of error. Of course that means you need a chrono. An accurate chrono can be had for around the £100 mark.

good advice that :thumbs:
Link to post

Agreed events co-ordinator, the police aren't experts on the law, and regularly get it wrong. Now if they get it wrong and that puts you on the wrong side of the law, do you think they'll put their hands up and say "oops, sorry, my bad, I told him it was ok when it's not"? I'd suggest not counting on it.

 

Now, as to the legality. If they stop you and confiscate the rifle for testing, they will fire it with a range of pellets over a chronograph. They have to do that AS THE RIFLE IS RECEIVED, anything else would be called tampering with evidence. Now if you are careful and keep your rifle at below the 12 ft.lb with the heaviest pellets you can find, then you should be perfectly ok. It is not an offence to possess a rifle that is capable of being altered to fire a projectile at above the legal energy. The offence is possessing a rifle that is capable of firing a projectile at above 12 ft.lb. Any PCP can be altered given a bit of time and knowledge to run above the limit, as can most springers. It is the condition of the rifle as it is siezed that matters.

 

Remember though that it is NO defence to say that you have just received the weapon and aren't aware of the muzzle energy. I know at least one person on here who has a criminal record now because he bought, in good faith, a rifle that turned out to be over the limit.

 

It's a good idea to set it to about 11 ft.lb to give yourself a margin of error. Of course that means you need a chrono. An accurate chrono can be had for around the £100 mark.

Best advice yet , thanks. Could even borrow a chrono and make sure it is under 12ftlbs and fit a blank plate so the allan key adjuster is not easily accesable.
Link to post

Agreed events co-ordinator, the police aren't experts on the law, and regularly get it wrong. Now if they get it wrong and that puts you on the wrong side of the law, do you think they'll put their hands up and say "oops, sorry, my bad, I told him it was ok when it's not"? I'd suggest not counting on it.

 

Now, as to the legality. If they stop you and confiscate the rifle for testing, they will fire it with a range of pellets over a chronograph. They have to do that AS THE RIFLE IS RECEIVED, anything else would be called tampering with evidence. Now if you are careful and keep your rifle at below the 12 ft.lb with the heaviest pellets you can find, then you should be perfectly ok. It is not an offence to possess a rifle that is capable of being altered to fire a projectile at above the legal energy. The offence is possessing a rifle that is capable of firing a projectile at above 12 ft.lb. Any PCP can be altered given a bit of time and knowledge to run above the limit, as can most springers. It is the condition of the rifle as it is siezed that matters.

 

Remember though that it is NO defence to say that you have just received the weapon and aren't aware of the muzzle energy. I know at least one person on here who has a criminal record now because he bought, in good faith, a rifle that turned out to be over the limit.

 

It's a good idea to set it to about 11 ft.lb to give yourself a margin of error. Of course that means you need a chrono. An accurate chrono can be had for around the £100 mark.

 

An accurate chrono can be had for under £41, my Combro 625 is within 5 foot per second of an RFDs calibrated Chrony (it reads slightly faster, probably due to location of the Combro, ie right at the muzzle end), so pays your money, takes your choice!

Edited by secretagentmole
Link to post

Most air rifles these days have the potential to shoot over 12 foot lbs, it is only a few adjustments that stop them from doing so, which is where a few shooters are allegedly coming unstuck with the authorities and their testing laboratories, they make the adjustments and lo a 11.5 ft lb rifle is clocked at 18, well it had the potential to do that you see!

Link to post

If you can adjust it over 12 ftlbs it would need to be on a fac and remember if you take it into an rfd and it chronos over 12 he cannot legally return the gun to you Do NOT ask your police firearms dept. Ask your shooting association SACS/BASC etc they will tell you what the law is not what they want it to be as the police often do.

the police are bound by law making sure they have disclosed accurate information .... Just finishing a BSc degree in Policing.

:D

Link to post

It is not the police responsible for testing though, it is the laboratory they use, not always run by the Home Office you know. Furthermore once they have demonstrated that it has the potential to exceed 12 foot pounds energy, you are screwed. It does not state that the gun has to be tested in the condition they obtained it, there have been alleged cases of the testing laboratory tampering with the rifle to prove it can exceed 12 foot pounds and then hey presto, a gun crime solved!

 

Check the legislation, it is so loose you could use it to sieve elephants!

Edited by secretagentmole
Link to post

the problem is uk gun laws, most air rifles are made outside uk where power levels are not an issue, so any deemed for the uk market are governed as cheaply as possible plastic plug in a grub screw etc...... and called anti tamper :laugh: :laugh: so most if not all can be made to go beyond 12ft lbs with very little effort. the key is, to ensure if its not on fac its below 12 ft lbs, most good gunshops with test and issue a certificate for about a £5 money well spent every 6 months or so if you ask me. at least its a documented independent check :thumbs:

Link to post

If you can adjust it over 12 ftlbs it would need to be on a fac and remember if you take it into an rfd and it chronos over 12 he cannot legally return the gun to you Do NOT ask your police firearms dept. Ask your shooting association SACS/BASC etc they will tell you what the law is not what they want it to be as the police often do.

the police are bound by law making sure they have disclosed accurate information .... Just finishing a BSc degree in Policing.

:D

Just think i have the answer then a counter argument comes along and i am not so sure. Anybody know What is the actual ledgislation for air wepons and more importantly how it is enforced?

 

As long as you are shooting on your own land and not at the neighbours cat, windows etc what is the liklehood of the law coming along and taking your air rifle away for testing?

 

Anyone here ever had their rifle conficated, tested and returned by the police?

 

Years agoe the a pair of bobbies came to the house and asked my father to see our air rifle as a nearby caravan had aquired a neat .22 size hole in it. They took one look at the old HW35 and handed it back. Turns out it was a rimfire that made the hole, by some guy who had been passing by shooting rabbits without permission to do so.

Link to post

It is not the police responsible for testing though, it is the laboratory they use, not always run by the Home Office you know. Furthermore once they have demonstrated that it has the potential to exceed 12 foot pounds energy, you are screwed. It does not state that the gun has to be tested in the condition they obtained it, there have been alleged cases of the testing laboratory tampering with the rifle to prove it can exceed 12 foot pounds and then hey presto, a gun crime solved!

 

Check the legislation, it is so loose you could use it to sieve elephants!

 

 

 

If that is the case, does that mean I am screwed by owning my HW100?

Because I know for a fact, it CAN be made to shoot over 12ftlb, even though at the moment it is putting out 11.4 ftlb.

Link to post

Regardless of what power a rifle can put out the issue is simple. If the anti Tamper pins are intact then the rifle is sub 12ftlbs you have no problems. However if the anti tamper pins have been removed or indeed tampered with other than the condition they were in when they left the factory then you are in possession of a Section 1 firearm, even if the power is sub 12ftlbs when taken for testing. The anti tamper pins/screws need to be intact for the gun to remain legal!

Edited by Simonrees
  • Like 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...