still cant decide!

[chartpolski 23,376]

The right one looks from the picture to have very little shoudler movment to terrier looking lack of abilty to turn at speed.

Also front shoulders looked dropped with shorter front legs than the rear out of balance looking dog.

 

The rough coated one looks a better all round dog with good bone shape.

 

So rough coated fo me.

 

ATB Cookie

 

You can tell all that from one, not very flattering, photo ? WOW !!

 

Cheers.

 

Thought you was never replying to one of my posts ever again as always a another THL member bollocks.

if you run your hands over enough dogs you dont need to be a rocket sciences to see that dogs faults as a pure running dog compared to the other pup.

 

ATB Cookie

 

I know enough about dogs to know you cant judge ANY dog, let alone a pup, from one picture where you cant even see the whole dog !

 

Cheers.

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

does she look a better shape in this picture?

third hair to the right of its ear is shorter that the one next to it :laugh:

 

Not that sort dogs ive heard you prefer rough dogs not rough coated ones Paulus

ATB Cookie

[reddawn 2,173]

if it was between the 2 an no others, id run em both on ateast for a bit an see what happens

[paulus 26]

all i will say both have a fair whack of growing to do by the size of them hocks

[northern lad 2,292]

both nice pal,rough coated one for me atb dave

[paulus 26]

does she look a better shape in this picture?

third hair to the right of its ear is shorter that the one next to it :laugh:

 

Not that sort dogs ive heard you prefer rough dogs not rough coated ones Paulus

ATB Cookie

true colours already poor show

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

The right one looks from the picture to have very little shoudler movment to terrier looking lack of abilty to turn at speed.

Also front shoulders looked dropped with shorter front legs than the rear out of balance looking dog.

 

The rough coated one looks a better all round dog with good bone shape.

 

So rough coated fo me.

 

ATB Cookie

 

You can tell all that from one, not very flattering, photo ? WOW !!

 

Cheers.

 

Thought you was never replying to one of my posts ever again as always a another THL member bollocks.

if you run your hands over enough dogs you dont need to be a rocket sciences to see that dogs faults as a pure running dog compared to the other pup.

 

ATB Cookie

 

I know enough about dogs to know you cant judge ANY dog, let alone a pup, from one picture where you cant even see the whole dog !

 

Cheers.

 

So based on that reply all our comments should be based on the looks of the dogs rather than construstive talk of the dogs shape etc .

 

I like rough coated lurchers but would I choose a pup because of the looks rather than shape and form etc Iover a smooth coated pup that is better shaped than a rough in a litter I think not.

 

ATB Cookie

[shushycatcher 219]

the brindle is broken coated,and they are only 11 weeks old!

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

does she look a better shape in this picture?

third hair to the right of its ear is shorter that the one next to it :laugh:

 

Not that sort dogs ive heard you prefer rough dogs not rough coated ones Paulus

ATB Cookie

true colours already poor show

 

Called leg pulling Paulus you made a piss taking comment on my abilty to judge a dog from a picture you dont see me getting my knickers in a twist with porr show old by comments

[Tiny 7 1,694]

Ill be sending you a few pics in the next few weeks/months on the two iv kept back fellah

[chartpolski 23,376]

The right one looks from the picture to have very little shoudler movment to terrier looking lack of abilty to turn at speed.

Also front shoulders looked dropped with shorter front legs than the rear out of balance looking dog.

 

The rough coated one looks a better all round dog with good bone shape.

 

So rough coated fo me.

 

ATB Cookie

 

You can tell all that from one, not very flattering, photo ? WOW !!

 

Cheers.

 

Thought you was never replying to one of my posts ever again as always a another THL member bollocks.

if you run your hands over enough dogs you dont need to be a rocket sciences to see that dogs faults as a pure running dog compared to the other pup.

 

ATB Cookie

 

I know enough about dogs to know you cant judge ANY dog, let alone a pup, from one picture where you cant even see the whole dog !

 

Cheers.

 

So based on that reply all our comments should be based on the looks of the dogs rather than construstive talk of the dogs shape etc .

 

I like rough coated lurchers but would I choose a pup because of the looks rather than shape and form etc Iover a smooth coated pup that is better shaped than a rough in a litter I think not.

 

ATB Cookie

 

 

What are you on about ? I stand by what I've said ; You can't tell much atall about a pup from one picture, that doesn't even show the complete dog... If you think you can, fair enough.

 

Cheers.

[paulus 26]

does she look a better shape in this picture?

third hair to the right of its ear is shorter that the one next to it :laugh:

 

Not that sort dogs ive heard you prefer rough dogs not rough coated ones Paulus

ATB Cookie

true colours already poor show

 

Called leg pulling Paulus you made a piss taking comment on my abilty to judge a dog from a picture you dont see me getting my knickers in a twist with porr show old by comments

no knickers twisted here just pointing out rash comments are easy to make but harder to admit,

[cocker 2,654]

just going by the pictures, without seeing them for real, i would chose the brindle one, definatley.

[Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin]

The right one looks from the picture to have very little shoudler movment to terrier looking lack of abilty to turn at speed.

Also front shoulders looked dropped with shorter front legs than the rear out of balance looking dog.

 

The rough coated one looks a better all round dog with good bone shape.

 

So rough coated fo me.

 

ATB Cookie

 

You can tell all that from one, not very flattering, photo ? WOW !!

 

Cheers.

 

Thought you was never replying to one of my posts ever again as always a another THL member bollocks.

if you run your hands over enough dogs you dont need to be a rocket sciences to see that dogs faults as a pure running dog compared to the other pup.

 

ATB Cookie

 

I know enough about dogs to know you cant judge ANY dog, let alone a pup, from one picture where you cant even see the whole dog !

 

Cheers.

 

So based on that reply all our comments should be based on the looks of the dogs rather than construstive talk of the dogs shape etc .

 

I like rough coated lurchers but would I choose a pup because of the looks rather than shape and form etc Iover a smooth coated pup that is better shaped than a rough in a litter I think not.

 

ATB Cookie

 

 

What are you on about ? I stand by what I've said ; You can't tell much atall about a pup from one picture, that doesn't even show the complete dog... If you think you can, fair enough.

 

Cheers.

 

So the OP said he cant decide between the two them.

 

So options are for us based on the pictures provided is to say.

 

A based on colour I prefer left or right

 

B based on coat I prefer left or right

 

C without seeing the pups in the flesh i cant decide for you mate as none of us have clue as we have never breed or owned lurcher in our lives so we could not give a option on your choice .

 

D keep them both

 

So bascally its a pointless thread as each member has diffrent opinions on the coice so should be poll thread

 

I am trying to offer a opinion based on the picture provided which for me shows some clear indcations of the type of lurcher it will become not which collor shape coat of dog I prefer.

 

ATB Cookie

[graham4877 1,181]

Pups..... looks and shape change so much each week month just like the like the wind! so keep both!