PlasticJock 539 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 freeman of the land youd be suprised what you could learn I knew there'd be at least one on this site!!! Good stuff mate, as the LAW maxim says, ''Ignorance of the law is no excuse.'' So when a copper tries pulling section 44 of the Terrorism Act from his hoop, he obviously isn't aware that it was ruled to be unlawful by the European court of human rights. But still insists on using it, unlawfully. But most people are blindly obedient so do as they're told like good little sheep... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 freeman of the land youd be suprised what you could learn I knew there'd be at least one on this site!!! Good stuff mate, as the LAW maxim says, ''Ignorance of the law is no excuse.'' So when a copper tries pulling section 44 of the Terrorism Act from his hoop, he obviously isn't aware that it was ruled to be unlawful by the European court of human rights. But still insists on using it, unlawfully. But most people are blindly obedient so do as they're told like good little sheep... or some people would rather avoid uneccasery attention from the cops,for a load of shit like jumping a red light. accept the fact he was unlucky,and got caught. like hundreds of motoricists a day. unlike this annoyingúcunt most take thier medicine and go on thier way. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
just jack 998 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 Look at this one that came up on the related videos ......... http://www.youtube.c...feature=related for a second i thought it was MOO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlasticJock 539 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 freeman of the land youd be suprised what you could learn I knew there'd be at least one on this site!!! Good stuff mate, as the LAW maxim says, ''Ignorance of the law is no excuse.'' So when a copper tries pulling section 44 of the Terrorism Act from his hoop, he obviously isn't aware that it was ruled to be unlawful by the European court of human rights. But still insists on using it, unlawfully. But most people are blindly obedient so do as they're told like good little sheep... or some people would rather avoid uneccasery attention from the cops,for a load of shit like jumping a red light. accept the fact he was unlucky,and got caught. like hundreds of motoricists a day. unlike this annoyingúcunt most take thier medicine and go on thier way. He is a smartarse, and the sort of person that I'd usually want to kick in the face several times... The point is that once you understand what money actually is, what law is, you start to see that the mick is being taken out of you by 'The State'. It's a lot to get your head around but it's common sense, but if you'd rather pay £60 to avoid an arguement then that's your choice! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 Seen this before the guy is a smart arse prick, "I've been advised by my lawyer not to say anything" so if I'd gne through a red light and knocked this tw@t off his push bike Would be be so indignant. "I'm a student of the law" no mate your a tosser. Always the same this type of person, these are the types that scream its against health and safety at every opportunity and spend thier weekends filming hunts, w@nk3rs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,494 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 The point is that once you understand what money actually is, what law is, you start to see that the mick is being taken out of you by 'The State'. It's a lot to get your head around but it's common sense, but if you'd rather pay £60 to avoid an arguement then that's your choice! Think id rather pay the 60 quid than make a c**t of myself like that ! Im no fan of ol bill but i feel for them having to deal with prats like that without getting physical. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlasticJock 539 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 The point is that once you understand what money actually is, what law is, you start to see that the mick is being taken out of you by 'The State'. It's a lot to get your head around but it's common sense, but if you'd rather pay £60 to avoid an arguement then that's your choice! Think id rather pay the 60 quid than make a c**t of myself like that ! Im no fan of ol bill but i feel for them having to deal with prats like that without getting physical. That's your choice mate Not saying I wouldn't pay it mind, but these a***holes are just revenue collectors, a fine for this and a fine for that.... People are slowly getting pissed off at the ridiculous amount of legislation put in place by a government who weren't elected by the majority, who are inept and regularly abuse their positions (and get away with it), and if you have a quick look on YouTube these 'idiots' show coppers up everyday of the week. Look at the firearms legislation - most of it based on kneejerk reactions to tragic events, and influenced by the media to the extent that nobody bothers to find out the facts for fear of losing public support. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 (edited) 'I've been advised by my lawyer to remain silent' then goes on to have a 5 minute conversation with him. Edited January 9, 2012 by blan89 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 correct me if im wrong ,but crashing a red light ha s always been a crime. yes there are daft laws,but as i said there is a time you should stand up for your rights.however this wasnt it. ffs the cop asked him his name and if he had id on him,for breaking a road law.he also asked in a civil way.all he got for his trouble was a arrogant prick quoting laws at him. rather pay the fixed penalty than be draggged off to a manky cell for hours spoiling my day and have the cops taking an interest in me. but like you said its our choice how we react. i like the quiet life personally.keep myself under thier radar at all costs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
foxfan 479 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 Whilst i agree that there is no need to antagonise the police needlessly, some people dont like the idea that its ok for us to be under heavy survielance with cctv, numberplate recognition etc, Britain is the most heavily watched nation in the world, you have to realise the potential for misuse of all that info by the powers that be. And before you come out with 'if your doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about' our society is based on habeus corpus (soon to change under EU rules) You might not want to accept it but its police state creeping in, has been for a long time. ; 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 'I've been advised by my lawyer to remain silent' then goes on to have a 5 minute conversation with him. yea so he can film it and stick it online for all the other cyclists to think oh look how clever he is. total wank stain is what he is. he does this regulary.survelliance is a two way street.yes it can be abused but also beneficial for more serious crimes. ie child abduction,murder and the biggest threat terrorisim. i have no prob with it at all tbh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 correct me if im wrong ,but crashing a red light ha s always been a crime. yes there are daft laws,but as i said there is a time you should stand up for your rights.however this wasnt it. ffs the cop asked him his name and if he had id on him,for breaking a road law.he also asked in a civil way.all he got for his trouble was a arrogant prick quoting laws at him. rather pay the fixed penalty than be draggged off to a manky cell for hours spoiling my day and have the cops taking an interest in me. but like you said its our choice how we react. i like the quiet life personally.keep myself under thier radar at all costs. i understand wanting to stay under the radar,just give it the 'yes,sir.no,sir.sorry sir' then be left alone. but that's not going to work for long imo,like has been said we're very heavily observed,it's going to get worse and with the way things are going with the E.U,things will get very bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlasticJock 539 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 correct me if im wrong ,but crashing a red light ha s always been a crime. yes there are daft laws,but as i said there is a time you should stand up for your rights.however this wasnt it. ffs the cop asked him his name and if he had id on him,for breaking a road law.he also asked in a civil way.all he got for his trouble was a arrogant prick quoting laws at him. rather pay the fixed penalty than be draggged off to a manky cell for hours spoiling my day and have the cops taking an interest in me. but like you said its our choice how we react. i like the quiet life personally.keep myself under thier radar at all costs. Same here mate don't get me wrong, I don't look for trouble and I know for a fact that a few of these guys are currently in nick for various things. I also know that most of them aren't 'freemen' but freeloaders who use every trick in the book to get out of paying debts, tickets etc... Which f**ks up their case somewhat. Also, they make the arguement that this was an offence under statute law and as they haven't given their consent to be governed by it, it doesn't apply to them. Well I'm sorry but I guarantee he'd be the first one to claim against the driver who went into him, not to mention the trauma he could cause others if he caused an accident, so I agree he should have been nicked for being a knob either way. Not looking for an arguement in anyway, I was just pointing out that while they are the arrogant student types, some of them make very valid points... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 no argument from me either mate,just my opinion bud. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 correct me if im wrong ,but crashing a red light ha s always been a crime. yes there are daft laws,but as i said there is a time you should stand up for your rights.however this wasnt it. ffs the cop asked him his name and if he had id on him,for breaking a road law.he also asked in a civil way.all he got for his trouble was a arrogant prick quoting laws at him. rather pay the fixed penalty than be draggged off to a manky cell for hours spoiling my day and have the cops taking an interest in me. but like you said its our choice how we react. i like the quiet life personally.keep myself under thier radar at all costs. i understand wanting to stay under the radar,just give it the 'yes,sir.no,sir.sorry sir' then be left alone. but that's not going to work for long imo,like has been said we're very heavily observed,it's going to get worse and with the way things are going with the E.U,things will get very bad. just out of curiosity and to let me try and work out your way of thinking. what exactly do you think is gonna happen. there are just as many daft laws protecting our rights are there are abusing them. prob more than the latter actually. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.