mackem 26,264 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 how many folk would have agreed she was right if either there was no kids present/or she used decent language an viewed her opinions in a better way 99%,the 1% who wouldnt have voted for her was the nigerian sitting quietly over there in the corner feeling woefully outnumbered like custer at the battle of the little bighorn 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,062 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 were bitsas gnash like it or not You speak for yourself son......purebred dogs are defined as being bred true to type of a modern breed with written documentation showing the individuals descent from its foundation stock. As far as i know i dont look like a viking and theres no written documentation saying my gr gr gr gr gr grandad was a viking either......thats good enough for me Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Catcher 1 639 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 the poor fuckers been named and shamed on the news and shes getting done all for calling someone a paki on the train. f*****g joke as soon as a white person says something :censored: :censored: :censored: Good hope she gets a few months jail. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Keswick 119 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Whatever people think on here or elswhere, i think she is right to voice her opinion if she feels that way about it. Too many people are too scared to say what they actually think about this subject, for fear of being labeled a racist or some other politicaly correct, made up bullshit term. As for the arguments about being british if your born here, well that is just folk trying to justify overpopulating an already overpopulated country. Simple fact is, if your brown and you havent been on holiday recently, the chances are you aint british... If you can pronounce your "v's" the chances are you aint british etc etc. Yes, the gal was probably pissed up or otherwise intoxicated and shouldnt have used bad language like she did, however, if she is prosecuted for that, then it proves that true british people are treated as second class citizens in thier own country. If the boot was on the other foot (as has happened way to often recently), the authorities would be too scared to prosecute for fear of being racist. The whole situation in this country is FUBAR! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
greg64 2,818 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 were bitsas gnash like it or not You speak for yourself son......purebred dogs are defined as being bred true to type of a modern breed with written documentation showing the individuals descent from its foundation stock. As far as i know i dont look like a viking and theres no written documentation saying my gr gr gr gr gr grandad was a viking either......thats good enough for me if you did a dna test you might think differently, Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simoman 110 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 there is only 4 votes out of 56 swaying this towards the she was wrong verdict how many folk would have agreed she was right if either there was no kids present/or she used decent language an viewed her opinions in a better way I think for many the main problem is her language and the fact she sees no problem using that language in public in front of children, including her ownn and she also appears moronic, especially the Niggeragua comment, to me she seems ignorant and im all for a well thought out debate, but anybody can swear and shout abuse with no real substance or facts to back up a discussion. Surely it takes intellect to carry a reasoned disscussion and ignorance to just swear and abuse? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
reddawn 2,173 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 there is only 4 votes out of 56 swaying this towards the she was wrong verdict how many folk would have agreed she was right if either there was no kids present/or she used decent language an viewed her opinions in a better way I think for many the main problem is her language and the fact she sees no problem using that language in public in front of children, including her ownn and she also appears moronic, especially the Niggeragua comment, to me she seems ignorant and im all for a well thought out debate, but anybody can swear and shout abuse with no real substance or facts to back up a discussion. Surely it takes intellect to carry a reasoned disscussion and ignorance to just swear and abuse? i agree mate, but i think its amazing that even with her foul mouthed language an obvious ignorance for others around her(her own child atleast) that still only 3 more folk out 57 think she was wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simoman 110 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 there is only 4 votes out of 56 swaying this towards the she was wrong verdict how many folk would have agreed she was right if either there was no kids present/or she used decent language an viewed her opinions in a better way I think for many the main problem is her language and the fact she sees no problem using that language in public in front of children, including her ownn and she also appears moronic, especially the Niggeragua comment, to me she seems ignorant and im all for a well thought out debate, but anybody can swear and shout abuse with no real substance or facts to back up a discussion. Surely it takes intellect to carry a reasoned disscussion and ignorance to just swear and abuse? i agree mate, but i think its amazing that even with her foul mouthed language an obvious ignorance for others around her(her own child atleast) that still only 3 more folk out 57 think she was wrong Yep, and thats what i was talking about earlier, this government and its limp wristed ways are making folk racist, or at the very least angry at the way some are treated opposed to its own citizens........ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
.terrier man. 193 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 the poor fuckers been named and shamed on the news and shes getting done all for calling someone a paki on the train. f*****g joke as soon as a white person says something :censored: :censored: :censored: Good hope she gets a few months jail. for swearing, get a grip fella ffs 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 26,264 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Surely it takes intellect to carry a reasoned disscussion What use discussion?We can debate this for aeons,till the cows come home,till the world stops turning,but with no real result whatsoever,canute lied about the power to hold back the tide,we have a human tide thats swamping and flooding this tiny island,is it any real surprise that some whatever their eloquence or lack of snap,she just vocalised what a lot of people in this country without a public voice would like shouted from the rooftops. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,062 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 if you did a dna test you might think differently, Like i said....you just gotta keep things sensible.....if im not English....no one is ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Catcher 1 639 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 the poor fuckers been named and shamed on the news and shes getting done all for calling someone a paki on the train. f*****g joke as soon as a white person says something :censored: :censored: :censored: Good hope she gets a few months jail. for swearing, get a grip fella ffs For swearing ? Have a look at the video again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,062 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 I think for many the main problem is her language and the fact she sees no problem using that language in public in front of children, including her ownn and she also appears moronic, especially the Niggeragua comment, to me she seems ignorant and im all for a well thought out debate, but anybody can swear and shout abuse with no real substance or facts to back up a discussion. Surely it takes intellect to carry a reasoned disscussion and ignorance to just swear and abuse? I dont agree with that....im thick as arseholes but i can still have a decent debate......cut out all of her swear words quieten her down a bit and get rid of that daft London accent ....and she probably didnt say anything anyone else wouldnt have said debating the same subject. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
greg64 2,818 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 if you did a dna test you might think differently, Like i said....you just gotta keep things sensible.....if im not English....no one is ! like the guy in your avatars a cockney,the russian jew and he supports totenham lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simoman 110 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Surely it takes intellect to carry a reasoned disscussion What use discussion?We can debate this for aeons,till the cows come home,till the world stops turning,but with no real result whatsoever,canute lied about the power to hold back the tide,we have a human tide thats swamping and flooding this tiny island,is it any real surprise that some whatever their eloquence or lack of snap,she just vocalised what a lot of people in this country without a public voice would like shouted from the rooftops. Perhaps your right, what use is discussion, but look where being a foul mouthed numpty got her....... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.