Sako.243 1 Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 Animal rights activists are lobbying for an abandoned polar bear cub born at Berlin Zoo to be put down. The bundle of fur called Knut became something of a superstar at the zoo when he was ignored by his mother. He has been bottle fed and comforted by zoo staff ever since and has even been snapped by celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz for an environmental protection campaign. Now three-months-old, little Knut is at the centre of a row over whether he should be allowed to continue living or be put down. Animal rights activists say domesticating the bear is cruel, unnatural and will prevent him forming relationships with other bears in the future. Ruediger Schmeidel from the Foundation for Bears is adamant "they cannot domesticate a wild animal", as he continues to clash with the zoo over Knut's welfare. But Andre Schuele, chief vet at Berlin Zoo said: "Polar bears live alone in the wild. I see no logical reason why this bear should be killed." He added: "Polar bears are under threat of extinction, and if we feed the bear with a bottle it has a good chance of growing up and perhaps becoming attractive as a stud for other zoos." Any thoughts ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mole trapper 1,693 Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 Put the antis down, keep the bear, at least the bear has a use. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chay 0 Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 these antis are fckn dimwits with nout better to do .they know they are a minority group so if they shout they will be heard and once heard the tree hugging dope smoking anuses will say fckn anything to provoke an arguement.i think im correct in saying polar bears are on the endangered list or sumthing[i may be wrong] and they want to put one down!!!!!!!!!!!fuds long term the animal would at least have an area climatically controlled and as close to its habitat as possible , fed properly and possibly in the future saved from possible extinction. and who knows if needs must ,reintroduced to the wild[provided it would be beneficial for the animal] but back to the antis they will argue and object to any good anyone does no matter what damage they do in the process. the one that gets me is when the wanks kick horses and hounds and claim to be animal lovers the pricks would just have to do it once infront of me and even though id probly get my fat ass booted in id make sure the twats got a good kick in the nuts for the horse or hound they just touched. THEY ARE WANKHEADS we will never understand them cos they do not want to be understood they want to cause trouble end of story. i can see it now several years time when the countryside is all to fck and overrun with vermin they will lobby to start an animal lovers gamekeeper job were the nobheads take on the role of a gamekeeper, a once rspectable job these cutns wiped out. they will give it a different title, yet the roles will be the same and they will tell everyone how this is the way forward to bring harmony to the countryside once more!they will probly say we need to course the hares with lurchers to keep them strong. we should hunt the fox with dogs from horseback, trap crows and egg snatching birds in traps, use terriers to get rid of stubborn foxes and use ferrets to keep rabbits down............. the roles will be reversed they will be the keepers of the countryside we will be fckd to the side while these fckrs do what we do now.... sory about the rant but im sick to the back teeth of these wnkrs chay Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sako.243 1 Posted March 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 these antis are fckn dimwits with nout better to do .they know they are a minority groupso if they shout they will be heard and once heard the tree hugging dope smoking anuses will say fckn anything to provoke an arguement.i think im correct in saying polar bears are on the endangered list or sumthing[i may be wrong] and they want to put one down!!!!!!!!!!!fuds long term the animal would at least have an area climatically controlled and as close to its habitat as possible , fed properly and possibly in the future saved from possible extinction. and who knows if needs must ,reintroduced to the wild[provided it would be beneficial for the animal] but back to the antis they will argue and object to any good anyone does no matter what damage they do in the process. the one that gets me is when the wanks kick horses and hounds and claim to be animal lovers the pricks would just have to do it once infront of me and even though id probly get my fat ass booted in id make sure the twats got a good kick in the nuts for the horse or hound they just touched. THEY ARE WANKHEADS we will never understand them cos they do not want to be understood they want to cause trouble end of story. i can see it now several years time when the countryside is all to fck and overrun with vermin they will lobby to start an animal lovers gamekeeper job were the nobheads take on the role of a gamekeeper, a once rspectable job these cutns wiped out. they will give it a different title, yet the roles will be the same and they will tell everyone how this is the way forward to bring harmony to the countryside once more!they will probly say we need to course the hares with lurchers to keep them strong. we should hunt the fox with dogs from horseback, trap crows and egg snatching birds in traps, use terriers to get rid of stubborn foxes and use ferrets to keep rabbits down............. the roles will be reversed they will be the keepers of the countryside we will be fckd to the side while these fckrs do what we do now.... sory about the rant but im sick to the back teeth of these wnkrs chay Get In !!! Nice one mate, Everything you have just said is spot on i am also sick to the back f*****g teeth as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ossie 11 Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 sounds about right chay. christ, i'm pissed off. not just about the hunt ban, it seems the government & their subsiduaries (i.e. the local council) are intent on shitting on every aspect of my life at the mo', and i find i have to justify my actions to antis, then get stick off hunting people cos they think i look like one! i mean, christ, should i be walking around in twinset & pearls, a nice dress? i'll stick with the cut-off combats, para boots & old t-shirts!! the funniest comment i've ever had was from a young farmer i got chatting to in a pub one night. bit posh, very drunk... after a long discussion on hunting, meat production, and various other things i'm deeply passionate about, he turned round & said "i love you! you look like a hippy, but you're really not!" good job his girlfriend didn't hear that... f**k the antis! i wear my "Ban The Ban" wristband with pride, all day, every day, i refuse to take it off, no matter what i'm doing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chay 0 Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 anyone know were to get these ban the ban wristbands Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maty j 6 Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 anyone know were to get these ban the ban wristbands dont know if there still available but the countryside alliance used to sell them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
anton 0 Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 these antis are fckn dimwits with nout better to do .they know they are a minority groupso if they shout they will be heard and once heard the tree hugging dope smoking anuses will say fckn anything to provoke an arguement.i think im correct in saying polar bears are on the endangered list or sumthing[i may be wrong] and they want to put one down!!!!!!!!!!!fuds long term the animal would at least have an area climatically controlled and as close to its habitat as possible , fed properly and possibly in the future saved from possible extinction. and who knows if needs must ,reintroduced to the wild[provided it would be beneficial for the animal] but back to the antis they will argue and object to any good anyone does no matter what damage they do in the process. the one that gets me is when the wanks kick horses and hounds and claim to be animal lovers the pricks would just have to do it once infront of me and even though id probly get my fat ass booted in id make sure the twats got a good kick in the nuts for the horse or hound they just touched. THEY ARE WANKHEADS we will never understand them cos they do not want to be understood they want to cause trouble end of story. i can see it now several years time when the countryside is all to fck and overrun with vermin they will lobby to start an animal lovers gamekeeper job were the nobheads take on the role of a gamekeeper, a once rspectable job these cutns wiped out. they will give it a different title, yet the roles will be the same and they will tell everyone how this is the way forward to bring harmony to the countryside once more!they will probly say we need to course the hares with lurchers to keep them strong. we should hunt the fox with dogs from horseback, trap crows and egg snatching birds in traps, use terriers to get rid of stubborn foxes and use ferrets to keep rabbits down............. the roles will be reversed they will be the keepers of the countryside we will be fckd to the side while these fckrs do what we do now.... sory about the rant but im sick to the back teeth of these wnkrs chay b**ger i'll get that printed on a t-shirt Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest WILF Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 Shoot the fecking thing and make a rug......well done antis :thumbs-up: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.