blan89 159 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 either way if we went back to just fewer basic laws the police wouldn't need to get involved with drug dealers and the multitude of other 'criminals' who commit victimless crimes, how do drug dealers commit victimless crimes? Whilst i appreciate that someone selling a little cannabis they may have grown at home is not the worlds worst crimminal, your blanket statement legitimises heorin, crack cocaine and meth amp dealers....you cannot really be serious? The cause of many house breakins and shop lifting offences are drug addiction. the reason for armed gangs to be shooting at each other is for territorial control of supply of class a drugs. Class A drug dependancy can lead to prostitution as well. Added to these facts, the amount of heroin produced in places like afghanistan and sold into europe helps fund fighters who kill our troops and i think you need to seriously look at how you view what the police do?? In your ideal world what parts of your privatised police force would investigate rape or child molestation? There would be no profit in that, most of the victims would be too scared or too young to be able to pay for a prosecution. Lets say i steal your identity and run up debts on your paid up house can your private firm deal with that? lets say if i live in Romonia and am doing it remotely? How much does Interpol cost...?? As someone who has been so fortunate i think paying your taxes for the relative security of our country is a no brainer. And the police didnt ban hunting, the government did through a combination of media spin, public ignorance and class hatred... no-one is forced to take drugs,i dont know a single person who has been put off because they're illegal (to lots of people that attracts them imo) the war is unjustifiable,if another country invaded here and started pushing their foreign ideologies onto our people i think lots of us would be doing what the 'terrorists' are doing. heres a good man on the war as for the rest,why not let charity be charity? big corporations dont pay tax so the bill is all footed by the consumer,willing or not,we could keep a few police officers for the very poor etc but if a child was attacked or something similar would big businesses not fund a more efficient search for her killer knowing the good publicity it would bring? would the private citizens not also be willing to help? right now we've got a 'liberal' population,but its not liberal,its just lazy and docile and expects the inefficient and inherently corrupt government to sort out all our problems. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 as for the police,most of the laws they enforce are (must be even to their minds) unjust. what kind of coward would enforce unjust repressive laws that they themselves dont agree with? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 I wonder if theses will be charged with assault? yes i know he's black. if your a bigot,just try and imagine he's your color because they dont have 1 law for them and 1 for us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
boyo 1,398 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 its the goverment that make the laws not the police all they are doing is their job to the best of their abilaty i dont like some of the jobs ive done but he who pays the wages gets to say what gets done. and blan gotta agree with the posts on here you have posted some stupid shit on here . just hope you dont need the police to help you and or your family in the future . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 26,948 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 is that the best vid you could find blan????????? that was pathetic,, fook all happening there im shure there are better ones out there than that , you could yous to highlight, plod overstepping the mark Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 FAO: Blan & anyone else talking about the right to bare arms - It's not against the law to wear T shirts in this country so we already have that right. If you're talking about bearing arms on the other hand... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 would you break into this guys shop malt? i think not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 I wonder if theses will be charged with assault? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo65wFKIpXY&feature=player_embedded yes i know he's black. if your a bigot,just try and imagine he's your color because they dont have 1 law for them and 1 for us. You see thats where we differ then Blan.....i for one have nothing to hide. If the police were to stop me then they could search me all they like, whats your problem with that. What if they were to find a knife on they guys, a knife that was or could be used to sladh or kill somebody? Is that not reason enough? As for assault ffs come on!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 the big companys do pay tax,they also employ thousands of people.in your ideal world they would move thier business elsewhere.we would be scratching about in the dirt looking for food within a year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 the big companys do pay tax,they also employ thousands of people.in your ideal world they would move thier business elsewhere.we would be scratching about in the dirt looking for food within a year. I've said it before pal, Blan reminds me of 'Dennis the constitutional peasant' Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 the big companys do pay tax,they also employ thousands of people.in your ideal world they would move thier business elsewhere.we would be scratching about in the dirt looking for food within a year. I've said it before pal, Blan reminds me of 'Dennis the constitutional peasant' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOOTKA0aGI0 lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 I wonder if theses will be charged with assault? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo65wFKIpXY&feature=player_embedded yes i know he's black. if your a bigot,just try and imagine he's your color because they dont have 1 law for them and 1 for us. You see thats where we differ then Blan.....i for one have nothing to hide. If the police were to stop me then they could search me all they like, whats your problem with that. What if they were to find a knife on they guys, a knife that was or could be used to sladh or kill somebody? Is that not reason enough? As for assault ffs come on!!!!! so you'd let me search you if i asked? i dont need to hide anything,but i value my right to privacy,its these little compromises that shape the future imo. its not that they're searching me (thats not a major inconvenience to me) its where i think we are heading. this video from about 6 mins on explains my thinking. http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAntiTerrorist#p/u/78/oSJoQJkSd88 the fact is the police are just citizens they arent infallible and have proved time and again the world over they can be very corrupt,giving them any more powers of arrest than any other citizen is imo mistake. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.