blan89 159 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 my issue is with the progressive lack of freedom we experience in this country,and the fact its almost definitely going to get far worse. if the rioters had guns the riot wouldnt of lasted as long,the people who used them to intimidate/attack innocent people would of been (rightfully) shot,either by the communities protecting themselves or the police/army. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,828 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 if the rioters were armed there would have been a shite load of deaths of both inocent and guilty! It would have been a f*****g blood bath! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Night Hunter 109 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 LOOK OVER YER SHOULDER MR CAMERON LOOKS LIKE NO.10 IS GETTING ROBBED...LOL 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 who would of taken the most casualties do you think? the police/army? the innocent people who stayed at home? or the looters/rioters themselves? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chris k 205 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 hmmm. intresting subject this one although i think the thing that really made me luagh was when that mp said - whats the differnce between releasing the army compared to the police. well mr m.p (cant rember your bloody name) the differnce is massive lets see what the rioters make of say a couple of units of para"s in riot gear! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tinytiger 846 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 i think theres a bit more to law and order than you think. a lot less i.m.o -string up all paedophiles,rapists,thieves and murderers-law and order SORTED..All other offences (drugs,traffic etc) were added to the statute books to hide how bad the police are at solving real crimes. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,828 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 who would of taken the most casualties do you think? the police/army? the innocent people who stayed at home? or the looters/rioters themselves? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics There would be alot more deaths of inocent people than there was, thats the point. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ferret-boy 44 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Nope they dont f**k about round here ahha.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Just read in the paper that the police in that clip will be getting investigated...........and so they should be. I'd like to give each one of them a medal and a pay rise for lethering f**k out them. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 heard there was a statement aswell saying any of the looters that were in reciept of housing benefit and council tax rebates,"there will be conseqences"! the thing is the state must be seen to come down hard on these scum.a message to any others thinking of doing the same thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Just read in the paper that the police in that clip will be getting investigated...........and so they should be. I'd like to give each one of them a medal and a pay rise for lethering f**k out them. totally,manchester cops werent gonna be criticised or let it come to the point they were losing control of the situation.we cant see what the lads on the bikes were doing,so no one can say they werent looting of burning cars.you only have the cops word for it.yes thier lying c**ts at times,but due to the current climate.i think we can excuse any over zealous cops.tbh most normal people would be indoors making sure thier family and property were safe.not riding around on bikes.would you let your kids out,when there are mobs running amock. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rake aboot 4,936 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 my issue is with the progressive lack of freedom we experience in this country,and the fact its almost definitely going to get far worse. if the rioters had guns the riot wouldnt of lasted as long,the people who used them to intimidate/attack innocent people would of been (rightfully) shot,either by the communities protecting themselves or the police/army. Yup.. like I said,, what a load of shite !! if the rioters had guns the riot wouldn`t have lasted long !! holy f**k,, what are you on !! so instead of comet getting ransacked,, some young mother at a bus stop woulda got shot in the head !!,, You talk shit. You seem to actually believe that an armed populace could survive without a policeing agency . Hmmm lets make our lifes safer by arming the gang monkeys,, !! yes ,lets !! ffs 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 my issue is with the progressive lack of freedom we experience in this country,and the fact its almost definitely going to get far worse. if the rioters had guns the riot wouldnt of lasted as long,the people who used them to intimidate/attack innocent people would of been (rightfully) shot,either by the communities protecting themselves or the police/army. Yup.. like I said,, what a load of shite !! if the rioters had guns the riot wouldn`t have lasted long !! holy f**k,, what are you on !! so instead of comet getting ransacked,, some young mother at a bus stop woulda got shot in the head !!,, You talk shit. You seem to actually believe that an armed populace could survive without a policeing agency . Hmmm lets make our lifes safer by arming the gang monkeys,, !! yes ,lets !! ffs we probably couldnt (without a lot of casualties) from where we are now but that should be the ultimate goal,you might like being owned and having everything banned or licensed by the government but thats your choice. we dont need to eradicate the police just cut their numbers and all 'special powers'. do you not think there are quite a lot of guns in london as it is? the only difference is they are mainly only available to criminals. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mooch. 177 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Blan you are priceless! This is 21st century Britain, not the 18th century American frontier. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rake aboot 4,936 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Anarchy in the UK ,,eh Blan ?? lawless society and aw that !!,, if you really fancy that,, just head of to Somalia ! you`d fit right in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.