Jump to content

PART 2 OF WILDLIFE PATROL


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The smarmy neanderthal cop "we have taken their airguns off them for testing....That will inconvenience them" what a plum,the lads were apologetic,polite,werent actually commiting any offence whatsoev

you didnt miss anything good unless u like looking at tortoises and stuffed birds of prey ..

seems we run specialist trained dogs,in packs to rip stuff to pieces,at least now i know where i been going wrong all these years

three incidents, the taxidermy, the illegal tortoises and the deer coursing.... not one went to court! the only evidence apparant to me was the waste of tax payers dosh. :thumbdown:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an american bull terrier, could it be american staff.

 

DDA mentions pit bull type. The Am Staff varies very little genetically from the APBT, and the ATTS belieces that there are only minute differences temperment wise between the 2. So dont think that they would differentiate in law. Unless he meant Am bulldog.

 

We never heard the lad say that it was a am bull terrier. Maybe that the copper was prompted to say that by the program makers!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The copper was told the dogs were a mixture of american bulldog and greyhound both very legal breeds, but he chose to use the word american bull terrier probably on purpose for obvious reasons....

I know this because it was my dog.....

Its amazing just how biased that programme is only showing what the antis want to see or here, funny thing is for a programme that is about wildlife crime you would actually think they would show some crime because not one single person was prosecuted on tonights programme

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The copper was told the dogs were a mixture of american bulldog and greyhound both very legal breeds, but he chose to use the word american bull terrier probably on purpose for obvious reasons....

I know this because it was my dog.....

Its amazing just how biased that programme is only showing what the antis want to see or here, funny thing is for a programme that is about wildlife crime you would actually think they would show some crime because not one single person was prosecuted on tonights programme

 

exactly what i said, waste of taxpayers money! although the more i think about it, could that be part of the ploy to get joe public to be more vigilant by making out that without their help they struggle to do anything about it? :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...