Tesco 28 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I cant see a problem with someone shooting a burgular, from the back, front or side on, if more people shot burgulars less people would break into houses to thieve Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I cant see a problem with someone shooting a burgular, from the back, front or side on, if more people shot burgulars less people would break into houses to thieve welcome to dodge city lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
trappa 517 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 At the other side of the argument I know 2 people who were jailed for very, very serious crimes, both were unjustly treated by the courts imo. Its a very dodgy area, The "paedatrician" post proves that there are too many thick, unintelligent halfwits willing to make a lynch mob over a rumour. I think rather than take the law into your own hands, the emphasis should be on the courts and judges handing out punishments befitting the crimes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,025 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I cant see a problem with someone shooting a burgular, from the back, front or side on, if more people shot burgulars less people would break into houses to thieve So if your son got in with the wrong crowd and ended up tagging along with an older lad to a shitty rundown farm to nick a few bits you wouldnt have a problem with him being shot and killed for it....because thats what happened. Lets not make out like nicking a few bobs worth of crap deserves the same punishment as some of the sick disgusting crimes we see.....or maybe your really really ruthless,one of these " dont mess with me types " Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ideation 8,216 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Aye, maybe we should spend less time arguing and talking about lynching folk and work on turning our 'legal system' back into a 'justice system'. Some one i know is a solicitor, he spends everyday getting folk he knows for a fact have committed the crime, off the charges. How the f**k can you do that shit and still happily send your kids off out into the world.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,025 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Aye, maybe we should spend less time arguing and talking about lynching folk and work on turning our 'legal system' back into a 'justice system'. Some one i know is a solicitor, he spends everyday getting folk he knows for a fact have committed the crime, off the charges. How the f**k can you do that shit and still happily send your kids off out into the world.. What,did you think solicitors only tell the truth then Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 but if it was legal he'd know the risks and if he still went ahead then he can face the consequences. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I cant see a problem with someone shooting a burgular, from the back, front or side on, if more people shot burgulars less people would break into houses to thieve So if your son got in with the wrong crowd and ended up tagging along with an older lad to a shitty rundown farm to nick a few bits you wouldnt have a problem with him being shot and killed for it....because thats what happened. Lets not make out like nicking a few bobs worth of crap deserves the same punishment as some of the sick disgusting crimes we see.....or maybe your really really ruthless,one of these " dont mess with me types " think some people forget that their own kids or wee brothers or any member of thier family can quite easily get involved with the wrong crowd or just turn bad themselfs.never broke into anyones house in my life and wouldnt,but i was certainly no angel when i was younger.as i said before that tony martin fellow was not all there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Thing is were do we draw the line like some lads have nearly lost their lives for poaching a few rabbits. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tesco 28 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I cant see a problem with someone shooting a burgular, from the back, front or side on, if more people shot burgulars less people would break into houses to thieve So if your son got in with the wrong crowd and ended up tagging along with an older lad to a shitty rundown farm to nick a few bits you wouldnt have a problem with him being shot and killed for it....because thats what happened. Lets not make out like nicking a few bobs worth of crap deserves the same punishment as some of the sick disgusting crimes we see.....or maybe your really really ruthless,one of these " dont mess with me types " If we wernt so soft on crime and criminals we wouldnt have young kids breaking into other peoples homes and property, its the fact that there are no real deterrents these days thats why we have so many criminals commiting so many crimes, no petty criminal is going to risk getting shot for a few quid or some old dears tv Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,025 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 If we wernt so soft on crime and criminals we wouldnt have young kids breaking into other peoples homes and property, its the fact that there are no real deterrents these days thats why we have so many criminals commiting so many crimes, no petty criminal is going to risk getting shot for a few quid or some old dears tv I agree but you gotta keep it realistic....i mean if a petty thief deserves death....what does a child killing rapist deserve ?...you cant kill him twice !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 I cant see a problem with someone shooting a burgular, from the back, front or side on, if more people shot burgulars less people would break into houses to thieve So if your son got in with the wrong crowd and ended up tagging along with an older lad to a shitty rundown farm to nick a few bits you wouldnt have a problem with him being shot and killed for it....because thats what happened. Lets not make out like nicking a few bobs worth of crap deserves the same punishment as some of the sick disgusting crimes we see.....or maybe your really really ruthless,one of these " dont mess with me types " If we wernt so soft on crime and criminals we wouldnt have young kids breaking into other peoples homes and property, its the fact that there are no real deterrents these days thats why we have so many criminals commiting so many crimes, no petty criminal is going to risk getting shot for a few quid or some old dears tv disagree mate,if someone is desperate to rob you they will regardless of the deterrent.you only have to look at the death penalty in the states or the 3 strike rule they have.if i was awoken one night and was faced with some teenager robbing my telly do you think i would be justified killing him over a poxy f*****g telly? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tesco 28 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Dont have to die just cos they been shot, I know in reality we're not going to start shooting petty criminals but I'd bet there would be a massive reduction in crime if it was an option. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Dont have to die just cos they been shot, I know in reality we're not going to start shooting petty criminals but I'd bet there would be a massive reduction in crime if it was an option. the flip side to that is they break into your house carrying a shooter.and there we have chaos Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ideation 8,216 Posted April 29, 2011 Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Dont have to die just cos they been shot, I know in reality we're not going to start shooting petty criminals but I'd bet there would be a massive reduction in crime if it was an option. the flip side to that is they break into your house carrying a shooter.and there we have chaos Yer, look at America. The idea that if you tool people up, then crime will fall, is completely wrong. Crime will ALWAYS exist in some form, and like you say, if some desperate f****r is going to rob you and he knows you have a hand gun, he's gonna bring a shotty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.