Doggy men hierarchy

[danw 1,748]

iceman its the method used in the book danny the champion of the world crackn book loved resding it when a was a young lad. but a didnt think the sleeping tabs would work a might have to try it and find out for meself.

 

 

Aye thats right most poaching only ever exists in fiction books LOL :tongue2:

 

 

or on the reality interweb sensation that is the hunting life where your dreams become reality

 

:laugh:

[fieldsman 51]

Gotta be the the wankers just running gear and leaving it where it falls! what is the point in killing it ? same with the lazy fuckers who do the same when their shooting! theirs no point!

Your quote to the best of my knowledge refers to nearly all well known day walkers few have land and travel miles to lincs to walk land and leave what they kill I have found on a many occasions heaps of dead hare.When I,v asked through the grapevine who,s been in the area it,s always a well known name and their hangers on .None take their catches home .Even if they have permission they cannot be arsed to carry an air rifle so as to have a reason for taking them home .

[J Darcy 5,871]

f*****g hell artic, why not put your rank numbers on and be done with it lol.

 

Don't be silly petal, just having wild thoughts.

 

Darcy, there are many loop holes like I have said earlier, If your friend owns the land, then we have trespass with intent. It's a big old rule book, and it can send you round the twist , BUT there will always be a Charge for an offence. Leave that to the CPS.

 

 

 

artic, the question i asked was whether the earlier statement about owning the pheasant because it is on your land is incorrect or not?

Law has always held a particular interest to me, I could debate about it til the cows come home. I guess that you are agreeing that no wild animal or bird can be owned?

[TOMO 26,681]

Gotta be the the wankers just running gear and leaving it where it falls! what is the point in killing it ? same with the lazy fuckers who do the same when their shooting! theirs no point!

Your quote to the best of my knowledge refers to nearly all well known day walkers few have land and travel miles to lincs to walk land and leave what they kill I have found on a many occasions heaps of dead hare.When I,v asked through the grapevine who,s been in the area it,s always a well known name and their hangers on .None take their catches home .Even if they have permission they cannot be arsed to carry an air rifle so as to have a reason for taking them home .

 

your right mate its a great shame about guys leaving hares,,,, but this is a new thing realy, and down to the government banning coursing,,, and guys loosing dogs and cars becuase they had a hare in there motor.

[iceman001979 1,316]

Gotta be the the wankers just running gear and leaving it where it falls! what is the point in killing it ? same with the lazy fuckers who do the same when their shooting! theirs no point!

Your quote to the best of my knowledge refers to nearly all well known day walkers few have land and travel miles to lincs to walk land and leave what they kill I have found on a many occasions heaps of dead hare.When I,v asked through the grapevine who,s been in the area it,s always a well known name and their hangers on .None take their catches home .Even if they have permission they cannot be arsed to carry an air rifle so as to have a reason for taking them home .

 

your right mate its a great shame about guys leaving hares,,,, but this is a new thing realy, and down to the government banning coursing,,, and guys loosing dogs and cars becuase they had a hare in there motor.

A lot off people do it over here as well l cant stand it there is good feeding off a hare for man or dog but as TOMO said no one wants there car or van stopped full off hares and the trouble it can bring with it.

Why dont people bring knife and cut them up at the end off the day takes 10 mins

[TOMO 26,681]

 

nowt wrong with feeding the hares to your dogs at the end of the day, befor you drive home,,,, provided of course your dogs arnt pukers

[artic 595]

f*****g hell artic, why not put your rank numbers on and be done with it lol.

 

Don't be silly petal, just having wild thoughts.

 

Darcy, there are many loop holes like I have said earlier, If your friend owns the land, then we have trespass with intent. It's a big old rule book, and it can send you round the twist , BUT there will always be a Charge for an offence. Leave that to the CPS.

 

 

 

artic, the question i asked was whether the earlier statement about owning the pheasant because it is on your land is incorrect or not?

Law has always held a particular interest to me, I could debate about it til the cows come home. I guess that you are agreeing that no wild animal or bird can be owned?

 

Darcy, you keep mentioning "Owning", so Iets not forget that "To Own" something means property. Now property can be real or personal.

 

Wild creatues/animals however you wish to call them are property, wheather they have been tamed, or kept in captivity. Once they have been lost, or abandoned and lets say come onto your land, then how do you prove who's property it is? 9 times out of 10 you won't do, unless someone claims that it is there's and can prove it. I.e a dog.

 

A quick senario, you shoot, in season 2 pheasants on your land, the keeper next door calls the police and states the 2 birds you shot are his. If the police have time for such a silly matter, they would turn up and ask the keeper if he could prove they are his. He does so, by means of tags under each wing. Are you going to get arrested for this? Of course not, it would be silly to, because, the birds are "Wild" and once released and move onto others land they do not become the PROPERTY of the keeper, they become yours. (Poaching is a different matter all together).

 

I've just touched on this, like I said it's very difficult to put to text.

 

Law has been an interest to me too Darcy, for a long time!

[Lab 10,979]

f*****g hell artic, why not put your rank numbers on and be done with it lol.

 

Don't be silly petal, just having wild thoughts.

 

Darcy, there are many loop holes like I have said earlier, If your friend owns the land, then we have trespass with intent. It's a big old rule book, and it can send you round the twist , BUT there will always be a Charge for an offence. Leave that to the CPS.

 

 

 

artic, the question i asked was whether the earlier statement about owning the pheasant because it is on your land is incorrect or not?

Law has always held a particular interest to me, I could debate about it til the cows come home. I guess that you are agreeing that no wild animal or bird can be owned?

 

Darcy, you keep mentioning "Owning", so Iets not forget that "To Own" something means property. Now property can be real or personal.

 

Wild creatues/animals however you wish to call them are property, wheather they have been tamed, or kept in captivity. Once they have been lost, or abandoned and lets say come onto your land, then how do you prove who's property it is? 9 times out of 10 you won't do, unless someone claims that it is there's and can prove it. I.e a dog.

 

A quick senario, you shoot, in season 2 pheasants on your land, the keeper next door calls the police and states the 2 birds you shot are his. If the police have time for such a silly matter, they would turn up and ask the keeper if he could prove they are his. He does so, by means of tags under each wing. Are you going to get arrested for this? Of course not, it would be silly to, because, the birds are "Wild" and once released and move onto others land they do not become the PROPERTY of the keeper, they become yours. (Poaching is a different matter all together).

 

I've just touched on this, like I said it's very difficult to put to text.

 

Law has been a interest to me too Darcy, for a long time!

Just like the legal ban on running dogs on deer and hare...... It's wrong!!!!!

[Born Hunter 17,798]

f*****g hell artic, why not put your rank numbers on and be done with it lol.

 

Don't be silly petal, just having wild thoughts.

 

Darcy, there are many loop holes like I have said earlier, If your friend owns the land, then we have trespass with intent. It's a big old rule book, and it can send you round the twist , BUT there will always be a Charge for an offence. Leave that to the CPS.

 

 

 

artic, the question i asked was whether the earlier statement about owning the pheasant because it is on your land is incorrect or not?

Law has always held a particular interest to me, I could debate about it til the cows come home. I guess that you are agreeing that no wild animal or bird can be owned?

 

Darcy, you keep mentioning "Owning", so Iets not forget that "To Own" something means property. Now property can be real or personal.

 

Wild creatues/animals however you wish to call them are property, wheather they have been tamed, or kept in captivity. Once they have been lost, or abandoned and lets say come onto your land, then how do you prove who's property it is? 9 times out of 10 you won't do, unless someone claims that it is there's and can prove it. I.e a dog.

 

A quick senario, you shoot, in season 2 pheasants on your land, the keeper next door calls the police and states the 2 birds you shot are his. If the police have time for such a silly matter, they would turn up and ask the keeper if he could prove they are his. He does so, by means of tags under each wing. Are you going to get arrested for this? Of course not, it would be silly to, because, the birds are "Wild" and once released and move onto others land they do not become the PROPERTY of the keeper, they become yours. (Poaching is a different matter all together).

 

I've just touched on this, like I said it's very difficult to put to text.

 

Law has been a interest to me too Darcy, for a long time!

 

They become the property of th eland owner whos land they wer killed on! Which is exactly the point darcy has been trying to make. Untill they are killed they are wild and as such belong to nobody, so are free to cross boundaries at their will. They only become property once killed or in captivity and that depends entirely on whos land that happens on.

[Bogger 243]

you cant say there yours artic but putting feeders/catchers out on the edge of a shoot is a pee take to put it lightly an usualy good keepers wont do it to eachother its just bad manners

[artic 595]

f*****g hell artic, why not put your rank numbers on and be done with it lol.

 

Don't be silly petal, just having wild thoughts.

 

Darcy, there are many loop holes like I have said earlier, If your friend owns the land, then we have trespass with intent. It's a big old rule book, and it can send you round the twist , BUT there will always be a Charge for an offence. Leave that to the CPS.

 

 

 

artic, the question i asked was whether the earlier statement about owning the pheasant because it is on your land is incorrect or not?

Law has always held a particular interest to me, I could debate about it til the cows come home. I guess that you are agreeing that no wild animal or bird can be owned?

 

Darcy, you keep mentioning "Owning", so Iets not forget that "To Own" something means property. Now property can be real or personal.

 

Wild creatues/animals however you wish to call them are property, wheather they have been tamed, or kept in captivity. Once they have been lost, or abandoned and lets say come onto your land, then how do you prove who's property it is? 9 times out of 10 you won't do, unless someone claims that it is there's and can prove it. I.e a dog.

 

A quick senario, you shoot, in season 2 pheasants on your land, the keeper next door calls the police and states the 2 birds you shot are his. If the police have time for such a silly matter, they would turn up and ask the keeper if he could prove they are his. He does so, by means of tags under each wing. Are you going to get arrested for this? Of course not, it would be silly to, because, the birds are "Wild" and once released and move onto others land they do not become the PROPERTY of the keeper, they become yours. (Poaching is a different matter all together).

 

I've just touched on this, like I said it's very difficult to put to text.

 

Law has been a interest to me too Darcy, for a long time!

 

They become the property of th eland owner whos land they wer killed on! Which is exactly the point darcy has been trying to make. Untill they are killed they are wild and as such belong to nobody, so are free to cross boundaries at their will. They only become property once killed or in captivity and that depends entirely on whos land that happens on.

 

Like I said I have only touched on the subject.

 

The question was answered a long while back...I think.

 

Be legal and you can't go wrong, and if your not sure, or you have concerns about who owns what and how, then go to your nearest police staion and ask the WLO.

[baw 4,360]

you cant say there yours artic but putting feeders/catchers out on the edge of a shoot is a pee take to put it lightly an usualy good keepers wont do it to eachother its just bad manners

 

Are you a keeper bogger?

[artic 595]

you cant say there yours artic but putting feeders/catchers out on the edge of a shoot is a pee take to put it lightly an usualy good keepers wont do it to eachother its just bad manners

 

Are you a keeper bogger?

 

Bogger has a habit Baw.....eh Bogger

 

[johnny boy68 11,726]

Hierarchy ..........not in my world.

 

Those who do it,do it.......those who don't talk about it,generally on THL

 

Now if you'll excuse me I'm off to shoot some roosting pheasants and lamp a few milky hares

[danw 1,748]

you cant say there yours artic but putting feeders/catchers out on the edge of a shoot is a pee take to put it lightly an usualy good keepers wont do it to eachother its just bad manners

 

squirt or 2 of deisel on the pophole or feeder and they ain't getting nothing