Shazza 52 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Considering how many dogs have been stolen or lost and so few have been found i was wondering why so many of these dogs are not micro-chipped. (not having a go at anyone who has had a dog nicked ) Chipping gives a far greater chance of getting your dog back if lost and also proves ownership if they were stolen. From experience a few years ago, the Police will not even be interested if the dog hasn't got permanent identification to prove ownership even if you tell them where it is, possesion is 9/10ths of the law I am qualified to micro-chip and do a lot of dogs but i've never been asked to do any lurchers except my own. Quote Link to post
Born Hunter 17,751 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 There is a line of thought that by not having ya dogs chipped stops trouble being brought to your door if a heavily marked dog does a runner. Some people arnt willing to take that risk. Personally I dont go along with it, I would sooner get my dogs back. Quote Link to post
Strong Stuff 2,171 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Have been lucky and never had a dog stolen (they'd soon bring them back anyway! ) But, microchipping isn't foolproof or permanent, I couldn't believe how easily they are removed. I'll be looking for someone to tattoo my latest dog in a few months, he is chipped too, I think a tattoo would be more difficult to remove. Quote Link to post
mike1458 14 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Same as born hunter says. The people who run bigger quarry and loose their dogs, do not want the police tracing it back to them so people tend not to do it. ATB Mike Quote Link to post
Shazza 52 Posted March 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Had dogs tattoo'd in the past for security work as identification had to be visible for the licence but even these can be altered and they are often hard to read (especially on long or rough-coated doogs or those with small ears) Saying that, if you have them chipped & tattoo'd then someone would have to really want your dog to alter/remove two things linking the dog to you Quote Link to post
JPTfellterrier 65 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 my dogs microchip cost me £22 or somthing and for the sake of just over 20 quid it will make it more likley that if the worst ever happened i could get not only my dog but my best friend back How do people get the dogs to stay still while being tattooed? Quote Link to post
Shazza 52 Posted March 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Think of a hand held vice, they insert the letters & numbers into the little vice, each digit is made up a dozen or more needles. They then crimp the whole thing through the dogs ear (needles dont go all the way through) the antiseptic dye is then sponged over the inside of the dogs ear and must be kept dry for 48 hours so the dye gets into all the pin holes and when wiped off the tattoo'd details are visible. Have seen 8 dogs tattoo'd and they all screamed like f**k (1 adult, rest puppies) they soon forgot about it but it was worse imo than micro-chipping. Quote Link to post
Shazza 52 Posted March 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 JP 22 quid is expensive (but still worth it. I charge 15 for a single dog, 12 for 3 or more done at the same time. That includes the owner registration Quote Link to post
Buch 145 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 My vets is pretty good. I got a prelim checkup, first vaccine and a chip for 30 odd quid. Quote Link to post
tb25 4,627 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 a tenna for chips here Quote Link to post
buster 8789 64 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 some councils will chip your dog free of charge. Quote Link to post
shepp 2,285 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 It would take a few seconds for a dog thief to remove a chip. Quote Link to post
fordie 8 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 one of my dogs went missing never heard of him he was microchip all mine are microchip still dont know were he is now well gutted I think tattos are the best thing Quote Link to post
Gaz_1989 9,539 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 As said above if someone wants your dog enough they will remove a chip. I think tattoo is harder to remove but ive heard of it done. At the end of the day the chip will only really help out if you have located your dog after theft. And if you have done that then why involve police? I guess its different if your dog gets lost and authorities scan it. But talking about theft, I think chipping is pointless. Gaz Quote Link to post
Fabapocalypse 35 Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Have been lucky and never had a dog stolen (they'd soon bring them back anyway! ) But, microchipping isn't foolproof or permanent, I couldn't believe how easily they are removed. I'll be looking for someone to tattoo my latest dog in a few months, he is chipped too, I think a tattoo would be more difficult to remove. Ears are a lot easier to remove than microchips. Happens in the greyhound world a fair bit, poor beggars... Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.