scothunter 12,609 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 you say vulnerable i say weak minded 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oldred58 340 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 He commited a crime, he got caught, he deserves a prison sentence but 18yrs with more to serve I think it is far too long, peado's get less for raping children in this country! I don't think people should get high and mighty saying he should be shot etc, how many people on here poach (don't answer that one lol) what if the minimum sentence for killing any wildlife was 10yrs, would you lads still be out at night with your dogs.............of course you would, would you deserve such a long sentence.....................no, would you be complaining from your cell.......hell yeah!! I know it is a completly different scenario but some people think drugs/dealers/users are scum of the earth, others think hunters are, unless you live a completly squeaky lifestyle don't be so quick to judge others and knock people down, as Bob Marley famously said â€Who are you to judge the life I live? I know I'm not perfect and I don't live to be. But, before you start pointing fingers, make sure your hands are clean.†I bet everyone on here knows someone that likes a smoke, you just might not realise, not everyone shouts about it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
reddawn 2,173 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 lets all remeber somebody somewhere is sitting judging all us, orrible barbaric animal killers just becuase something has been banned, or dont have everybodys approval, dont mean to say its wrong 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 (edited) you say vulnerable i say weak minded Vulnerable, f**k up or weak minded take your pick, it don't make much a difference IMO. The entire western world thrives off peoples weaknesses to keep itself nice and plump. We've all got our weaknesses mate. My major weakness is hairspray to keep my mullet looking nice and neat . Edited December 29, 2011 by Attack Fell Terrier 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 What difference does it make to your life what someone else chooses to ingest? hard or soft,no-one forces anyone to take drugs. so why should you the state or anyone else get involved in someone elses business? Thats true..........they can do what they like, especially as we are talking about a bit weed here. Problem i have is with the smackheads...there was an article in the paper the other day about a young girl who had a £400 a day habit....wonder how she funded that then?.... Feck knows, i doubt someone who uses that much would be capable of making that much money by any means. i'd like everyone to be responsible for their own actions,i got stopped by a pcso the other day backing out of the drive without my seatbelt on,who does that effect apart from me? same with drugs,only the user suffers because of they're stupidity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 What difference does it make to your life what someone else chooses to ingest? hard or soft,no-one forces anyone to take drugs. so why should you the state or anyone else get involved in someone elses business? Thats true..........they can do what they like, especially as we are talking about a bit weed here. Problem i have is with the smackheads...there was an article in the paper the other day about a young girl who had a £400 a day habit....wonder how she funded that then?.... ... same with drugs,only the user suffers because of they're stupidity. That's like saying if you got murdered, it wouldn't matter because it would only be you that got stabbed / shot / battered to death etc... Do you not think the people that care about the drug abuser don't suffer? How about the users parents, partner or children? Don't you think they suffer? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 you say vulnerable i say weak minded Vulnerable, f**k up or weak minded take your pick, it don't make much a difference IMO. The entire western world thrives off peoples weaknesses to keep itself nice and plump. We've all got our weaknesses mate. My major weakness is hairspray to keep my mullet looking nice and neat . lol keep it short mate save on the hairspray Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 What difference does it make to your life what someone else chooses to ingest? hard or soft,no-one forces anyone to take drugs. so why should you the state or anyone else get involved in someone elses business? Thats true..........they can do what they like, especially as we are talking about a bit weed here. Problem i have is with the smackheads...there was an article in the paper the other day about a young girl who had a £400 a day habit....wonder how she funded that then?.... ... same with drugs,only the user suffers because of they're stupidity. That's like saying if you got murdered, it wouldn't matter because it would only be you that got stabbed / shot / battered to death etc... Do you not think the people that care about the drug abuser don't suffer? How about the users parents, partner or children? Don't you think they suffer? no it's not,if i choose to risk my life with no increased risk to anyone else,it should be my choice. there's plenty of legal ways for me to do it. the only sensible argument i can see is social responsibility (ambulance and nhs costs) but I think we can safely say socialism doesn't work. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 What difference does it make to your life what someone else chooses to ingest? hard or soft,no-one forces anyone to take drugs. so why should you the state or anyone else get involved in someone elses business? Thats true..........they can do what they like, especially as we are talking about a bit weed here. Problem i have is with the smackheads...there was an article in the paper the other day about a young girl who had a £400 a day habit....wonder how she funded that then?.... ... same with drugs,only the user suffers because of they're stupidity. That's like saying if you got murdered, it wouldn't matter because it would only be you that got stabbed / shot / battered to death etc... Do you not think the people that care about the drug abuser don't suffer? How about the users parents, partner or children? Don't you think they suffer? no it's not,if i choose to risk my life with no increased risk to anyone else,it should be my choice. there's plenty of legal ways for me to do it. the only sensible argument i can see is social responsibility (ambulance and nhs costs) but I think we can safely say socialism doesn't work. Argument for what mate? I just thought I'd point out that it isn't just the users that suffer when someone abuses drugs in a lot of cases. If you killed yourself through abusing drugs what do you think your loved ones would think? "Oh he went doing what he loved best" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LolaPat 49 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 The punishment for the level of the crime was harsh but at the end of the day he knew what he was doing when he did it so... Its his own fault and he should hope the lest half of his sentence is better than the first. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 What difference does it make to your life what someone else chooses to ingest? hard or soft,no-one forces anyone to take drugs. so why should you the state or anyone else get involved in someone elses business? Thats true..........they can do what they like, especially as we are talking about a bit weed here. Problem i have is with the smackheads...there was an article in the paper the other day about a young girl who had a £400 a day habit....wonder how she funded that then?.... ... same with drugs,only the user suffers because of they're stupidity. That's like saying if you got murdered, it wouldn't matter because it would only be you that got stabbed / shot / battered to death etc... Do you not think the people that care about the drug abuser don't suffer? How about the users parents, partner or children? Don't you think they suffer? no it's not,if i choose to risk my life with no increased risk to anyone else,it should be my choice. there's plenty of legal ways for me to do it. the only sensible argument i can see is social responsibility (ambulance and nhs costs) but I think we can safely say socialism doesn't work. Argument for what mate? I just thought I'd point out that it isn't just the users that suffer when someone abuses drugs in a lot of cases. If you killed yourself through abusing drugs what do you think your loved ones would think? "Oh he went doing what he loved best" argument for the state poking it's nose into every aspect of your life,and taking your control of it away from you. if someone died of an OD I'd be willing to bet they're family would be no more upset than the family of someone who died rock climbing,bass jumping,or at war. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 (edited) What difference does it make to your life what someone else chooses to ingest? hard or soft,no-one forces anyone to take drugs. so why should you the state or anyone else get involved in someone elses business? Thats true..........they can do what they like, especially as we are talking about a bit weed here. Problem i have is with the smackheads...there was an article in the paper the other day about a young girl who had a £400 a day habit....wonder how she funded that then?.... ... same with drugs,only the user suffers because of they're stupidity. That's like saying if you got murdered, it wouldn't matter because it would only be you that got stabbed / shot / battered to death etc... Do you not think the people that care about the drug abuser don't suffer? How about the users parents, partner or children? Don't you think they suffer? no it's not,if i choose to risk my life with no increased risk to anyone else,it should be my choice. there's plenty of legal ways for me to do it. the only sensible argument i can see is social responsibility (ambulance and nhs costs) but I think we can safely say socialism doesn't work. Argument for what mate? I just thought I'd point out that it isn't just the users that suffer when someone abuses drugs in a lot of cases. If you killed yourself through abusing drugs what do you think your loved ones would think? "Oh he went doing what he loved best" argument for the state poking it's nose into every aspect of your life,and taking your control of it away from you. if someone died of an OD I'd be willing to bet they're family would be no more upset than the family of someone who died rock climbing,bass jumping,or at war. OK pal I think we've gone as far as we can with this discussion (sensibly) as we can go. But I can't see how you can equate dying for Queen and Country and serving your country, to being a selfish junky who's overdosed and died. Edited December 30, 2011 by Attack Fell Terrier Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 blans eutopia is a lawless everyman for themsels. a cache of guns and no authority whatsover. no matter we would be living like dogs and no infrastructure to speak of. might come as a shock to you mate,but it would be a shit state of affairs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blan89 159 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Serving your country? even if you actually believe that (from someone who's 'served') both paths were chosen by the individual. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Serving your country? even if you actually believe that (from someone who's 'served') both paths were chosen by the individual. Can you not see how one is of some use and is doing good for their country, and the other is just a burden to those that love him and society (in most cases). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.