snoopdog 1,256 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacherjim 0 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 my heads done in now goin for a mooch Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest oldskool Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snoopdog 1,256 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 toad was this dog at york hunt mate...???? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest toad Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 toad was this dog at york hunt mate...???? no mate,not been hear the place,i had it from 6 wks old Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HBG 350 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? i dont know anything much about greyhounds,so are most derby winners sons/daughters of derby winners? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snoopdog 1,256 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 toad was this dog at york hunt mate...???? no mate,not been hear the place,i had it from 6 wks old looks its double mate sorry wrong dog ...very smart dog tho... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Mears 272 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 are you outline breeding mate :thumbs-up: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snoopdog 1,256 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? i dont know anything much about greyhounds,so are most derby winners sons/daughters of derby winners? its like any type of breeding if you have a winner the they breed it with another winner to try and produce a winner just like they do with peddiegries spellt wrong again ...but its got to be PROVEN... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HBG 350 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? i dont know anything much about greyhounds,so are most derby winners sons/daughters of derby winners? its like any type of breeding if you have a winner the they breed it with another winner to try and produce a winner just like they do with peddiegries spellt wrong again ...but its got to be PROVEN... but does it work professor? :11: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snoopdog 1,256 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? i dont know anything much about greyhounds,so are most derby winners sons/daughters of derby winners? its like any type of breeding if you have a winner the they breed it with another winner to try and produce a winner just like they do with peddiegries spellt wrong again ...but its got to be PROVEN... but does it work professor? :11: OF COARSE IT WORKS MOST OF THE TIME.. ..but every no and then you have to throw a none winner in amongst them so you dont have interbreeding..but its got to be provern in other ways ..theres that key word provern... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Mears 272 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 you dont need to interbreedthe best way to get around it is to line breed. Line breeding is when the sire and the dam are distantly related: e.g., grandsire to granddaughter, granddam to grandson, second cousins, half cousins, uncle to niece, aunt to nephew..... The general strategy is that there is a common ancestor that is being doubled up on both sides. So the desired dog appears several times in the pedigree. was talking to a bloke with a couple of dogs taught me one or 2 things lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
axle 63 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? i dont know anything much about greyhounds,so are most derby winners sons/daughters of derby winners? its like any type of breeding if you have a winner the they breed it with another winner to try and produce a winner just like they do with peddiegries spellt wrong again ...but its got to be PROVEN... but does it work professor? :11: OF COARSE IT WORKS MOST OF THE TIME.. ..but every no and then you have to throw a none winner in amongst them so you dont have interbreeding..but its got to be provern in other ways ..theres that key word provern... And then you have the freak....... the fantastic dog bred from a load of crap and will only ever produce a load of crap........ sometimes the best worker isn't the one to go to for the best results, oh and while i'm at it, why have so many Greyhound Derby winners been failures at stud despite being bred from the best :whistle: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snoopdog 1,256 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 so back to it,are we saying then greyhound derby winner x greyhound derby winner will produce derby winners? they have a better chance of produceing a winner than a none derby winner ... the greyhound men wouldnt spend fortunes of cash on services to the derby winner if there wasnt a chance of getting another derby winner from the breeding??? i dont know anything much about greyhounds,so are most derby winners sons/daughters of derby winners? its like any type of breeding if you have a winner the they breed it with another winner to try and produce a winner just like they do with peddiegries spellt wrong again ...but its got to be PROVEN... but does it work professor? :11: OF COARSE IT WORKS MOST OF THE TIME.. ..but every no and then you have to throw a none winner in amongst them so you dont have interbreeding..but its got to be provern in other ways ..theres that key word provern... And then you have the freak....... the fantastic dog bred from a load of crap and will only ever produce a load of crap........ sometimes the best worker isn't the one to go to for the best results, oh and while i'm at it, why have so many Greyhound Derby winners been failures at stud despite being bred from the best :whistle: your right about a freak ive wittnessed one in the field.... it was the best dog i ever so and the sire and dam were shite..spot on mate... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HBG 350 Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 Right get this.......the one word that is missing. It matters not a jot how good your dogs are if they are notPREPOTENT they wont produce like wise. Hence some dogs are more PREPOTENT than others and are then capable of producing better than themselves. Top studs/broods are not always the best workers. spot on,ive bred off the best dog i've ever seen and it as never produced a good pup,and the best dog i've had is off a bull that was owned by a pot head that had never shown any aggression or seen any work(the bull i mean lol) and a failed track greyhound.strange world is the dog world. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.