girl throws puppys in a river

[mick81 275]

i smell a RAT.

[6pack 60]

respect's definition is a matter of opinion, im talking about keeping moral attitudes concerning how you treat property down to the individual,not telling people how to think,feel etc.

 

 

Then I am shocked by your lack of morality.

[bird 9,931]

Im glad my thread has gone quiet , theres some right twats writing on this one .

 

 

you are right regards TWATS, if it was real or not, it was humans at its lowest form. And to vid it is as sick as sick fecker throwing them in. When breeding working dogs, some pups are culled.But do it humane, and behind closed doors, other wise leave feckin dogs+ working dogs alone

[the flump 0]

if you truly understand the concept of animal rights and what that would entail and the effect it would have on human right's yet still support it you are imo a deluded freedon hating individual.

 

I have my own morality/opinion's they may not be the same as your's,however, i unlike you would not try to legislate my own moral's/opinion,especially when it concern's PROPERTY.

[bird 9,931]

if you truly understand the concept of animal rights and what that would entail and the effect it would have on human right's yet still support it you are imo a deluded freedon hating individual.

 

I have my own morality/opinion's they may not be the same as your's,however, i unlike you would not try to legislate my own moral's/opinion,especially when it concern's PROPERTY.

 

 

mate if you dont think its a cruel act, i couldn give f**k about property, you need f****n culling fact .And this aint net talking, i will meet+talk with you fact

[Richie10 345]

Flump is right about the growing power of animal charities and these new vids and the controversy behind them is giving them weight.

Cruelty has always happened and people view cruelty in different ways, Peta believe keeping pets is cruel I would refrain from bringing these issues up.

We are on a hunting site and many people will see this as double standards.

[scothunter 12,609]

as ive already said to you flump well go and throw a few pups in a river and tell the police that your well within your rights as its your property.see what happens to you!

[MAIN MAN 277]

they may have been unwanted pups but this was not the way to cull them she shows no remorse whatsoever infact looks like shes enjoying it. its kicking off all over the net she is getting death threats from all over the world wont be long till she is caught fancy posting it on the net :doh: dont watch the video if your faint hearted

 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/peggy/crazy-puppy-throwing-girl

Thats the most cruel thing i have seen for a long time, i hope she gets a fukin good booting for it.

[scothunter 12,609]

Flump is right about the growing power of animal charities and these new vids and the controversy behind them is giving them weight.

Cruelty has always happened and people view cruelty in different ways, Peta believe keeping pets is cruel I would refrain from bringing these issues up.

We are on a hunting site and many people will see this as double standards.

 

 

his original shite he posted was f**k all to do with keeping animals.he was saying as those pups were someones property she was entitled to do whtaever she saw fit fit them.well all i can say is any c**t who would do that is clearly suffering from some kind of mental illness.same old shite though anyone who condems an act of cruelty on here is immedietly quoted with the usual peta and lacs bullshit.well heres one that aint gonna change my mind in case it dont fit in with the hunting fraternity.any person who knowingly makes an animal suffer or blatantly is cruel to one is a c**t!

[the flump 0]

i agree with your last line scothunter,but different people have different moral's,can you agree with that? And as long as it doesnt affect people or infringe on our right's we should be able to live,think ,act and treat our property as we see fit.

now i wouldnt see it as acceptable to treat my property like that,but that's my prerogative,i also personally find gay people disgusting but i would never try to legislate on how they act/think/feel etc

 

do you genuinely not understand my point?

[scothunter 12,609]

i agree with your last line scothunter,but different people have different moral's,can you agree with that? And as long as it doesnt affect people or infringe on our right's we should be able to live,think ,act and treat our property as we see fit.

now i wouldnt see it as acceptable to treat my property like that,but that's my prerogative,i also personally find gay people disgusting but i would never try to legislate on how they act/think/feel etc

 

do you genuinely not understand my point?

 

although i concede that your property is just that ie it be a dog or an inanimate object,well that does not give you the right to to treat any livestock in your possesion to unnecesary cruelty.and i gather by what your saying that what that girl did was up to her and it was right to do so,then not only is she a c**t but you are aswell.anyway i dont think you joined this site for anything other than to cause trouble.your well dodgy.

[the flump 0]

although i concede that your property is just that ie it be a dog or an inanimate object,well that does not give you the right to to treat any livestock in your possesion to unnecesary cruelty.

 

so i can safely say you do not believe you should be able to treat your property as you see fit, and that we should have the moral's of the government of the time imprinted onto our human right's.

 

thanks for clarifying.

[6pack 60]

although i concede that your property is just that ie it be a dog or an inanimate object,well that does not give you the right to to treat any livestock in your possesion to unnecesary cruelty.

 

so i can safely say you do not believe you should be able to treat your property as you see fit, and that we should have the moral's of the government of the time imprinted onto our human right's.

 

thanks for clarifying.

 

Scothunter - hats off to you. Even in plain English he just doesn't get it!

 

Flump, you are an animal activists wet dream.

[the flump 0]

ok why dont i have the right to do with my property as i see fit (in 1 sentence please)

 

and how am i an animal right's activist's dream? by trying to spread the idea that animal right's (and welfare legislation) infringe human right's?

i have the capability to understand your emotion based argument,you cannot understand my logic based one.

[andyfr1968 772]

i agree with your last line scothunter,but different people have different moral's,can you agree with that? And as long as it doesnt affect people or infringe on our right's we should be able to live,think ,act and treat our property as we see fit.

now i wouldnt see it as acceptable to treat my property like that,but that's my prerogative,i also personally find gay people disgusting but i would never try to legislate on how they act/think/feel etc

 

do you genuinely not understand my point?

 

What the hell has gay people got to do with it???

Your whole argument is based on the premis of an animal being nothing other than property in the same way as an inanimate object is.... An animal suffers, it feels pain, fear, joy, love, do you need me to go on?? An inanimate object does not and based on those two facts your argument it utterly flawed and invalid.

I wish you well, flump and I really hope that you get the help you need very soon.....