SHOTGUNSNIPER 47 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 GENERAL TALK = ONLY CERTAIN OPINIONS ARE ALLOWED AND POLITICTICAL CORRECTNESS WILL BE OBSERVRRED OR ELSE... Link to post Share on other sites
steveS.Yorks 161 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Where have I said I condone any kind of abuse. The problem with your argument is that as soon as someone disagrees with you accuse them of siding with the other side, which isn't very grown up is it. As for your source of info aft I think it was, one guy's view is hardly conclusive evidence of mass abuse of children...and what did he do...he walked away...none of his business he said now that to me is condoning abuse. The very least he could have made a phone call. The strange thing is I agree with you on the sheira law issue...funny old world ain't it Take some time to read this mate,this is how shiera law treats women and children abused by a muslim man. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1197478/Sharia-law-UK--How-Islam-dispensing-justice-side-British-courts.html so what your saying is that if you report someone of the muslim persuasion say for example raping someone the police wont deal with it? This is a fact sunshine,in my town 7 muslim men aged from 17 to 28 have been arrested for grooming and having sex with girls aged from 11 to 14,when one 11 YEAR OLD girl became pregnant her grandfather went to the police,they told him to "keep her off street corners" and refused to act,the grandfather asked the BNP for help and their lawyers got on the case. The judge condemned the CPS/police because it took 8 months to get the case in court,he remanded the muslims saying "this abuse could warrant a life sentance" at the first hearing in crown court the judge released them on bail? Dont know whats happening with the case now because its gone quiet,no reports as far as ive seen,no doubt they are trying to brush it under the carpet in the name of community cohesion. Traitors like you are as bad as them and the reason they get away with it. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 (edited) Ug that was a very decent reply it's a pity more don't follow your lead before opening their gobs. I don't think there is such a thing as British culture. You have english culture, scotish Irish & welsh cultures as well as a horde of Italians, Jews, poles and Lithuanians. Then we come to Indians and Africans west Indians & Chinese I could go on but I,m sure you get my point. My family were originally from Ireland but came to Scotland many many years ago. The Irish and in particular Irish Catholics were treated like vermin. To this day there are still sections of society that don't like Catholics. Britain is the only country in the world were it is enshrined in law to openly discriminate against a religion and it isn't Muslim. Anyway in answer to your question I have no political leanings I think politicians should be made fight the wars they start. Ian not particularly religious either but technically speaking I'm a christain. I suppose I'm what you would call a heavy cynic and don't automatically believe what the media or people tell me unless I can see with my own two eyes or someone shows me irrefutable proof. As I said enjoy your new life. Edited July 29, 2010 by undisputed Link to post Share on other sites
unlacedgecko 1,467 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 No worries mate. So do you consider yourself Irish, Scottish or British? I was born in Northern England. However, as far as families go, I haven't got a clue where mine come from originally. My mother is from Northern England as well, but I have only ever met one of my grandparents. Not that it bothers me. I hold a British passport, and have always considered myself as British. Nothing wrong with being a cynic. I'm told I'm pretty cynical myself. When I say Im conservative, I mean that Im slightly right of centre, rather than a fan of David Cameron. I'll agree with you there about the politicans fighting wars. I always said that if Tony Blair really believed in Iraq/Afghanistan then he would have sent his eldest son into the Army, rather than packing him off to uni to get pissed in the street and give police officers false names/addresses (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/822513.stm). Unfortunately, when people like Harriet Harman wont even walk around their constituency without a stab proof vest, there is no chance of any of them putting on a uniform and taking up a gun. Thanks for your good wishes. Im just starting the process, so it will be at least 12months before I get there, if I do. But hopefully they will need someone of my specific skills (whateever they are!). Ug Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 No worries mate. So do you consider yourself Irish, Scottish or British? I was born in Northern England. However, as far as families go, I haven't got a clue where mine come from originally. My mother is from Northern England as well, but I have only ever met one of my grandparents. Not that it bothers me. I hold a British passport, and have always considered myself as British. Nothing wrong with being a cynic. I'm told I'm pretty cynical myself. When I say Im conservative, I mean that Im slightly right of centre, rather than a fan of David Cameron. I'll agree with you there about the politicans fighting wars. I always said that if Tony Blair really believed in Iraq/Afghanistan then he would have sent his eldest son into the Army, rather than packing him off to uni to get pissed in the street and give police officers false names/addresses (http://news.bbc.co.u...ws/822513.stm). Unfortunately, when people like Harriet Harman wont even walk around their constituency without a stab proof vest, there is no chance of any of them putting on a uniform and taking up a gun. Thanks for your good wishes. Im just starting the process, so it will be at least 12months before I get there, if I do. But hopefully they will need someone of my specific skills (whateever they are!). Ug You will have been a big fan of Margret Thatcher no doubt. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
unlacedgecko 1,467 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Im not really old enough to remember Margret Thatcher to be honest... I do admire the attitude she showed when facing the Falklands invaision and the Iranian Embassy Siege. I think the politicians of today would be far too scared of offending someone to robustly respond to these situations like she did. Hows your ankle healing? Ug Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Where have I said I condone any kind of abuse. The problem with your argument is that as soon as someone disagrees with you accuse them of siding with the other side, which isn't very grown up is it. As for your source of info aft I think it was, one guy's view is hardly conclusive evidence of mass abuse of children...and what did he do...he walked away...none of his business he said now that to me is condoning abuse. The very least he could have made a phone call. The strange thing is I agree with you on the sheira law issue...funny old world ain't it Yeah yeah, I condone abuse when I've come on here to condemn it. You and people like you are probably the lowest form of life in this world. You know this abuse is rife within the Asian communities in this country, so being the upstanding citizen that you are, why aren't you protesting to the government about the child abuse that goes on within their communities? By your thinking you're condoning it by not doing something about it. Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 in case anyone has forgotten Male Genital Mutilation... Jew - Cock - Foreskin - Chop! fxck me guys North of the border you can't get a dog docked but you can have your child's cock chopped Too right. But what the mad mullahs do to little girls is worse. Ric Muslim's also circumcise their young males. Another barbaric practice IMO. Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 (edited) Margaret Thatcher was one one of the few Prime Ministers in modern history to have the guts to make the population take responsibility for there own lives. Following Labours wasted years we are left with thousands of kids with pointless degrees, and now the unaffordable public sector is to be made affordable, they will definately have no 'non jobs' to go to. We have a load of imported foreign Labour voters, which are filling up all our state funded housing and using up many of our public services. Then we have the feckless, Labour voting underclass, that think it is there right to life payed for by the diminished, ever more heavily taxed private sector. I think Cameron will be a lot tougher than anybody realises, when it comes to re-balancing our society and unfortunately, that is the only way we will be able to compete in global markets and be a sucessful country with a future. As for male circumcision, not even in the same league as femail genital mutilation, in many ways male circumcision is beneficial. Edited July 29, 2010 by shepp Link to post Share on other sites
FoxyWarrior 17 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Im not really old enough to remember Margret Thatcher to be honest... I do admire the attitude she showed when facing the Falklands invaision and the Iranian Embassy Siege. I think the politicians of today would be far too scared of offending someone to robustly respond to these situations like she did. Hows your ankle healing? Ug thatcher was two ends of a c**t Thatcher had balls!! Link to post Share on other sites
mackay 3,450 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 The liberal leftie handwringers are still playing the same old record, you can't possibly be a concerned citizen, there's no middle ground as far as they're concerned if your not bending over letting every Tom, Dick and Abdul shaft you then your quite simply a racist. Live and let live they say, well this country is royally buggered just because most decent people have did just that, but it's never enough give an inch, they want a mile and when it all kicks off (and it will) will we be remembered for our tolerance, no, no matter how much we have tolerated it will always fall back to us as a nation being racist in their eyes. Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Im not really old enough to remember Margret Thatcher to be honest... I do admire the attitude she showed when facing the Falklands invaision and the Iranian Embassy Siege. I think the politicians of today would be far too scared of offending someone to robustly respond to these situations like she did. Hows your ankle healing? Ug Ankles healing well thanks to the fantastic work of mr Alli the surgeon who did the operation.I understand veiws on margret thatcher will be baised mostly on wat areas you grew up in i was old enough to see the devastation and poverty she caused in my town in the 80s then again to hear some talk it wasent her fault it was the lazy working class. Link to post Share on other sites
unlacedgecko 1,467 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Glad to hear your getting better and healing well. I dont remember the 80s Im afraid. My first proper memories are of watching the Gulf War on the news in 1991. cheers Ug Link to post Share on other sites
twobob 1,497 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Ye thatcher had balls usually the male cabinet members of her party if they didnt agree with her Link to post Share on other sites
mackay 3,450 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 <BR><BR><BR><BR>Im not really old enough to remember Margret Thatcher to be honest... I do admire the attitude she showed when facing the Falklands invaision and the Iranian Embassy Siege. I think the politicians of today would be far too scared of offending someone to robustly respond to these situations like she did. <BR><BR>Hows your ankle healing?<BR><BR>Ug<BR><BR>thatcher was two ends of a c**t<BR><BR><BR>Thatcher had balls!! <BR><BR><IMG class=bbc_emoticon alt= src="http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/thumbs.gif"><BR> aye she had the balls to bring in the poll tax . she had the balls to sell of the countries assets . she had the balls to strip you of any protection within the workplace and she had a set of balls hanging from her forehead<BR><BR><BR><BR>The three points you mention, poll tax, every economist in the country is in agreement that it was far fairer than council tax, the way it was implemented was the problem.<BR>Selling off the countries assets, do you remember comrade Brown blowing massive amounts of this countries wealth when he sold our gold (the countries, bought with public money) to fund labours bright new future. Or what about his arguably illegal raid on the working mans pension fund.<BR>Stripped of protection in the workplace, under labour we were stripped of protection anywhere or near enough, perhaps not if you were a criminal, murderer or beast, they were all protected by our labour luvvies. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts