Hob&Jill 258 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 Seriously, you have to stop all the bullshit your writing. Nearly all your posts are just blatently made up or exaggerated. You will look back at your posts in a few years and see what a complete bell end your making your self look. Trust me, Ive done it! HOW THE FECK CAN A BIRD WITH A BROKEN WING BE IN A TREE? lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 Hhhhmmm yes.... I smell BS and plenty of it! :stinker: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ratattack 111 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 i bet your mate wouldent be so angry if you took it to the rspca, causing a wild bird a lot of stress and even more suffering, where they tell you there is nothing they can do and they uthanised it. this is what happnd to a black bird with a broken wing in my garden a few months ago. Oh really maybe we should take all the rabbits in our snares and all the other animals to the rspca so they can uuthanise them, rather than us shoot them, f**k yer rspca. see, people opening their mouths, before getting their brain in gear he shot a protected species a blackbird is also a protected species, a rabbit however is classed as a pest a quailified person, can put to sleep and injured animal/bird, that otherwise may not survive in the wild a non quailified person, cannot take on that responsability I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 i bet your mate wouldent be so angry if you took it to the rspca, causing a wild bird a lot of stress and even more suffering, where they tell you there is nothing they can do and they uthanised it. this is what happnd to a black bird with a broken wing in my garden a few months ago. Oh really maybe we should take all the rabbits in our snares and all the other animals to the rspca so they can uuthanise them, rather than us shoot them, f**k yer rspca. see, people opening their mouths, before getting their brain in gear he shot a protected species a blackbird is also a protected species, a rabbit however is classed as a pest a quailified person, can put to sleep and injured animal/bird, that otherwise may not survive in the wild a non quailified person, cannot take on that responsability I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The law permits: The mercy killing of a seriously injured bird if it is unlikely to recover. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RicW 67 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 But does shooting the bird in a tree count as mercy killing? I have twice wrung the necks of injured song birds, once a thrush that had been clipped by a car, once a blackbird that had been ripped up by a cat. Quick clean death both times. But if you go to shoot a bird in a tree and it moves at the last moment you could make its suffering worse. Not to mention the question of what the OP was doing with a gun in the first place. Ric Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stubby 175 Posted March 27, 2010 Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 [ I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The law permits: The mercy killing of a seriously injured bird if it is unlikely to recover. so reading this plonkers first post, he shot a bird in a tree with a broken wing, I'll repeat myself, is he a certified vet that can make a decision just by looking from afar, I doubt it, and I doubt that excuse could be used in a court of law, fine if you find a wounded animal by the roadside after being hit by a car, but "in a tree" shit, every hunter out there would be using that excuse to shoot anything that moves Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 [ I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The law permits: The mercy killing of a seriously injured bird if it is unlikely to recover. so reading this plonkers first post, he shot a bird in a tree with a broken wing, I'll repeat myself, is he a certified vet that can make a decision just by looking from afar, I doubt it, and I doubt that excuse could be used in a court of law, fine if you find a wounded animal by the roadside after being hit by a car, but "in a tree" shit, every hunter out there would be using that excuse to shoot anything that moves I agree with you totally,I was just stating the facts.He said he was at school so I presume he borrowed the gun and pellets from a responsible adult, that person is to blame just as much. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RicW 67 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 [ I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The law permits: The mercy killing of a seriously injured bird if it is unlikely to recover. so reading this plonkers first post, he shot a bird in a tree with a broken wing, I'll repeat myself, is he a certified vet that can make a decision just by looking from afar, I doubt it, and I doubt that excuse could be used in a court of law, fine if you find a wounded animal by the roadside after being hit by a car, but "in a tree" shit, every hunter out there would be using that excuse to shoot anything that moves Please yer Honour, I didn't shoot him because he was an anti, he had fallen over and broken his arm so I put out of pain. Like it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
runforyourlife 361 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 Lets just put this one to bed, and as for the writer of such bullshit, i surgest you go away, have a long hard look at yourself. An even longer word with yourself.. then dont post again, till something is really worth posting about, oh, and it is the truth... Your with men here or women not kids,, Most of us have been there seen it and f.... it! get a grip. Before it gets of grip of you... lieing is like a drug my dear child... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ratattack 111 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 [ I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" I think you will find if an animal or bird, whether protected or not, can be legally dispatched to prevent unneccessary suffering if it is obviously injured and in distress. If i found a bird like a blackbird injured and in distress i would put it out of it's misery rather than stressing it further by "trying to do the right thing" Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The law permits: The mercy killing of a seriously injured bird if it is unlikely to recover. so reading this plonkers first post, he shot a bird in a tree with a broken wing, I'll repeat myself, is he a certified vet that can make a decision just by looking from afar, I doubt it, and I doubt that excuse could be used in a court of law, fine if you find a wounded animal by the roadside after being hit by a car, but "in a tree" shit, every hunter out there would be using that excuse to shoot anything that moves At no point did i condone what he said was done, but merely pointed out that it is legal to despatch an injured bird/animal to prevent futrther suffering. thereby correcting the incorrect information in your post on the matter. A bird in a tree is unlikely to be injured, it may have had a droopy wing wing or be sat on one leg which is common enough and he shot it on that basis. That would be wrong and illegal. This is obviously a child trying to impress people and making himself look like a tit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
colint5 47 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AL BUNDY 45 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 you have to be careful what you do if you go to his house and take your snares back .whats to stop him coming to yours and breaking your sindy dolls. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flamin'Nora! 50 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhitehunter 47 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 do not understand them and do not try to make them understand you..... for they are of another breed Quote Link to post Share on other sites
whin 463 Posted March 28, 2010 Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 get the snares back ,you shouldnt fall out over a tit mate lol,calm down , and get them back or in the long run a cheap way to get rid of him 30 snares , learn to be more thoughtful who you take camping and put the thru hunting ritchels etc before they can stay camping with you, or you could always do what they did in the old god father movie leave a tit at the door lol or a few dead rabbits lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.