Anyone approached by police

[J Darcy 5,871]

Listen, I'm here to protect peoples personal details being posted on the net.If you have a problem with that i suggest you go somewhere else.

No matter who was the injured party i am here to stop it happening if i can.

 

Like it or lump it, that's how it is....

 

Good hunting.......JD

[Guest 2GOOD]

Listen, I'm here to protect peoples personal details being posted on the net.If you have a problem with that i suggest you go somewhere else.

No matter who was the injured party i am here to stop it happening if i can.

 

Like it or lump it, that's how it is....

 

Good hunting.......JD

iv been here before ,like i said he has given what i posted his self on here so its no secret ,and he is not botherd or he would not have done it ,read some of his previous post on other subjects ,ie shooting rabbits on a golf course ,so [what have i done that i should not have ]NOTHING i bet this thread gets deleted now .

Edited March 20, 2010 by 2GOOD

[poacher3161 1,766]

I agree 2Good that artic comes across slightly threatning and his either above the law or is the law

[Guest 2GOOD]

:

I agree 2Good that artic comes across slightly threatning and his either above the law or is the law

,no wonder old spiderpig got it in the neck

[Irish Lurcher 1,013]

Biggest load of bo**ix this thread, should have been pulled long time ago.

[stabba 10,745]

Biggest load of bo**ix this thread, should have been pulled long time ago.

no no no... its proper funny imo

[Guest 2GOOD]

Biggest load of bo**ix this thread, should have been pulled long time ago.

funny that ,your the only one that thiks so ,have a look .

[stabba 10,745]

Right folks... im off for a power nap... keep it clean till i get back

[Guest 2GOOD]

Right folks... im off for a power nap... keep it clean till i get back

dont sleep to long ,it probibly wont be here long ,if some one has any thing to do with it .

[pie 10]

deary me,i forgot what i started reading!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,

[skellyb 8]

Shot guns

6.14 Section 11(5) of the 1968 Act allows

an individual, without holding a shot gun

certificate, to borrow a shot gun from the

occupier of private premises and use it on

those premises in the occupier’s presence.

The presence of the occupier is normally

taken to mean within sight and earshot of the

individual borrowing the firearm. The term

“occupier†is not defined in the Firearms

Acts, nor has a Court clarified its meaning.

However, the Firearms Consultative

Committee in their 5th Annual report

recommended that the provisions of section

27 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981

be adopted. This states that ‘“occupier†in

relation to any land, other than the foreshore,

includes any person having any right of

hunting, shooting, fishing or taking game or

fish’. In the absence of any firm definition

for firearms purposes, it is suggested that

each chief officer of police may wish to make

use of this definition. On some occasions

though, where the status of a certificate

holder acting as an occupier is an issue, the

chief officer may need to consider seeking

the advice of counsel. Section 57(4) provides

that “premises†shall include any land. The

borrower may be of any age but an offence

may be committed under section 22(3) if a

minor under the age of 15 is not supervised

by a person over 21 years of age.

6.15 Similarly, section 11(6) of the 1968 Act

allows an individual, without holding a shot

gun certificate, to use a shot gun at a time

and place approved for shooting at artificial

targets by the chief officer of police for the

area in which that place is situated. As the

approval of such time and place is prescribed

by law and there may be duty of care issues

involved, chief officers may wish not only

to satisfy themselves that such events are

properly conducted and supervised, but also

to establish that there are no public safety

issues involved. When an exemption is

granted, the chief officer should advise

the organiser that they are responsible for

ensuring, so far as is practicable, that

adequate precautions are taken for the safety

of the participants and any spectators. Shoots

at which participants hold certificates do not

require an exemption under section 11(6).

Organisers operating in conjunction with

business, such as corporate entertainment,

will have additional responsibilities under

the Health and Safety at Work Act.

Borrowed rifles on private premises

6.16 Section 16(1) of the 1988 Act enables a

person to borrow a rifle from the occupier

of private premises and to use it on those

premises in the presence of either the

occupier or their servant without holding a

firearm certificate in respect of that rifle. It

should be noted that this gives slightly more

flexibility in the use of a borrowed rifle than

is permissible with the use of a shot gun

as described in paragraph 6.14, in that the

borrowed rifle can also be used in the

presence of the servant of the occupier.

However, the occupier and/or their servant

must hold a firearm certificate in respect of

the firearm being used, and the borrower,

who must be accompanied by the certificate

holder (whether it is the occupier or their

servant), must comply with the conditions

of the certificate. These may include a

safekeeping requirement and, in some cases,

territorial restrictions. Section 57(4) of the

1968 Act defines “premises†as including any

land. The effect of the provision is to allow

a person visiting a private estate to borrow

and use a rifle without a certificate. The

exemption does not extend to persons under

the age of 17 or to other types of firearm.

There is no notification required on the

loan of a firearm under these circumstances.

A borrowed rifle should not be specifically

identified as such on a “keeper’s†or

“landowner’s†firearm certificate. The term

“in the presence of†is not defined in law

but is generally interpreted as being within

sight and earshot.

6.17 Section 16(2) of the 1988 Act provides

for a person borrowing a rifle in accordance

with section 16(1) of the 1988 Act to

purchase or acquire ammunition for use in

the rifle, and to have it in their possession

during the period for which the rifle is

borrowed, without holding a certificate. The

borrower’s possession of the ammunition

must comply with the conditions on the

certificate of the person in whose presence

they are and the amount of ammunition

[genuine 81]

All i can say if you don't like how this place is moderated go and make you're own forum and do whatever you like and post whatever you like ...that way you'll have nothing to moan about ...i mean there's lots of free forum sofware out there ..you can make it as private or as public as you wish ...just remember its not the people or guests viewing this you should be worried about its the people you can't see watching that you should be worried about ...hackers legal and illegal will be into your server before you can say hello and welcome to "Look how big my dick is" feel free to post all your illegal activities on here we don't give a sh1t about the law ...and then lets see how you get on

 

Im a member on two other fourums and had to be vouched for to go on the but ive been out with the people who run them sites top people,only about 100 member max but its pritty safe! Just watch yourselves and what you post and will all be fine man!

[jimmy100 48]

Shot guns

6.14 Section 11(5) of the 1968 Act allows

an individual, without holding a shot gun

certificate, to borrow a shot gun from the

occupier of private premises and use it on

those premises in the occupier’s presence.

The presence of the occupier is normally

taken to mean within sight and earshot of the

individual borrowing the firearm. The term

“occupier†is not defined in the Firearms

Acts, nor has a Court clarified its meaning.

However, the Firearms Consultative

Committee in their 5th Annual report

recommended that the provisions of section

27 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981

be adopted. This states that ‘“occupier†in

relation to any land, other than the foreshore,

includes any person having any right of

hunting, shooting, fishing or taking game or

fish’. In the absence of any firm definition

for firearms purposes, it is suggested that

each chief officer of police may wish to make

use of this definition. On some occasions

though, where the status of a certificate

holder acting as an occupier is an issue, the

chief officer may need to consider seeking

the advice of counsel. Section 57(4) provides

that “premises†shall include any land. The

borrower may be of any age but an offence

may be committed under section 22(3) if a

minor under the age of 15 is not supervised

by a person over 21 years of age.

6.15 Similarly, section 11(6) of the 1968 Act

allows an individual, without holding a shot

gun certificate, to use a shot gun at a time

and place approved for shooting at artificial

targets by the chief officer of police for the

area in which that place is situated. As the

approval of such time and place is prescribed

by law and there may be duty of care issues

involved, chief officers may wish not only

to satisfy themselves that such events are

properly conducted and supervised, but also

to establish that there are no public safety

issues involved. When an exemption is

granted, the chief officer should advise

the organiser that they are responsible for

ensuring, so far as is practicable, that

adequate precautions are taken for the safety

of the participants and any spectators. Shoots

at which participants hold certificates do not

require an exemption under section 11(6).

Organisers operating in conjunction with

business, such as corporate entertainment,

will have additional responsibilities under

the Health and Safety at Work Act.

Borrowed rifles on private premises

6.16 Section 16(1) of the 1988 Act enables a

person to borrow a rifle from the occupier

of private premises and to use it on those

premises in the presence of either the

occupier or their servant without holding a

firearm certificate in respect of that rifle. It

should be noted that this gives slightly more

flexibility in the use of a borrowed rifle than

is permissible with the use of a shot gun

as described in paragraph 6.14, in that the

borrowed rifle can also be used in the

presence of the servant of the occupier.

However, the occupier and/or their servant

must hold a firearm certificate in respect of

the firearm being used, and the borrower,

who must be accompanied by the certificate

holder (whether it is the occupier or their

servant), must comply with the conditions

of the certificate. These may include a

safekeeping requirement and, in some cases,

territorial restrictions. Section 57(4) of the

1968 Act defines “premises†as including any

land. The effect of the provision is to allow

a person visiting a private estate to borrow

and use a rifle without a certificate. The

exemption does not extend to persons under

the age of 17 or to other types of firearm.

There is no notification required on the

loan of a firearm under these circumstances.

A borrowed rifle should not be specifically

identified as such on a “keeper’s†or

“landowner’s†firearm certificate. The term

“in the presence of†is not defined in law

but is generally interpreted as being within

sight and earshot.

6.17 Section 16(2) of the 1988 Act provides

for a person borrowing a rifle in accordance

with section 16(1) of the 1988 Act to

purchase or acquire ammunition for use in

the rifle, and to have it in their possession

during the period for which the rifle is

borrowed, without holding a certificate. The

borrower’s possession of the ammunition

must comply with the conditions on the

certificate of the person in whose presence

they are and the amount of ammunition

i love how this topic started off about trouble from posting on here and ends up with a quote on gun laws on the lurcher section!!!!

[artic 595]

All i can say if you don't like how this place is moderated go and make you're own forum and do whatever you like and post whatever you like ...that way you'll have nothing to moan about ...i mean there's lots of free forum sofware out there ..you can make it as private or as public as you wish ...just remember its not the people or guests viewing this you should be worried about its the people you can't see watching that you should be worried about ...hackers legal and illegal will be into your server before you can say hello and welcome to "Look how big my dick is" feel free to post all your illegal activities on here we don't give a sh1t about the law ...and then lets see how you get on

 

Im a member on two other fourums and had to be vouched for to go on the but ive been out with the people who run them sites top people,only about 100 member max but its pritty safe! Just watch yourselves and what you post and will all be fine man!

 

Oh dear 2GOOD is obviously not that good. I believe your on about Rich The Rabbiter?

(Look at my profile) RTR is a member on here that i have not met, but have offered him a day or two ferreting. RTR replied to a post i placed some time ago offering pest control, he lives fairly local to me, so i offered him a day or two, which we havent organised as yet. I had many replies to my post, and 2 members have been invited and attended many a time, to this date i have not met RTR but we will in time for a day or two.

 

So, not so good anymore, you dont know me, but i know all i need to know about you.

 

So stop calling RTR and asking for info on me. (I can easily sort this out officially if you like?)

 

I have had 6 PM's since your childish posts from members stating that your a prick. Not my words, however i dont think they are wrong!

 

Stop playing the fool, stop making out you know where i live. The BMW garage is a reference to a golfcourse where i have permision to shoot. I wrote a thread on here some time ago (Airgun Section) mentioning the garage and location. So once again 2GOOD, you have failed.

 

I dont want fugative's in my gang.

 

Edited March 20, 2010 by artic

[fresh earth 47]

Bottom line is no one in this current climate should be boasting about piks and at the end of the day whats boaring about looking at dog pictures ? I come on here to look at pictures of dogs personaly and no one should need graphic pictures online to enjoy the forum or sport and if they do they clearly are not part of the working dog world. The streets are over run with drug dealers and they get less bloody heat than we do on here but i doubt very many of them would publicly post pictures that would incriminate them self's . As for the private section what possible good would that bring guaranteed it would be hacked by an anti or police and would be same senario again. Surely nothing of here could stand in court anyway as a 12 year old could photograph road kill and post it on here with there dog with a big spiel its a load of garbage.