braking the rules

[poacher3161 1,766]

Do you not think that in the eyes of the law we as owners of running dogs with the ability to catch wild game have as much resposability as a bull terrier owners to keep there dogs under control to prevent accidents!!!

But that would mean walking about with your lurcher on a slip every were and how meny times has something else flushed [bANNED TEXT] the dogs on its way back with a rabbit.

[shaunpauls7 131]

all the articals i have read on people being caught coursing are dogs being took from them and not aloud to keep any kind of hunting dog there where a few articals on it in the countrymans weekly and also a fine and jail sentence can occur.Just what i have read and been told if any is wrong sorry for false info lol:)

 

 

 

atb shaun

[Guest 2GOOD]

all the articals i have read on people being caught coursing are dogs being took from them and not aloud to keep any kind of hunting dog there where a few articals on it in the countrymans weekly and also a fine and jail sentence can occur.Just what i have read and been told if any is wrong sorry for false info lol:)

 

 

 

atb shaun

they can only take your dog if YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO SAY IT BELONGS TO YOU

[cooper101 86]

I'm not saying these are my views!! It's in reply to getting caught and the punishment that follows!! Were all resposible for our own actions(and our dogs)!! It was really a question do you not think that's the way the eyes of the law sees it when they pass sentance!! Sorry for not explaining it properly!!

[Guest 2GOOD]

I'm not saying these are my views!! It's in reply to getting caught and the punishment that follows!! Were all resposible for our own actions(and our dogs)!! It was really a question do you not think that's the way the eyes of the law sees it when they pass sentance!! Sorry for not explaining it properly!!

no ,they have laws writen down ,that they have to abide by when it comes to court apperances, when a dog is loose its his mind that is controling it as we know ,and there is no law that says we are responsible for what the dog is thinking .

[shaunpauls7 131]

all the articals i have read on people being caught coursing are dogs being took from them and not aloud to keep any kind of hunting dog there where a few articals on it in the countrymans weekly and also a fine and jail sentence can occur.Just what i have read and been told if any is wrong sorry for false info lol:)

 

 

 

atb shaun

they can only take your dog if YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO SAY IT BELONGS TO YOU

 

 

ano that mate ffs

[Catcher 1 639]

In my area i think you would get banged up.They seem to be itching to catch some one.Few guys have had a pull just walking the dogs and been told there cards are marked

[cooper101 86]

I'm not saying these are my views!! It's in reply to getting caught and the punishment that follows!! Were all resposible for our own actions(and our dogs)!! It was really a question do you not think that's the way the eyes of the law sees it when they pass sentance!! Sorry for not explaining it properly!!

no ,they have laws writen down ,that they have to abide by when it comes to court apperances, when a dog is loose its his mind that is controling it as we know ,and there is no law that says we are responsible for what the dog is thinking .

 

so what was the owner of the APBT that killed the little girl in Liverpool jailed for? I thought you could be held resposible for your dogs actions!! If I used a rottwieler off the lead to attack and kill a man would I not be held responsible????

[Guest 2GOOD]

I'm not saying these are my views!! It's in reply to getting caught and the punishment that follows!! Were all resposible for our own actions(and our dogs)!! It was really a question do you not think that's the way the eyes of the law sees it when they pass sentance!! Sorry for not explaining it properly!!

no ,they have laws writen down ,that they have to abide by when it comes to court apperances, when a dog is loose its his mind that is controling it as we know ,and there is no law that says we are responsible for what the dog is thinking .

 

so what was the owner of the APBT that killed the little girl in Liverpool jailed for? I thought you could be held resposible for your dogs actions!! If I used a rottwieler off the lead to attack and kill a man would I not be held responsible????

yes you would have set it on him by the way you wrote that ,and the person that was done for APBT well with out seeing what he was charged with i cant answer the question .could have been having a dangerous dog loos in a public place who knows Edited March 16, 2010 by 2GOOD

[Catcher 1 639]

The Act makes it an offence for a person to hunt a wild mammal with a dog unless the hunting is exempt. For the purposes of the Act, the word ‘hunting’ has its ordinary English meaning, which includes searching for wild mammals, chasing them, or pursuing them for the purpose of catching or killing them. The Act makes clear that a person is hunting a wild mammal with a dog if he engages alone or participates with others in the pursuit of a wild mammal and a dog is employed in that pursuit, whether or not under his direct control. As hunting requires the intention to search for, chase or pursue the quarry, it is not possible to hunt by accident.

[Guest 2GOOD]

The Act makes it an offence for a person to hunt a wild mammal with a dog unless the hunting is exempt. For the purposes of the Act, the word ‘hunting’ has its ordinary English meaning, which includes searching for wild mammals, chasing them, or pursuing them for the purpose of catching or killing them. The Act makes clear that a person is hunting a wild mammal with a dog if he engages alone or participates with others in the pursuit of a wild mammal and a dog is employed in that pursuit, whether or not under his direct control. As hunting requires the intention to search for, chase or pursue the quarry, it is not possible to hunt by accident.

then why are hunts men being found not guilty in court .

[romany52 313]

The Act makes it an offence for a person to hunt a wild mammal with a dog unless the hunting is exempt. For the purposes of the Act, the word ‘hunting’ has its ordinary English meaning, which includes searching for wild mammals, chasing them, or pursuing them for the purpose of catching or killing them. The Act makes clear that a person is hunting a wild mammal with a dog if he engages alone or participates with others in the pursuit of a wild mammal and a dog is employed in that pursuit, whether or not under his direct control. As hunting requires the intention to search for, chase or pursue the quarry, it is not possible to hunt by accident.

 

To me that means, if something gets up in front of exersising dogs, accidentally, then it's not hunting,so you are not contravening the act.Thats obviously why so many hunts get off. Intention is not easy to prove.

[Catcher 1 639]

The Act makes it an offence for a person to hunt a wild mammal with a dog unless the hunting is exempt. For the purposes of the Act, the word 'hunting' has its ordinary English meaning, which includes searching for wild mammals, chasing them, or pursuing them for the purpose of catching or killing them. The Act makes clear that a person is hunting a wild mammal with a dog if he engages alone or participates with others in the pursuit of a wild mammal and a dog is employed in that pursuit, whether or not under his direct control. As hunting requires the intention to search for, chase or pursue the quarry, it is not possible to hunt by accident.

then why are hunts men being found not guilty in court .

 

The topic did state taking hare,deer.of fox with a lurcher.As for the hunts men dont know.If they get of with it fine love it.In this case your wrong pain and simple.All dogs must be under the owners control at all times.Lasts words on this.atb.Catcher

[riohog 5,701]

The Act makes it an offence for a person to hunt a wild mammal with a dog unless the hunting is exempt. For the purposes of the Act, the word ‘hunting’ has its ordinary English meaning, which includes searching for wild mammals, chasing them, or pursuing them for the purpose of catching or killing them. The Act makes clear that a person is hunting a wild mammal with a dog if he engages alone or participates with others in the pursuit of a wild mammal and a dog is employed in that pursuit, whether or not under his direct control. As hunting requires the intention to search for, chase or pursue the quarry, it is not possible to hunt by accident.

then why are hunts men being found not guilty in court .

 

becouse there is alot of ££££ backing them

[fieldsman 51]

What if you are on permission hunting rats rabbits'flushing cover crops for eg brussels cabbage ect'and a hare,fox or deer break cover and this happens 100 times a year .If the dogs were loose and killed whatever broke would I be breaking the law.