DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Open letter to Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary Hampshire Constabulary Police Headquarters West Hill Romsey Road Winchester Hampshire SO22 5DB Dear Alex Marshal Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary Reference: The crimes of Guy Shorrock. 1] Why will the police not investigate the crimes of Guy Shorrock given your pledge to the public or does it just apply when it suit you? 2] Why are the police not prosecuting Shorrock for criminal damage and Burglary? The court judgement is clear: if Shorrock is liable for the damage to the door and he should not have been on Chris Marshall’s premises then it follows that Shorrock is a burglar as he has committed criminal damage and it is the duty of the police to prosecute Shorrock now the judge has spoken. 3] Why did the police make You Tube remove the video footage that proved Shorrock had lied to Hampshire in his confidential report, that he had criminally damaged the lock on the door therefore Shorrock was a burglary? The police’s duty is not to try and protect Shorrock from being exposed as a liar even if this also exposes the mistakes of the police. 4] Why are Hampshire Police claiming to need more funds yet they are paying for a judgement against Shorrock when the judge has decided that Shorrock is liable and not the police? 5] What hold has Shorrock got over the police to the extent that he controls them even to the extent that the police pay for a judgement against him? 6] Why are the police allowing Shorrock to live out his hidden agenda’against member of the public and why are the police no longer using Shorrock on police raid? Quote Link to post
black bird 1 Posted March 13, 2010 Report Share Posted March 13, 2010 this man can not be trusted and the police seam to stand bi him and why dose he need to have access to photos of small children given the fact he has not had a crb check and when it dose not have anything to do with any of the case s as in the john DODSWORTH case he took away a photo of his son standing in front of the television with just his underpants on and the police seam to think this is ok and in the DAVID STREET case he has took away photos of his son and made a video in his child's bed room and the police will not comment on this and just stand bi this man [bANNED TEXT] kind of hidden agenda are we talking about here Quote Link to post
poacher3161 1,766 Posted March 13, 2010 Report Share Posted March 13, 2010 Very worrying it seems as though the police are protecting this man or is it to protect some senior officers as theirs been a couple of cases of this nature recently. Quote Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2010 this man can not be trusted and the police seam to stand bi him and why dose he need to have access to photos of small children given the fact he has not had a crb check and when it dose not have anything to do with any of the case s as in the john DODSWORTH case he took away a photo of his son standing in front of the television with just his underpants on and the police seam to think this is ok and in the DAVID STREET case he has took away photos of his son and made a video in his child's bed room and the police will not comment on this and just stand bi this man [bANNED TEXT] kind of hidden agenda are we talking about here You are right to mention the semi naked children's photographs. What Shorrock wants with those pictures is beyond me especially without a CRB check. Even I need a CRB check in case I have to drive some children to school however Shorrock is above all of this and he even gets to police to pay his judgements. What is going on with this lying individual and the police? Quote Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2010 Very worrying it seems as though the police are protecting this man or is it to protect some senior officers as theirs been a couple of cases of this nature recently. There is a nest of snakes and the police are protecting Shorrock. Quote Link to post
Jebus 3 Posted March 14, 2010 Report Share Posted March 14, 2010 Mr Canning I congratulate your effort of teaching the world what Guy Shorrock is really like. There doesn't seem to be something ticking right here. I wonder why the Police are protecting Shorrock. He's a wierd prat who spouts a crock of shite. Quote Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2010 Mr Canning I congratulate your effort of teaching the world what Guy Shorrock is really like. There doesn't seem to be something ticking right here. I wonder why the Police are protecting Shorrock. He's a wierd prat who spouts a crock of shite. Guy Shorrock is a very intelligent man and if wanted to could embarrass the police to put it lightly. There is a lot of evidence that I have been told not to publish on Shorrock as it would cause trouble for the people whom supplied the evidence. Quote Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc Quote Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 ' date='15 March 2010 - 12:47 AM' timestamp='1268614045' post='1483366']http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc'>http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc The police are refusing to answer. Police cover up. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc Quote Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 ' date='15 March 2010 - 08:12 PM' timestamp='1268680358' post='1484047']' date='15 March 2010 - 12:47 AM' timestamp='1268614045' post='1483366']http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc'>http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc The police are refusing to answer. Police cover up. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hampshire_police_and_guy_shorroc Derek Canning LLB [HONS] 28 March 2010 Dear Hampshire Constabulary, What has occurred to my official complaint? Please note the enclosed court transcript that proves that Shorrock admits his fault yet the police paid the judgement that has not been given against them. BEDFORD COUNTY COURT BEFORE: DISTRICT JUDGE WHITE Case No: 9BK01887 Shire Hall 3 St Paul's Square Bedford MK40 1SQ 8th February 2010 MARSHALL EARTHMOVING Claimant - v - SHORROCK Defendant Hearing Compril Limited Telephone: 01642 232324 Facsimile: 01642 244001 Denmark House 169-173 Stockton Street Middlehaven Middlesbrough TS2 1BY No. of folios in transcript: No. of words in transcript: 5,794 HEARING 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. District Judge White: Right. The case has been settled, I can see that, because there's a cheque been offered for the full amount of the claim, plus costs. Miss Cooper: Indeed Sir. There seems to be an issue, I've spoken very briefly ... District Judge White: Yes. Miss Cooper: ... with Mr Marshall this afternoon and he doesn't seem to have received the cheque. I don't know if he's seen a copy of the letter, but that seems to be why we're here today. District Judge White: (Inaudible). Mr Marshall: (Inaudible) no money at all. The last letter I had was from Hampshire Constabulary on 14th December stating that they were going to send their solicitor here, basically highjack the case and force me to accept money from the police. District Judge White: Well, I don't think that's the case actually because I think the letter is from (Inaudible) Masons who represent Mr Shorrock I presume. Miss Cooper: Indeed Sir, that's the letter of 28th January. Perhaps I could hand a copy to Mr Marshall. District Judge White: Yes, yes, absolutely. Mr Marshall: I haven't received ... because I only came back from France late last night and I've not received anything. Mr Shorrock ... District Judge White: Well we'd better have a look at that then. Mr Marshall: And I've just been informed that I signed for this letter ... that I've signed for two letters ... District Judge White: Yes. Mr Marshall: ... by the Post Office. Well I haven't because I haven't been in the country and I'm ... this card is the Post Office card. I'm the only person who can possibly sign for any letters. District Judge White: You have a box number, don't you? Mr Marshall: Yes. District Judge White: How does that work? Mr Marshall: I... 19. District Judge White: You have to go open it and collect it from the Post Office? 20. Mr Marshall: No, no. I have to go in there and show them my card and then they go to the box and pick up any post for me. And I did tell Mr Shorrock that... or the RSPB that I couldn't accept any post after 16th January and the RSPB had over a month to actually settle up and they asked for this case to be ... I didn't want this to go ahead, but they asked for this case to go ahead. And that's the last communication I had, was on 16th January. 21. District Judge White: Well let me ... 22. Mr Marshall: Well, the last communication I had was 14th December. 23. Miss Cooper: There was also a letter of 7th January. 24. District Judge White: Yes. 25. Mr Marshall: And I did notify, I'm sorry, but I did notify Mr Shorrock on 4th of January at the very latest I had to make all my travel arrangements and work reschedules. 26. District Judge White: Do you live abroad? 27. Mr Marshall: Sorry? 28. District Judge White: You live abroad did you say? 29. Mr Marshall: No, I'm working in France. 30. District Judge White: You're working in France? 31. Mr Marshall: Yes. It's cost me nearly £7,000 to come here today. 32. District Judge White: £7,000? 33. Mr Marshall: I've lost five days work ... 34. District Judge White: Oh I see. 35. Mr Marshall: ... and travelling from Bordeaux and back. I've got four days travelling. 36. District Judge White: Well I can't find the letter now and it's not a paginated bundle. 37. Miss Cooper: Sir, I've just handed my copy to you. 38. District Judge White: (Inaudible). 39. Mr Marshall: Well I haven't had this, I'm sorry, and nobody has signed for any post in that Post Office box, so whoever said that someone has signed it is lying. They can't possibly have signed it. 40. District Judge White: So what's the date of that letter? 41. Miss Cooper: The first one's ... it's 28th January, Sir. 42. District Judge White: I don't think I've got that. I've got 7th January. 43. Miss Cooper: Ah. 44. District Judge White: I thought... 45. Miss Cooper: There's one 28th January, which is what the recorded delivery note that I have is for. Those instructing me sent me that this morning. And there's also a letter of the 7th. That was just sent first class post. 46. District Judge White: No, I don't think I've got 28th January. 47. Miss Cooper: Ah. 48. Mr Marshall: 28th January. (Inaudible) signed for? 49. Miss Cooper: (Inaudible). In any event, Sir, I think maybe we're being circuitous in that the offer of settlement has been made. The matter is ... 50. District Judge White: Yes. 51. Miss Cooper: ... whether it's (inaudible). 52. District Judge White: That's what it is, I've seen reference to the letter, because I can tell you that, Mr Marshall, that (Inaudible) wrote to the court on ... well two days ago actually, in which they said ... they sent a cheque for the full amount of the claim on 7th January. I'll just check that letter ... 53. Mr Marshall: (Inaudible). 54. District Judge White: Please find (inaudible). 55. Mr Marshall: And the lady says I've signed for it, but I haven't because I haven't got it. There was nothing in my post box up until 16th January. 56. District Judge White: Well there's a copy of the cheque attached anyway. 57. Mr Marshall: Yes. I'm not (inaudible). 58. District Judge White: So you're saying you haven't had the letter of 7th January? 59. Mr Marshall: I haven't had any letters from ... the last communication I had was from Roger Trencher on 14th December. 60. District Judge White: It's PO Box 1823? 61. Mr Marshall: 1823. And I'm the only person with this card who can sign for letters in that box. 62. District Judge White: And then it says "SP11 7ZN", is that your ... 63. Mr Marshall: SP11 7ZN, that's the postcode of the box from the Post Office. 64. District Judge White: Right. Anyway, they wrote to the court, as I said, a couple of days ago saying ... confirming that they'd paid it. We have written on 28th January providing payment in the full amount of 355. Oh I see, so there's a cheque, you're saying, been sent for £310 on 7th January? 65. Miss Cooper: Sir, yes. And then the second letter incorporates the extra £40 I believe it was that Mr Marshall (inaudible). 66. District Judge White: Yes, which I haven't seen. 67. Mr Marshall: And these have all been signed for, have they, these letters? 68. District Judge White: Well let's have a look at the signatures then. 69. Miss Cooper: Sir, this is the ... what's provided by the Royal Mail ... 70. District Judge White: I don't know that they provide, sometimes it's the postman that signs for these, isn't it? 71. Mr Marshall: No. They can't possibly. Not allowed to. You can't possibly sign for letters that go to a Post Office box. 72. Mr Marshall: Well perhaps that's to show that it's gone to the Post Office, Sir. 73. District Judge White: Yes. I think my experience of the Royal Mail is although you can ask for it to be signed for, they don't always do that. I can't see a signature on this. 74. Miss Cooper: Well, I believe that's what was sent back to those who send the letter so that... 75. District Judge White: It may well be. It's probably just their confirmation that they posted it or something. 76. Miss Cooper: Sir, yes. District Judge White: Have you had a look at that, have you, Mr Marshall? Mr Marshall: Well... District Judge White: That's just... that's what they got from the Post Office. Mr Marshall: To say that it's been signed for? 81, District Judge White: Well I don't know. If you read it, it just says ... 82. Mr Marshall: Recorded signed for posting receipt. I mean one of the conditions is that they ... District Judge White: Thank you. Mr Marshall: ... can not possibly sign for business mail that goes through a Post Office box. 85. District Judge White: Anyway, you haven't signed for it then (inaudible). 86. Miss Cooper: Sir, the offer is open for acceptance if Mr Marshall wishes to accept it. 87. District Judge White: The amount is 355.37? 88. Miss Cooper: Indeed Sir. 89. District Judge White: Yes, right, is that accepted? It seems to be (inaudible). 90. Mr Marshall: I would like some contribution towards my travel costs for coming here today. Mr Shorrock had over a month when he paid ... I had to send the bailiffs to the RSPB Headquarters, because he had such contempt he wouldn't pay the ... District Judge White: Yes. Mr Marshall: ... travelling expenses last time. District Judge White: I think the court fee is included in that, isn't it, the £100 (inaudible)? 94. Miss Cooper: It is. 95. Mr Marshall: But I shouldn't have to do that sort of thing when the judge has order Mr Shorrock to pay my travelling expenses, he just didn't bother. 96. District Judge White: On the last occasion you mean? 97. Mr Marshall: Yes. 98. District Judge White: How much was that? 99. Miss Cooper: It was £. 100. District Judge White: And that's included in it? 101. Miss Cooper: Indeed. 102. District Judge White: Right, what do you say about the claim for the expenses for him being here today? 103. Miss Cooper: Sir, well the difficulty is, the first letter was sent on 7th January and there was a reply from Mr Marshall's company on 11th January saying that then he was away. It seems, in any event, if those letters had been delivered, perhaps if Mr Marshall knew that he was away he could have provided an alternative address by which means this matter could have been settled. And, in addition, offers were being made as far back as December and cheques were sent to settle this matter by the police ... 104. District Judge White: Yes. (Inaudible). 105. Mr Marshall: Made out to the wrong person and for the wrong amount. And it wasn't the police, who I'm taking action against. 106. Miss Cooper: Sir, the transcript does demonstrate that Judge (Inaudible) had requested that somebody pay, there is no specific direction that it be the claimant, sorry, the defendant in this matter. 107. District Judge White: Yes. 108. Mr Marshall: The cheques were made out to the wrong person and for the wrong amount. 109. Miss Cooper: Sir, there was a letter sent to a different... to the right person and it was sent ... the letter was sent three times ... three letters were sent, I do apologise. So, it's fair to say that the defendant, in my submission, has made every possible attempt to settle this matter and prevent today going forward. If an alternative address had been provided then perhaps that could have been done. So, I would strongly contest any application for costs today on the basis that the ... Mr Marshall: I... I... District Judge White: Wait a minute. (Inaudible) finish. Mr Marshall: Sorry. Miss Cooper: ... on the basis that the defendant has acted reasonably in all the circumstances and has tried several times to settle this matter. 114. District Judge White: Okay. (Inaudible) Mr Marshall. 115. Mr Marshall: May I say the cheque was sent to the wrong person and for the wrong amount. District Judge White: (Inaudible). This is ... this is the earlier cheque, isn't it? Mr Marshall: All three cheques were for the wrong amount. District Judge White: Apart from the one that ... 355, which is the right amount? 119. Miss Cooper: Sir, yes. Sir, I believe when the police cheque was sent the amount wasn't an issue and subsequently the extra amount, for example, for the key had been added, so thus the amount has been changing as we've been going ... 120. District Judge White: No, I understand that. 121. Mr Marshall: Why did it go from £74 ... just when I asked him to pay me £74 to what do you say it is now? Why did you let it get to that stage? All Mr Shorrock had to do was send me £74. And then he had the judgment set aside because he wanted prove his innocence and come here today. I had to book ... we had to change all our work schedules, I've got proof of ferry bookings made on 4th January before you've said that you've written to me. 122. District Judge White: So, tell me the dates you've been away then? 123. Mr Marshall: I actually left ... I had to make all my bookings, I've got confirmation here, booking date, 41 January, and I told Mr Shorrock this, I've had to book two ferry crossings, a return one. 124. District Judge White: So have you been away for three weeks or two weeks or? 125. Mr Marshall: I left on 16th January. And there's the ferry port confirmation. 126. District Judge White: So, 16th January you went to France, yes? 127. Mr Marshall: Yes. And I came back yesterday. 128. District Judge White: I see. And then ... are you going back to work tomorrow? 129. Mr Marshall: Yes, I am, yes. Saturday night the booking is, but I'm going to try and change it to tomorrow. 130. District Judge White: Yes. 131. Mr Marshall: Because I've got to get accommodation in this country otherwise. 132. District Judge White: I see. Obviously... 133. Mr Marshall: I've got photographs of the job, if you're interested. 134. District Judge White: No, no, no. (Inaudible). 135. Mr Marshall: I mean it's (inaudible). 136. District Judge White: Right. So the hearing ... sorry, the letter that was on January, I'm satisfied it was sent but you're saying you didn't get it. 7th / 137. Mr Marshall: Yes, I can understand that. Well, I can prove I didn't get it. Well, I can prove it wasn't signed for by me, and nobody else is allowed to sign for anything without that card. 138. District Judge White: No, I understand what you're saying. Then there's another letter, you weren't there then of course, but in theory you should be able to pick it up on the 16th assuming it was there. 139. Mr Marshall: Nothing in the box on the morning of the 16th, absolutely nothing. 140. District Judge White: On the 28th there's another letter sent, and you are here, but this time you didn't get that either. 141. Mr Marshall: I'm not... on 28th January? 142. District Judge White: That's right. 143. Mr Marshall: No, I didn't come back until last night. On 28th January I've receipts for buying stock in France. 144. District Judge White: I've put here you were away working on 16th January, you returned yesterday. 145. Mr Marshall: Yes, that's right, quite right. 146. District Judge White: So really it only boils down to one letter, doesn't it, which is the 7th? 147. Miss Cooper: Indeed Sir, but in any event, in my submission, if the letter of the 7th was sent, there as plenty of time beforehand, the police letters are at (inaudible). 148. Mr Marshall: (Inaudible) couldn't have possibly legally have paid the cheque in, because the cheque was made out to me personally. 149. Miss Cooper: If I could refer you, Sir, to the second letter of the police, it's behind tab 2, which is the letter dated 9th December. 150. District Judge White: Yes. I did read through some of these. 151. Miss Cooper: (Inaudible) please now find enclosed a cheque payable to Marshall Earthmoving. Is that... 152. Mr Marshall: For the wrong amount. There was no VAT listed on it. 153. District Judge White: It doesn't actually say how much it's for, does it? 154. Miss Cooper: No. It doesn't Sir but... 155. Mr Marshall: It was totally the wrong amount. I cannot... this is my business. I can not... 156. District Judge White: Well the letter back says £198. (Inaudible) 10th December. They sent it again on 14th December for £198. And then it moves on to 7th January doesn't it? Which ... 157. Mr Marshall: In the meantime I can prove and I did notify Mr Shorrock on probably 14th December that I would have to be away, if he didn't settle up within the next 14 days I would have to make my bookings and reschedule the work arrangements, which I did on 4 January. 158. Miss Cooper: Sir, the difficulty is that there is a letter from ... on the 11th saying (inaudible). 159. Mr Marshall: So the difference to me is £7,000, near enough, and a hell of a journey. 160. Miss Cooper: 11th January, after the letter of the 7th. 161. Mr Marshall: And the audacity of it all is that Mr Shorrock still denies he did any damage to my property, and I've sent the court a video and I've got a copy here. 162. District Judge White: I haven't got that. 163. Miss Cooper: Sorry? 164. District Judge White: I haven't got the letter of 11th January. 165. Miss Cooper: Bear with me one second. 166. District Judge White: A very random bundle this. I've got letters back from Marshall's ... it's a lady, isn't it? 167. Mr Marshall: Yes. Mrs Rosebury, my secretary 168. District Judge White: I've got the letters here for the Hampshire Police, but I haven't got any ... you're probably (inaudible) are you? 169. Miss Cooper: Yes Sir. 170. District Judge White: I haven't got that. 171. Miss Cooper: Just one moment. I'm having difficulty at the moment. 172. Mr Marshall: The situation is absolutely ridiculous over £74. 173. District Judge White: Well, it's a lot more than that, isn't it, now for various reasons. 174. Mr Marshall: Well, Mr Shorrock would not pay me and he would not admit that he was trespassing and damaged my lock. He tried to force his way into my office. He could have phoned me. He's got my mobile number. 175. District Judge White: Ah. I've found it. It's nowhere near it should be. Is this the one ... oh no, that's the RSPB. I thought I'd' found it. Unfortunately not. Thank you. Right. (Inaudible) same one. 176. Mr Marshall: He's extremely lucky so far I haven't pursued him for trespassing, the police and Judge (Inaudible) has now admitted that he was trespassing. 177. District Judge White: Mr Marshall is now not in a position to receive communications until his return f travelling directly to the court case. communications until his return from abroad on 3rd February when he will be 178. Miss Cooper: Indeed Sir, that was sent on the 11th. That first letter was sent on the 7th. In my submission ... 179. District Judge White: Doesn't refer to the 7th (inaudible)? 180. Miss Cooper: No, it doesn't, Sir, but my submission is ... that letter was clearly sent, whether it was received obviously is being denied, but the point is that if the ... if Mr Marshall was going away, in the interests of resolving the matter, an alternative address could have been provided or perhaps alternative arrangements for picking up any post, and given the significant attempts to settle that had been made in the past, it wouldn't be reasonable on all the circumstances to award to costs (inaudible). 181. Mr Marshall: I wasn't expecting any more post, because Mr Trencher said he was going to come here and highjack the court case, basically. I certainly wasn't expecting Mr Shorrock to go and do something like (inaudible) fighting over £74. 182. District Judge White: (Inaudible) the most bizarre situation I've ever come across. Who's paying for this? 183. ?: Agree. 184. District Judge White: (Inaudible). So, looking at the history of it, there was ... 185. Mr Marshall: Well, why was it left from 14th December ... why was it left until 11th January before he contacts me and attempted to pay me? 186. District Judge White: Let's have a little look, yes, it all could have finished before Christmas, couldn't it? 187. Mr Marshall: It could easily ... what... fourteen ... nearly three weeks to do it. 188. District Judge White: Hampshire saying ... Police saying here's the cheque, we can pay on your ... on his behalf, that's no problem. And then the next step is you send a letter, which Mr Marshall's saying he didn't receive, he doesn't mention it in his letter dated 11th January, which supports the contention that he possibly didn't actually receive it, and then he says I'm not here until 4th February or 3rd February, not in a position to receive communications. 189. Mr Marshall: I mean I've had to pay for this hearing even in advance. 190. District Judge White: Well, has the hearing fee been included in the (inaudible). 191. Miss Cooper: As far as I'm aware, Sir, yes. 192. District Judge White: How much did you pay for the hearing? 193. Mr Marshall: Well, I sent two cheques actually because the first one (inaudible) just before I went away wasn't ... it was £25, that was what I should have paid, but I did send a cheque and I assumed you'd got one of them. I just (inaudible). 194. District Judge White: No, it hasn't been included anyway. 195. Mr Marshall: Sorry? 196. District Judge White: It hasn't been included. You haven't included that so. The hearing fee was £25 you think, probably was, yes. 197. Mr Marshall: Yes, but I sent two cheques, but I assume that you'll send one back. 198. District Judge White: You'll get one back. Well, if you're accurate they have to. So (inaudible) twenty-five anyway. So that's ... 199. Miss Cooper: Very well Sir. 200. Mr Marshall: I did tell Mr Shorrock that if he didn't pay before ... in that twenty days, he's got it in a letter somewhere, that I would pursue him for loss of earnings and travelling, if this court case goes ahead. 201. Miss Cooper: (Inaudible). 202. District Judge White: 380.37. 203. Miss Cooper: Thank you. 204. District Judge White: What are ... what is the amount you're claiming for the travel and loss or earnings? I mean loss of earnings is a bit of red herring to be honest. 205. Mr Marshall: I can't claim loss of earnings because it's small claims. 206. District Judge White: Yes. 207. Mr Marshall: You know? 208. District Judge White: (Inaudible) pounds maximum anyway, and that's not being able to work on the day. Right. 209. Mr Marshall: Return trip, I done 700 ... oh no ... a total round trip to Bedford, I've done 1,114 mile. 210. District Judge White: How did you get here then? 211. Mr Marshall: Sony? 212. District Judge White: You drove all the way from where? 213. Mr Marshall: I drove from Bor ... I've got all the ... 214. District Judge White: And the cost of that is how much? 215. Mr Marshall: Well you pay ... they pay by the mile, but I've got all of the toll charges, I've got a receipt for everything, which can be ... District Judge White: How much is it? Tell me how much it is. Mr Marshall: Right. I don't know because it's how much ever you pay. I spent 63.40 Euros, 63.40. 218. District Judge White: No, no. How much is the mileage? How much is your claim, that's what I'm asking you? 219. Mr Marshall: Well, you paid me 40p last time. 220. District Judge White: Let's assume it's40p, how much is it then? 221. Mr Marshall: Right. £445.60p. I've got two ferry crossings at £154. 222. District Judge White: Two ferry crossings, you mean a return trip? 223. Mr Marshall: A return, yes, I'm going back tomorrow night if I can, Saturday night, which I've already paid for, I've got receipts for. I've got toll charges of 63.40 cents, in Euros, which is equal roughly a pound to a Euro. I've got receipts for one hotel in France which I had to stay overnight, 92 Euros. 224. District Judge White: Why did you stay in a hotel? 225. Mr Marshall: Because I couldn't make it from Bordeaux to the ferry without an overnight crossing. 226. District Judge White: Yes. 227. Mr Marshall: And I've got two nights in bed and breakfast in Dunstable, last night and tonight, and that's evening meal, bed and breakfast. And that's £160. And that's without what I've lost... 228. District Judge White: Right, tell me about your French work, how long have you been working in France since? 229. Mr Marshall: Probably two year ... nearly three years now. I don't always work in France. 230. District Judge White: No. When you do, how long do you work there for? 231. Mr Marshall: Three, four months at a time. 232. District Judge White: Right. So why couldn't you arrange the court hearing so that you were in England rather than have to come back from France? 233. Mr Marshall: Because the court hearing was arranged for me. Mr Shorrock ... 234. District Judge White: Yes, but why didn't you say, I'm in France, can I arrange it for another day? 235. Mr Marshall: I did. I did to the judge and he said, well I can't tell you when it will be. I said, well... 236. District Judge White: I know, but having got the date, why didn't you write to the court and say, I'm in France, can I have another date? 237. Mr Marshall: We had. Mrs Rosebury did. 238. District Judge White: To whom, to the court? I don't see that. 239. Mr Marshall: Well, she said I'm unavailable (inaudible). I mean I can not keep coming back here. I've got to do some work. 240. Miss Cooper: I haven't seen a letter. 241. District Judge White: To whom? To the court or to (inaudible)? 242. Mr Marshall: I'm sorry, Sir, but I didn't quite understand. I can't... 243. District Judge White: I'm trying to understand why you didn't ask for the court date to suit your work arrangements abroad? 244. Mr Marshall: Well, I don't know when I'll finish the job. We're diverting a river. I've got photographs of the job. I don't know when ... 245. District Judge White: Well how long is it? Years or months? 246. Mr Marshall: Well months. 247. District Judge White: Right, so you could easily say I'll be available in July or August? Mr Marshall: I don't know. District Judge White: Well sometime this year. Mr Marshall: I could have said, yes, let's put it off. District Judge White: Yes. Mr Marshall: But I just ... you know, I didn't really think I could it off, to be quite honest, I thought it was ridiculous that it was going through ... going ahead when Mr Shorrock had from 14th December to 4 January to settle up, and that was ample time. 253. District Judge White: Right, any comment? 254. Miss Cooper: Sir, yes. In relation to the letter of 14th December, no comment was received back in relation to that letter, so obviously it would take a while to decide exactly how to proceed and what was going on in any event, and how to proceed thereafter. Also there must be a duty to mitigate any form of loss, particularly with a small claim in terms of travel expenses. And in my submission there must have been some way of this being listed in a more convenient fashion and for Mr Marshall to take action to have done that. In terms of the costs, Sir, itself, in my submission, permitting that, those three hotels all in all plus the two ferry crossings are unreasonable in the circumstances, given those factors and given the claimant's various attempts to settle in the background, that any duty to mitigate has not been taken and thus if any travel expenses were to be awarded they should be kept to the bare minimum, as they were last time. 255. Mr Marshall: I wasn't paid enough last time actually because they got the mileage wrong. The judge said ... I wasn't expecting mileage, the mileage from Hampshire up to here was seventeen miles further each way, I know it's not much, Further to our complaint in relation to the police abusing tax payer’s money I would add the following: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ha... Note the judge on appeal again states that Shorrock is liable so why are the police using tax payer's money to pay a judgement against Shorrock? The public have a right to know why their money is being miss-used, anything else is a cover up to negate exposing the activities of the police and Shorrock. Public servants are and must be accountable to the public. See the page from the appeal judgement in question. I will be publishing the full transcript to expose they abuses of public money and the fact there needs to be a criminal investigation into the activities of Guy Shorrock in-totality, anything else is a cover up therefore I would invite the Minister of Justice to set up a criminal inquiry into the many complaints against Guy Shorrock throughout the UK. I note the elevated words of justice spoken by the Minister of Justice now it is time to live up to the words. To date the Minister of Justice has ignored all of my letters expressing our concerns. However, I have not received a single reply in spite of detailed evidence that prove serious criminal activities that have resulted in serious consequences. but I just wanted to wrap the thing up. I didn't come here lightly for fun because it's costs me an ultimate fortune, if we've had a lot of rain in France it will cost me a hell of a lot more, it could put months on the job. 256. District Judge White: What I'm going to do is this, I think there is some doubt as to whether you received the letter, but I do struggle with why you didn't make yourself available by telephone or otherwise, simply to say (inaudible). 257. Mr Marshall: Well I did, I did. Well I made a point that Mr Shorrock ... I said I cannot wait any longer before I make my business arrangements. I mean these machines, I'll show you, I mean you can't... this is the job. That's the river. You can't ... they're some of the biggest earth moving machines in Europe, you just cannot park them up, it's not a JCB or a mini-digger. 258. District Judge White: What I'm going to do is this, as I said, I don't think I am satisfied that you did get that letter in relation to the offer, and the offer has changed and it has become more generous, that's quite obvious, and because you weren't here I can see there's been a difficulty. But the amount seems to me to be disproportionate. Normally you would get reasonable travel expenses. It seems to me there could have been some savings made. So I'm going award a global sum of £335, so it will say judgment for (inaudible) against the defendant (inaudible) claimant... a new total wasn't it, wasn't it, 380.37, yes? 259. Miss Cooper: Indeed Sir. 260. District Judge White: 380.37, including fees, plus 335. Yes? 335? 261. Miss Cooper: Is that the previous amount Sir. 262. District Judge White: Travel expenses. 263. Miss Cooper: Yes. I think that's what you've just said. 264. District Judge White: It's got to be proportionate to the amount (inaudible) and it's a relatively small amount of money, I think it started off at about £75 or £. 265. Mr Marshall: Well, perhaps you'd like to ask Mr Shorrock why he didn't pay it. 266. District Judge White: Alright, so that's whatever that is in total, I'll work it out while we're all here. 380.37 plus 335 is 715.37. Shall I say fourteen days? 267. Miss Cooper: Sir, yes. And perhaps you could ... 268. Mr Marshall: That's what you said last time. I had to send bailiffs in to the RSPB Headquarters to get it. 269. District Judge White: Sorry, did you say something. 270. Miss Cooper: Sir, yes, perhaps if we could have clarification as to exactly where it should be sent. 271. District Judge White: Yes. 272. Miss Cooper: And who it should be payable for, just so (inaudible). 273. Mr Marshall: To that box number, to the box number. Could I please ask that you add VAT to that? The RSPB can get it back. 274. District Judge White: Sorry? VAT, no. I'm not adding VAT. It's not a vatable item. 275. Mr Marshall: It's vatable to me because it's income. I've got to pay a proportion of that as VAT, because it's claimed through the business. 276. Miss Cooper: Sir, VAT has been added, that's part of the settlement figure because Mr Marshall requested it last time ... 277. District Judge White: No, I understand that 278. Miss Cooper: ... but in my mind there's no reason to add it on to the judgment figure. I have never experienced that in any form of judgment before. 279. District Judge White: No, I haven't either, so no I'm not. In terms of the address, yes, it's going to be? 280. Mr Marshall: PO Box 1823. 281. District Judge White: Yes. 282. Mr Marshall: Andover, Hants. And any cheques to be to Marshall Earthmoving, not to Mr Marshall or C R Marshall. 283. Miss Cooper: Marshall Earthmoving. 284. Mr Marshall: Yes. 285. District Judge White: Well that's the claimant anyway, isn't it? 286. Mr Marshall: Sorry? 287. District Judge White: That is the name of the claimant. 288. Mr Marshall: Yes, yes. 289. District Judge White: (Inaudible) correct. 290. Miss Cooper: And the postcode, SP11 7ZN, is that right? 291. Mr Marshall: 7ZN,yes. 292. District Judge White: And hopefully everybody can draw a line under it now. 293. Miss Cooper: Thank you Sir. 294. Mr Marshall: Thank you very much. 295. District Judge White: Thank you. 296. Miss Cooper: Sir, do you wish me to take the bundle back? 297. District Judge White: Oh if you wouldn't mind. 298. Mr Marshall: Sir, would it be possible I could have the video back? 299. District Judge White: Is that your video, is it? 300. Mr Marshall: Yes. 301. District Judge White: Well, we couldn't play it. Is this yours? 302. Mr Marshall: Yes. 303. District Judge White: I'll check it is yours. I'm sure it is yours. You haven't got a video, have you, Miss Cooper? 304. Miss Cooper: No Sir. 305. Mr Marshall: I did send one to the RSPB (inaudible). 306. District Judge White: (Inaudible) their own video. I mean (inaudible) something different. 307. Mr Marshall: Okay. Thank you. End of Transcription We hereby certify that this is a verbatim transcript of the hearing heard on 4th February 2010. Compril Limited. Yours faithfully, Derek Canning LLB [HONS] Quote Link to post
![DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS]](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201024%201024%22%20style%3D%22background%3A%23c46362%22%3E%3Cg%3E%3Ctext%20text-anchor%3D%22middle%22%20dy%3D%22.35em%22%20x%3D%22512%22%20y%3D%22512%22%20fill%3D%22%23ffffff%22%20font-size%3D%22700%22%20font-family%3D%22-apple-system%2C%20BlinkMacSystemFont%2C%20Roboto%2C%20Helvetica%2C%20Arial%2C%20sans-serif%22%3ED%3C%2Ftext%3E%3C%2Fg%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.