Guest JOEB Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 There is a very intresting article in Private Eye this week about the Badger Culling debate. To cut a long story short, they are saying that all the well meaning folk who send there hard earned money to the RSPCA in the mistaken belife that they are a few cearing folk who look after sick animals are being misled. The RSPCA is now actually a semi-political body and general puppet of the animal rights brigade. When the issue of a badger cull was raised to stop the spread of bovine TB, a full scale propaganda war swung into action which totally ignored the scientific facts. It was in fact little better than blatant lies.... They spent donators money of a very expensive media campaign and got the backing of various renta-celebs. This unduly influenced DEFRAs decision on the matter by using this campaign of lies to get people to lobby the goverment.........who duly bottled it (despite hard scientific evidence) and ordered a "study" :whistle: In ireland, a study showed that culling reduced the rates of bovine TB by 96%.....FACT What I want to know is, why isnt the CA or BASC mounting similar hi profile media campaigns to show these people for what they are.............lying twats who just want to jam there own agenda down our throats. I am afraid that to me the CA & BASC are nothing but LAME DUCKS.......to put it mildly. You watch, some top people at CA & BASC will be getting chummy with ministers and it will be feck you lads, pull the ladder up. JOEB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ditch_Shitter Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 I'd be interested to see any convincing arguements against a word ye said there, Joe! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JOEB Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Because the countryside alliance to a man are scum , why would they do anything ? its f**k all to do with mounted hunting . I was talking to a "lurcherman" on the CA stand at the Midland..........double standards?? They seem to have all the bases covered when taking your money??......... Why does it take a mag like Private Eye to write and article like this?? JOEB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Because they're the only ones with the bollocks to upset the balance. It's much easier to do and say f**k all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nelson 0 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 From what i understand of the CA & BASC for which i am a member of both,they have to move in these " political circles" to fight the Anti's as this is where they have they're puppets ( Labour MP's in the main). The aim of these clubs,call them what you will,is to protect fieldsports against a twisted enemy who will not be easily defeated. The RSPCA are involved in a massive media campaign against perciefed animal cruelty,that means against anyone who hunts,shoots,coarses,fishes and farts.They are not going to go away and have to be taken on at every level. Have them waste they're money on legal expenses etc,vote out politicians who are anti field sports,its not that easy.Because some of these MP's wear a red rossette,some folk seem to think they are champions of the community and vote for them.Most of them are career politicians who are only out for themselves. Vote the b'stards out at local and General elections,visit they're surgeries and let them know what you think of them,look into the tw*ts eyes and take note of how he looks down his nose at you,thinks YOU are scum,smiles and then shows you the door.Safe in the knowledge the electorate are so brain washed he'll be there for a good few years yet. Like Chris says,its easier to do and say nowt...............so who has visited they're local friendly anti hunt MP then ? I hope more publications like Private Eye get involved in something like this,its the only way the greater public can ever get hold of genuine,unbiased information.A sad reflection of a great nation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bullsmilk 2 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 seems there all to scared to say any thing and ruffle any feathers....if we keep quiet theyle forget were here... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nelson 0 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 If the conservatives were in power the ban would probably never have happened,whether we will ever see hunting again as before ? i don't know. Will we ever see Badger control in this country with terriers ? i very much doubt it. If we do f*ck all about these idiots in power at the moment we wont be able to walk a dog down the road,let alone let it off a lead.of that i am fairly sure,and when i say dog i mean working dog,not poodle. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chillitt 0 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 i reckon a few years ago it would have been madness to contradict anything the rspca said, because they were THE authourity on animal welfare. the tide is turning, though.. they have changed dramatically from the 'good old days' far more political and completly biased. but its still a brave move to go against them, in the eyes of the general public, anyway. but let them continue to dig themselves a hole. while they are sidelining themselves, the CA dont really need to join in (though it would be nice..) in much the same way as the tories are growing in popularity not through doing anything, but just by letting labour hang themselves, the time will come for the rspca to reap what they are sowing. sooner the better Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MOLLY Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 I do not believe for one minute the torys will bring back hunting. They have said they will 'look into it', to me thats their way of keeping us sweet. we wont be able to walk a dog down the road,let alone let it off a lead.of that i am fairly sure,and when i say dog i mean working dog,not poodle. Im sure that is already in force (if not, there was talk of it) not just working dogs, any dog, if you have 3 (may be less i cant remember) or more dogs under your control you are not allowed even one of them off the lead in a public place. MOLL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AKA-BRINDLE 879 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 David cameron did say on the radio the other day he would definatly change the law on hunting if he gets in but i wouldnt belive a word that dribbles outta his mouth lets be honest the blokes a Pratt i shouldnt hold your breath waiting for the torys to ride to your rescue lets not forgett that fantastic little law passed by the Torys back in 91 the DDA! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nelson 0 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Molly the prick (MP) Ian Cawsey,who supposedly does my beckoning in the house of commons, has told me, he intends that every dog is collared and leashed.As he puts it,folk out walking don't want someone elses dog jumping up at them. Big brother is coming to a constituency near you ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MOLLY Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 You know whats lovely about this thread....? Peoples anger being directed in the right direction for a change, to those against us, instead of one of us MOLL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pockets 0 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 I do not believe for one minute the torys will bring back hunting. They have said they will 'look into it', to me thats their way of keeping us sweet. we wont be able to walk a dog down the road,let alone let it off a lead.of that i am fairly sure,and when i say dog i mean working dog,not poodle. Im sure that is already in force (if not, there was talk of it) not just working dogs, any dog, if you have 3 (may be less i cant remember) or more dogs under your control you are not allowed even one of them off the lead in a public place. MOLL. Molly is a woman and therefore she is to be listened to her views are bang on they will not look into it as it is law....fact! Much as i disagree woman have a very pragmatic view of life which is hard to fault! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JOEB Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 The ex-Lib Dem MP whos is very anti hunt and was voted out of her seat because of it (cant think of her name) is now the top johnny at the RSPCA......... Hunting Folk put HALF A MILLION people on the street once, with the help of the CA........why not once a year? The alliance has gone very, very quiet.............gin & tonics all round chaps? JOEB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MOLLY Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Molly is a woman and therefore she is to be listened to her views are bang on they will not look into it as it is law....fact!Much as i disagree woman have a very pragmatic view of life which is hard to fault! I like you MOLL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.