wexford Pa 84 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 I havent found any (undershot) to lose teeth any quicker than any other dog but i can see how it can happen but not that ive known or seen.. Hepher ur spot on lad, work over looks anyday, i prefer to keep a type of preferance ie. size n weight etc.. but second to work ability.. Line-breedin is the reason why workin blood kept goin.. .... Pa Quote Link to post
Hepher 86 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 OMD ANY DOG WILL LOOSE TEETH WHEN UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL, DEPENDS ON THE DOGS WORKING STYLE NOT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. MAYBE YOU PREFER A LOOKER THAN A WORKER? Quote Link to post
DannyMc 143 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 (edited) I. Edited June 9, 2010 by DannyMc Quote Link to post
oohmydog 82 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 OMD ANY DOG WILL LOOSE TEETH WHEN UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL, DEPENDS ON THE DOGS WORKING STYLE NOT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. MAYBE YOU PREFER A LOOKER THAN A WORKER? i have had 3 dogs that were undershot one was f*****g crackers the other 2 lost a big percentage of teeth by there second season ,we could go on and on ,as it gone of topic i cant remember (the cracks about lookers and opinions being crap are a bit Cornie )a dog with out teeth is just a bark Quote Link to post
clinker 0 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 that breedin close is a load a bollox,its not natural it might work for a while but its gona fuk up dogs in the long run,its not natural and i dont give a fuk what any of ye say. Quote Link to post
manspade 3 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 clinker can i ask how long you have benn breeding dogs. How long have you been working dogs? Because yous attitude unless your just on a wind up seems a little stupid no offence Quote Link to post
wexford Pa 84 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 that breedin close is a load a bollox,its not natural it might work for a while but its gona fuk up dogs in the long run,its not natural and i dont give a fuk what any of ye say. shows what u know.. Wolves in the wild dont travel far from there place of birth n stay within a family pack that control a territory and they breed regularly, so are u tellin me that they dont breed to relatives, be it half brother to half sister, uncle to niece?.. They dont know how there related but there pack thrives.. animals of all kind breed within a family and dont regularly go outside there territory to breed.. So tell me again how unnatural is it? Quote Link to post
manspade 3 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 that breedin close is a load a bollox,its not natural it might work for a while but its gona fuk up dogs in the long run,its not natural and i dont give a fuk what any of ye say. shows what u know.. Wolves in the wild dont travel far from there place of birth n stay within a family pack that control a territory and they breed regularly, so are u tellin me that they dont breed to relatives, be it half brother to half sister, uncle to niece?.. They dont know how there related but there pack thrives.. animals of all kind breed within a family and dont regularly go outside there territory to breed.. So tell me again how unnatural is it? PA YOU ARE THE MAN Quote Link to post
sounder79 80 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 (edited) that breedin close is a load a bollox,its not natural it might work for a while but its gona fuk up dogs in the long run,its not natural and i dont give a fuk what any of ye say. shows what u know.. Wolves in the wild dont travel far from there place of birth n stay within a family pack that control a territory and they breed regularly, so are u tellin me that they dont breed to relatives, be it half brother to half sister, uncle to niece?.. They dont know how there related but there pack thrives.. animals of all kind breed within a family and dont regularly go outside there territory to breed.. So tell me again how unnatural is it? [/quote Edited February 24, 2010 by sounder79 Quote Link to post
bordertime 0 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 if you never worried what a terrier looked like in time there would not be any terriers!!! Quote Link to post
FightTheBan 1,147 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 "if you never worried what a terrier looked like in time there would not be any terriers!!!" Whit? Cannae get ma head round that one. If terriers werent bred for looks, only hunting ability, there would not be as much SH1TE, is what you should have said. Quote Link to post
Guest digthemdeeper Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 that breedin close is a load a bollox,its not natural it might work for a while but its gona fuk up dogs in the long run,its not natural and i dont give a fuk what any of ye say. shows what u know.. Wolves in the wild dont travel far from there place of birth n stay within a family pack that control a territory and they breed regularly, so are u tellin me that they dont breed to relatives, be it half brother to half sister, uncle to niece?.. They dont know how there related but there pack thrives.. animals of all kind breed within a family and dont regularly go outside there territory to breed.. So tell me again how unnatural is it? well said pa dont agree with much of what u say but agree on that line breeding is important to keep the line working..... :thumbs: Quote Link to post
wexford Pa 84 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 if you never worried what a terrier looked like in time there would not be any terriers!!! What a feckin statement n half! C'mon explain urself with that.. Well done on ur 1st post by the way, cracker! Welcome to THL.. .... Pa Quote Link to post
Guest digthemdeeper Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 if you never worried what a terrier looked like in time there would not be any terriers!!! What a feckin statement n half! C'mon explain urself with that.. Well done on ur 1st post by the way, cracker! Welcome to THL.. .... Pa reatard on the loose..... Quote Link to post
clinker 0 Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 that breedin close is a load a bollox,its not natural it might work for a while but its gona fuk up dogs in the long run,its not natural and i dont give a fuk what any of ye say. shows what u know.. Wolves in the wild dont travel far from there place of birth n stay within a family pack that control a territory and they breed regularly, so are u tellin me that they dont breed to relatives, be it half brother to half sister, uncle to niece?.. They dont know how there related but there pack thrives.. animals of all kind breed within a family and dont regularly go outside there territory to breed.. So tell me again how unnatural is it? PA YOU ARE THE MAN wolves are wild,terriers are domesticated,pa you are the man alrite thats why you dont see much wolves goin around wit shite jaws and not much terriers bring down bleedin reindeer. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.