00taz11 39 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 My link Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnGalway 1,043 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 First hunting, next step bank robberies Think the cops would have something better to be doing with their time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chainman 8 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 the sad thing is the lads were actually goin to eat them so they werent goin to waste they were out hunting for the pot sad state of affairs when you cant even go hunting to fill your freezer talk about a free country its getting more like old russia everyday were already queing in the supper markets for bread in this weather lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tjones3862 3,423 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 the country as gone f**king mad tj Quote Link to post Share on other sites
runforyourlife 361 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 We all know its illegal... Come on even if it isnt that bad to us, some guy throwing dead animals out the back of a vechile is pretty distasteful anyway. You couldnt really exspect the filth to turn a blind eye on that..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chainman 8 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) We all know its illegal... Come on even if it isnt that bad to us, some guy throwing dead animals out the back of a vechile is pretty distasteful anyway. You couldnt really exspect the filth to turn a blind eye on that..... if it wasnt illegal fella they wouldnt of thrown them would they ????? Edited January 9, 2010 by Chainman Quote Link to post Share on other sites
runforyourlife 361 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 We all know its illegal... Come on even if it isnt that bad to us, some guy throwing dead animals out the back of a vechile is pretty distasteful anyway. You couldnt really exspect the filth to turn a blind eye on that..... if it wasnt illegal fella they wouldnt of thrown them would they ????? i know that pal, i was replying to the guy above who asked if the police didnt have anything better to do....Plus, the scret is, not to get caught. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 Its the confiscation and a ban on keeping dogs thats so wrong That the prosecutor is suggesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SCOTTY1 3 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) WHY WERE THEY LAMPING THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE WHY NOT RUN THEM PROPERLY DURING THE DAY IF THEY WERE GOING TO BREAK THE LAW WHY DO IT AT NIGHT, GIVE THE HARE A BIT OF RESPECT Edited January 9, 2010 by SCOTTY1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
arcticgun 4,548 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 awful thing to have to say, but they should have never had the hares in the motor, with the way things stand these days, atvb Richard Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SCOTTY1 3 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 WELL RICHARD YOUR RIGHT IN A LOT OF WAYS, WHY DID THEY NOT LEAVE THEM SOMEWHERE AND GO BACK FOR THEM WITHOUT THEIR DOGS THEY CANT VALUE THEM VERY MUCH TO RISK THEM IN THAT WAY OR THE HARES TO RUN THEM IN THE LAMP Quote Link to post Share on other sites
runforyourlife 361 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 WELL RICHARD YOUR RIGHT IN A LOT OF WAYS, WHY DID THEY NOT LEAVE THEM SOMEWHERE AND GO BACK FOR THEM WITHOUT THEIR DOGS THEY CANT VALUE THEM VERY MUCH TO RISK THEM IN THAT WAY OR THE HARES TO RUN THEM IN THE LAMP Spot on Scotty, day time activity all the way... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chainman 8 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 WELL RICHARD YOUR RIGHT IN A LOT OF WAYS, WHY DID THEY NOT LEAVE THEM SOMEWHERE AND GO BACK FOR THEM WITHOUT THEIR DOGS THEY CANT VALUE THEM VERY MUCH TO RISK THEM IN THAT WAY OR THE HARES TO RUN THEM IN THE LAMP we can all say stuff like this now cant we at the end of the day its just a damn shame you cant fill your freezer with your own dogs without having the risk of losing your best and trusted parts of the family that do there job for you thats the sad thing fellas them lads are know lookin at losing there dogs and gettin a ban from keepin them if there readin this then keep your chins up lads and best lof luck with the case yours in sport chainy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chainman 8 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 WELL RICHARD YOUR RIGHT IN A LOT OF WAYS, WHY DID THEY NOT LEAVE THEM SOMEWHERE AND GO BACK FOR THEM WITHOUT THEIR DOGS THEY CANT VALUE THEM VERY MUCH TO RISK THEM IN THAT WAY OR THE HARES TO RUN THEM IN THE LAMP Spot on Scotty, day time activity all the way... and you risk losing a lot more doin it that way fella anyway its just a shame the way this countrys goin stay safe out there fellas as big brother is deffo watchin you Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nakednutt 58 Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 Its the confiscation and a ban on keeping dogs thats so wrong That the prosecutor is suggesting. forgive me if i'm wrong but i believe scottish courts can't enforce a ban on keeping dogs out with scotland. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.