bubbaG 0 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 is anyone else thinking that there isn't the same fox's about since the fuzz made it easier to get a rife (northern ireland) just heard about a guy who is on his 400th fox this season, i don't no about you but if that is what one man is taking out of area what are other taking out of the same area's that men want to work there dogs. How can a species keep up with that amount of hammering. 400 fox's is 8 terriermen seasons this makes me feel sick Link to post
Dosser 52 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 is anyone else thinking that there isn't the same fox's about since the fuzz made it easier to get a rife (northern ireland) just heard about a guy who is on his 400th fox this season, i don't no about you but if that is what one man is taking out of area what are other taking out of the same area's that men want to work there dogs. How can a species keep up with that amount of hammering. 400 fox's is 8 terriermen seasons this makes me feel sick You're spot on mate, but we're not allowed to talk about it on here. Link to post
FightTheBan 1,147 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Mate, i dont see the problem. I shoot foxes, i dig and i run lurchers. What the feks the point in knocking anyones sport. If peoples jobs depend on them killing foxes to rear game or livestock then whats the issue. My brother works on a grouse moor, and there out lamping 4 times a week, too right, there fekin vermin at the end of the day, thats what you lot sometimes forget, and its your main argument for being able to kill them. Foxes will always be around, no ones going to wipe them out, and if hes killing 400 a year, the place muct be jumping with them or someones talking sh1te. Hate to see posts like this that do nothing but divide us up. Link to post
bubbaG 0 Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 is anyone else thinking that there isn't the same fox's about since the fuzz made it easier to get a rife (northern ireland) just heard about a guy who is on his 400th fox this season, i don't no about you but if that is what one man is taking out of area what are other taking out of the same area's that men want to work there dogs. How can a species keep up with that amount of hammering. 400 fox's is 8 terriermen seasons this makes me feel sick You're spot on mate, but we're not allowed to talk about it on here. i no mate there must be more shooting men than REAL doggie men on this site Link to post
sounder 9 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Mate, i dont see the problem. I shoot foxes, i dig and i run lurchers. What the feks the point in knocking anyones sport. If peoples jobs depend on them killing foxes to rear game or livestock then whats the issue. My brother works on a grouse moor, and there out lamping 4 times a week, too right, there fekin vermin at the end of the day, thats what you lot sometimes forget, and its your main argument for being able to kill them. Foxes will always be around, no ones going to wipe them out, and if hes killing 400 a year, the place muct be jumping with them or someones talking sh1te. Hate to see posts like this that do nothing but divide us up. i have to agree i do all types of hunting, and 400 foxes !!! it could be done but i like to hear it from the horses mouth , sounder p.s i know i be back to lock this me thinks lol Link to post
marky r 25 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 400 foxes hes talking crap unless he got shitload of permission or its lifting with them id say i dont believe much off what people tell me when its to do with hunting or shooting take it with a pinch of salt. Link to post
FightTheBan 1,147 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I also think 400 foxes is far from true. You said yourself it was just hearsay, and i would say its been multiplied a few times. Link to post
bubbaG 0 Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I also think 400 foxes is far from true. You said yourself it was just hearsay, and i would say its been multiplied a few times. yeah most shooting men are full of sh1t arn't they Link to post
FightTheBan 1,147 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 ''yeah most shooting men are full of sh1t arn't they '' You see the problem with comments like that is youve obviosly got some idea in your head that you can tar us all witht the same brush because you have had a bad experience. 90% of the people i know that shoot, do some kind of other fieldsports , i.e lurchers, terriers, ferreting etc. Only ever met 1 bad one, real twat, shouldnt have a gun, but the difference is i didnt let that warp my perspective of rifle boys in general, and i dont go on a public forum spouting harmfull lies and statements about them. Maybe there wouldnt be a huntiing ban if everyone who takes part in any rural persuit be it hunting, shooting, dogs, fishing got off their arese and supported each other. But i suppose you will always get the odd individual who likes to play devils advocate. Link to post
Guest AngelicAcid Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 Actually You use a gun either way, lamping or digging. Link to post
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 I also think 400 foxes is far from true. You said yourself it was just hearsay, and i would say its been multiplied a few times. yeah most shooting men are full of sh1t arn't they 400!!!!! you must be as thick as 5hit to believe it Link to post
genuine 81 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 400 has got to be bullshit thats 1+ a day or 7-8 in a week hes talking shit! Link to post
mikeyboy 7 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 i have to say round where we are rifle men do seem to be a numbers thats all they care about. they like to totaly wipe a area out and then they are proud of it. it really pisses me off to hear it Link to post
fensaluki 35 Posted December 14, 2009 Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 ''yeah most shooting men are full of sh1t arn't they '' You see the problem with comments like that is youve obviosly got some idea in your head that you can tar us all witht the same brush because you have had a bad experience. 90% of the people i know that shoot, do some kind of other fieldsports , i.e lurchers, terriers, ferreting etc. Only ever met 1 bad one, real twat, shouldnt have a gun, but the difference is i didnt let that warp my perspective of rifle boys in general, and i dont go on a public forum spouting harmfull lies and statements about them. Maybe there wouldnt be a huntiing ban if everyone who takes part in any rural persuit be it hunting, shooting, dogs, fishing got off their arese and supported each other. But i suppose you will always get the odd individual who likes to play devils advocate. Well said "FightTheBan" I would suggest that we remember when the ban was brought in how many thousands of shooting men were in london on the marches to support us and this is how we say thankyou I guess we will be under the spotlight again before them ? couldn't realy blame em if they stayed at home next time hey? Shame. i do wonder if some people get a bit jelious when other poeople have more permision and more charlie to go at. ATB Link to post
bubbaG 0 Posted December 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2009 i have to say round where we are rifle men do seem to be a numbers thats all they care about. they like to totaly wipe a area out and then they are proud of it. it really pisses me off to hear it good man for standing up Link to post
Recommended Posts