Cleanspade 3,322 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) i see the plummer topic is locked was there a reason for this? or was it locked becouse it was about plummers. seems odd when most topics on this site are discussed over and over again. and there is a power of shite wrote on most breeds yet these pages are allowed to run and run. i know its a novel idea but why not use sensible moderation and use the warning system or ban troublemakers. love them or loath them plummers are here to stay and are an integral part of the hunting scene. as a hunting forum i would have expected the mods to give a fair and balanced aproach to all sportmen and there wards whatever there chosen breed. or are we going to have to bow down to those that shout the loudest as per usual. you know the ones that contribute very little. aparet from the odd one liner plummers have a lot to offer. as a versitile little working companion probably better lock this in case it offends real terriermen and let all the dodgy barely legal posts roll on f****n mods are a joke on here. let the threads run and moderate them by warning or removing offenders otherwise whats the point in that system disgruntled plummer owner. Edited January 2, 2010 by Cleanspade Quote Link to post
fireman 10,859 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 . Plummer owner who has heard it all before and really don't give a sh*t Quote Link to post
woodard 32 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 There is good and bad in all Bred's Quote Link to post
qwe 0 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 There is good and bad in all Bred's The dogs are fine,its the owners where ther's good and bad Quote Link to post
dpb82uk 138 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 There is good and bad in all Bred's The dogs are fine,its the owners where ther's good and bad you right ther mate Quote Link to post
woodard 32 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 There is good and bad in all Bred's The dogs are fine,its the owners where ther's good and bad you right ther mate your both joking right ? Quote Link to post
qwe 0 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 There is good and bad in all Bred's The dogs are fine,its the owners where ther's good and bad you right ther mate your both joking right ? No. Quote Link to post
Big bald beautiful 1,231 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Here is my words of wisdom , on the subject Lads and lasses that have had the breed before and worked them have in 90% of cases moved on to other breeds for different reasons, and the new owners seem to be in it to breed and show the dogs. The fancy web sites, fancy breed clubs and shows do nothing to advance the working of the breed, yes they get the dog noticed and talked about but is it needed? the breed should be noticed because it works hard the pat and lakey hasnt a fancy breed club and doesnt get the negative comments that the plummer is bound to attract. Quote Link to post
steviemann 5 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Stand by for another locked thread. Quote Link to post
steviemann 5 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) Stand by for another locked thread!!! OPPS Edited December 12, 2009 by steviemann Quote Link to post
SCOTTY1 3 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Here is my words of wisdom , on the subject Lads and lasses that have had the breed before and worked them have in 90% of cases moved on to other breeds for different reasons, and the new owners seem to be in it to breed and show the dogs. The fancy web sites, fancy breed clubs and shows do nothing to advance the working of the breed, yes they get the dog noticed and talked about but is it needed? the breed should be noticed because it works hard the pat and lakey hasnt a fancy breed club and doesnt get the negative comments that the plummer is bound to attract. WELL SAID I HEARD THE SILLY WOMEN ARE TRYING TO GET KC REG FOR THEM AS IF THAT MAKES THEM A BETTER DOG Quote Link to post
fireman 10,859 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) Think the KC bit is more to do with the wishes of a dead man than anything else but i'll put my head on the line and say at least if they did get the KC bit at least a few of the dogs would get a tracable pedigree instead of the clubs refusing to recognise each others dogs so refusing paperwork due to out of date bitching between them all.A lot will scoff at the thought of pedigree's but most of folks on here would like a tracable historyof their dogs be they terriers or whatever type. Edited December 12, 2009 by fireman Quote Link to post
stormyboy 1,352 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) Well said Fireman. Also,folks just cant accept that Plummers are superior working dogs. If that dont lock it nothing will!!! Edited December 12, 2009 by stormyboy Quote Link to post
Guest 1 man and hiz dog Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Well said Fireman. Also,folks just cant accept that Plummers are superior working dogs. If that dont lock it nothing will!!! if the dog does go to k.c then you may as well piss in the wind the breed is bollocks because people breed shite to shite and just saw pound signs,and if it does go to k.c feck me there will be nothing down for the dog.dont get me wrong i dont like the breed but i think this would not be the way forward Quote Link to post
stormyboy 1,352 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Nothing wrong with a piss in the wind-as long as the wind is behind you. Its when you piss INTO the wind-that sucks cos you get covered and smell of wee. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.