Swampy 147 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 For every action thare is a reaction. Cut down the rainforests and there will be a reaction Burn fossil fuels and there will be a reaction Those are the two fundamentals changes that have been ongoing and exponentially increasing over past few decades. Can't honestlyt believe that people can't expect there to be some payback from these. Sure there are smaller issues muddying the waters as both sides of the argument clamber for an outcome. Sure because there is the opportunity there will be those who want to profiteer. A little knowledge is about the most dangerous thing people have. That makes the climatologists the most dangerous folk on earth! Scaryning Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bolio 51 Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leeview 791 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Its alarmism pure and simple....remember acid rain? chernoble? Yes our power stations outfallwas blamed for destroying hectare upon hectare of forests in northern Europe but when Chernoble went up the outfall landed on our west coast from Scotland to Wales So was Chernoble causing damage to the atmosphere before it went up?and not mentioned? Y.I.S Leeview Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bolio 51 Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/09/hockey-stick-observed-in-noaa-ice-core-data/#more-13939 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/09/hockey-stick-observed-in-noaa-ice-core-data/#more-13939 Thats a nice article mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bolio 51 Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen/SolarWind.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOPPER 1,809 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 warning dont live in ellsemere port area or runcorn at kemira growhow they pump 900 tons of co2 into the atmsphere every day 150 -200 tons of ammonia gas and over the water at runcorn they chuck out 400 ton of clorine gas its know wonder it stinks around there you only have to look at strongstuff to see the effects its having!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Its alarmism pure and simple....remember acid rain? chernoble? Yes our power stations outfallwas blamed for destroying hectare upon hectare of forests in northern Europe but when Chernoble went up the outfall landed on our west coast from Scotland to Wales So was Chernoble causing damage to the atmosphere before it went up?and not mentioned? Y.I.S Leeview Different types of power station. Coal fired power stations cause Acid Rain. Chernobyl was nuclear. No damage to the atmosphere, but the radioactive fallout caused extra cancers in the North West. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Its alarmism pure and simple....remember acid rain? chernoble? Yes our power stations outfallwas blamed for destroying hectare upon hectare of forests in northern Europe but when Chernoble went up the outfall landed on our west coast from Scotland to Wales So was Chernoble causing damage to the atmosphere before it went up?and not mentioned? Y.I.S Leeview Different types of power station. Coal fired power stations cause Acid Rain. Chernobyl was nuclear. No damage to the atmosphere, but the radioactive fallout caused extra cancers in the North West. There weren't that many deaths around chernobyl appart from those involved in the accident/clean up operation. 2000 thyroid cancers most of which were treated. There was anticipated by scientists and the media a huge number of cancer deaths which just didn't materialise. So with that in mind how would it have caused any cancers in the NW of the UK. Did you know we had our own little nuclear accident in the NW? Windscale, change the name and hey presto! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RicW 67 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Its alarmism pure and simple....remember acid rain? chernoble? Yes our power stations outfallwas blamed for destroying hectare upon hectare of forests in northern Europe but when Chernoble went up the outfall landed on our west coast from Scotland to Wales So was Chernoble causing damage to the atmosphere before it went up?and not mentioned? Y.I.S Leeview Different types of power station. Coal fired power stations cause Acid Rain. Chernobyl was nuclear. No damage to the atmosphere, but the radioactive fallout caused extra cancers in the North West. Did it? The epidemiological evidence is that the effects of radioactive fallout from Chernobyl were and are negligible. Yes the guys who went in there to try to control the melt-down are dying from massive overdoses of radiation but the effects even a few miles away were non-existent. And just what in the names of all the gods does this have to do with global warming? Somebody on this thread recently came up with that old mis-quote about "a little knowledge . . ." Damn right. Unless you have at least a basic understanding of the science involved just keep your stupid mouth shut. Me? Aggressive in my views? Never, and if you disagree I'll see you outside. Ric :realmad: :aggressive: :crazy: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Keswick 119 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 It dont matter anyway, cause on the 21st december 2012 the world is going to end The Mayans predicted it! And they came from atlantis... So there! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) Did it? The epidemiological evidence is that the effects of radioactive fallout from Chernobyl were and are negligible. Yes the guys who went in there to try to control the melt-down are dying from massive overdoses of radiation but the effects even a few miles away were non-existent. And just what in the names of all the gods does this have to do with global warming? Somebody on this thread recently came up with that old mis-quote about "a little knowledge . . ." Damn right. Unless you have at least a basic understanding of the science involved just keep your stupid mouth shut. Me? Aggressive in my views? Never, and if you disagree I'll see you outside. Ric :realmad: :aggressive: :crazy: Epidemiology is the study of how contagious diseases develop, not environmental diseases. And I wasn't the one bringing up Chernobyl. You're right, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. But no knowledge is worse. Keep taking the medication Ric Edited December 10, 2009 by droid Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RicW 67 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Did it? The epidemiological evidence is that the effects of radioactive fallout from Chernobyl were and are negligible. Yes the guys who went in there to try to control the melt-down are dying from massive overdoses of radiation but the effects even a few miles away were non-existent. And just what in the names of all the gods does this have to do with global warming? Somebody on this thread recently came up with that old mis-quote about "a little knowledge . . ." Damn right. Unless you have at least a basic understanding of the science involved just keep your stupid mouth shut. Me? Aggressive in my views? Never, and if you disagree I'll see you outside. Ric :realmad: :aggressive: :crazy: Epidemiology is the study of how contagious diseases develop, not environmental diseases. And I wasn't the one bringing up Chernobyl. You're right, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. But no knowledge is worse. Keep taking the medication Ric Ha! Concise Oxford Dictionary, 2002 edition has:- epidemiologyn, the branch of medicine concerned with the incidence and distribution of diseases and other factors relating to health. -It, as a science, is not concerned with causative agents, merely with distribution. The correct quotation is:- "A little learning is a dang'rous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain And drinking largely sobers us again" Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism Ric, going to the bar for another glass of medication,W Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RicW 67 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Did it? The epidemiological evidence is that the effects of radioactive fallout from Chernobyl were and are negligible. Yes the guys who went in there to try to control the melt-down are dying from massive overdoses of radiation but the effects even a few miles away were non-existent. And just what in the names of all the gods does this have to do with global warming? Somebody on this thread recently came up with that old mis-quote about "a little knowledge . . ." Damn right. Unless you have at least a basic understanding of the science involved just keep your stupid mouth shut. Me? Aggressive in my views? Never, and if you disagree I'll see you outside. Ric :realmad: :aggressive: :crazy: Epidemiology is the study of how contagious diseases develop, not environmental diseases. And I wasn't the one bringing up Chernobyl. You're right, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. But no knowledge is worse. Keep taking the medication Ric Ha! Concise Oxford Dictionary, 2002 edition has:- epidemiologyn, the branch of medicine concerned with the incidence and distribution of diseases and other factors relating to health. -It, as a science, is not concerned with causative agents, merely with distribution. The correct quotation is:- "A little learning is a dang'rous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain And drinking largely sobers us again" Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism Ric, going to the bar for another glass of medication,W Quote Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Ha! Concise Oxford Dictionary, 2002 edition has:- epidemiologyn, the branch of medicine concerned with the incidence and distribution of diseases and other factors relating to health. It, as a science, is not concerned with causative agents, merely with distribution. I stand corrected on this, but not the after-effects of the Chernobyl melt-down. You are going for another pint, I'm going to work. b*****d. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.