Nik_B 3,790 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 More times their website gets visited the higher up the google rankings they go. Might be best to ignore them. Hi NiK-B.Been ignoring them for year,s.The baster,s wont go away.atb. Catcher I was just thinking if several hundred people started to do it, it would look like their sites are far more popular that they really are. I suspect interest in those outfits is going down as you don't see they campaigning in stockport/manchester like when they were trying to get fox hunting banned all tose years ago. Any idea if I'm right? Link to post Share on other sites
comanche 3,061 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) There have been many hunting folk on anti-sites for as long as there have been anti sites and hunting sites All part of what was known in the days of Imperial rivalry and the Cold War with Russia as "The Grand Game". Espionage ,counter espionage,intelligence gathering (some b*gger gathered mine years ago) ,no rules but grudging respect for the opponents inventive use of tactics . Here is the problem . Hunters hunt .It's what we do . Few of us really want to spend too much our valuable hunting time playing Kim Philby on the computer. The Antis though they may not hunt animals still have a very strong ,sometimes hate -filled instinct to harry ,to hound,to "hunt" those who they disagree with . They may not admit it but many of them enjoy the chase . Some sort of perversion of the hunting instinct urges them to hunt their fellow humans . In other words being an anti is their sport ,they are good at it ,they have multi national back-up . Tread carefully and if you recognise a writing style from another forum ,take note but don't blow anyone else cover . Ps Christ look at all the "guests" watching this forum ... Edited December 9, 2009 by comanche Link to post Share on other sites
bedrock 16 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites
Catcher 1 639 Posted December 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I always have thoroughly enjoyed intellectual debate with people who disagree with me, and i always will. What i cant stand is weak argumentative crap. . .i cant stand it ,and the anti sites are full of it . . .AND SO IS THIS ONE !! . .if you are debating a topic and you resort to calling those who disagree with you names ,as has happened on virtually every hot topic on here , then you completely weaken your position. It indicates that you either have no genuine argument to make or that you are unable to string a sentance together. If an anti calls me a moron , i know there is no reasoned debate to be had. . .if a fellow hunter calls an anti a retard , i just cringe with embarrasment. Another point, huge uninformed sweeping generalisations are another indicator of ill thought out argument. There are very few walks of life where all of anything are the same, it shows limited life experience to categorise in this way . . All bull x s are . . . .All collie x s are . . . All hunters are . . . All antis are . . . Im just saying that you are no more likely to get an intelligent reasoned debate on an anti site than you are in the lurcher forum on this one. Thats not to say there isnt reasoned debate to be had, but you are almost gauranteed to get someone saying "i disagree with you so you are a retard and everyone who is 5foot 10 knows nothing about hunting" or some equally mindless comment. Its annoying when its someone who disagrees with you . .its excruciating when its someone who agrees with you. So have a go on the anti sites but i promise it will be as frustrating as trying to get a sensible debate on here !!! Hi mate.Read your own post.Then think about it.Intelligent reasonal debate with an anti.Get a grip Link to post Share on other sites
Swampy 147 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I always have thoroughly enjoyed intellectual debate with people who disagree with me, and i always will. What i cant stand is weak argumentative crap. . .i cant stand it ,and the anti sites are full of it . . .AND SO IS THIS ONE !! . .if you are debating a topic and you resort to calling those who disagree with you names ,as has happened on virtually every hot topic on here , then you completely weaken your position. It indicates that you either have no genuine argument to make or that you are unable to string a sentance together. If an anti calls me a moron , i know there is no reasoned debate to be had. . .if a fellow hunter calls an anti a retard , i just cringe with embarrasment. Another point, huge uninformed sweeping generalisations are another indicator of ill thought out argument. There are very few walks of life where all of anything are the same, it shows limited life experience to categorise in this way . . All bull x s are . . . .All collie x s are . . . All hunters are . . . All antis are . . . Im just saying that you are no more likely to get an intelligent reasoned debate on an anti site than you are in the lurcher forum on this one. Thats not to say there isnt reasoned debate to be had, but you are almost gauranteed to get someone saying "i disagree with you so you are a retard and everyone who is 5foot 10 knows nothing about hunting" or some equally mindless comment. Its annoying when its someone who disagrees with you . .its excruciating when its someone who agrees with you. So have a go on the anti sites but i promise it will be as frustrating as trying to get a sensible debate on here !!! FEK OFF YOU'RE TALKING BOLLOX Rgds Swampy Teasening Link to post Share on other sites
comanche 3,061 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I’ve just asked a question on a anti site in the vegy and vegan section. Eating animals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Personally I don’t eat meat but this got me thinking if god didn’t want us to eat animals then why did he make them out of food? Any input appreciated. thanks allot. No replys so far Probably blown your cover by showing a sense of humour . No .Raising this one might get a response though . Peter Singer (a big animal rights guru) stated that<" ..sex with animals does not always involve cruelty">. In fact read as much Singer as you can before venturing onto any anti-site .So much scope for philosophical stirring . Link to post Share on other sites
.terrier man. 193 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 f**k OFF GUESTS.I THINK YOU SHOULDNT BE ABLE TO VIEW FORUM TOPICS UNLESS YOUR A MEMBER, BECAUSE ITS PRITY OBVIOUS WHO THEY ARE Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Wat has amazed me on one of the anti site's the north west hunt sabs is the amount of information on court cases dateing back to the 80s were peoples names are on even though they were not guilty its the reason i had a look to see if my name and address was on.[bANNED TEXT] this info came on the internet a lad got some greif over a case from over 25years ago and has never kept hunting dogs he just went for a day out with his mates Link to post Share on other sites
bedrock 16 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Ive just asked a question on a anti site in the vegy and vegan section. Eating animals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Personally I dont eat meat but this got me thinking if god didnt want us to eat animals then why did he make them out of food? Any input appreciated. thanks allot. No replys so far Probably blown your cover by showing a sense of humour . No .Raising this one might get a response though . Peter Singer (a big animal rights guru) stated that<" ..sex with animals does not always involve cruelty">. In fact read as much Singer as you can before venturing onto any anti-site .So much scope for philosophical stirring . The reply Animals aren't made out of food. They're made out of meat and blood, just like us. Further, just because we eat them doesn't mean that they're made of food. I babysat children who ate wax crayons. Does that mean that wax is food? Why did god make crayons if he didn't want us to eat them? Bad god, Bad god!! Some people are thick It is blatantly obvious that it is a wind up Yet they still argue. How should I reply? Link to post Share on other sites
shaun dee 7 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 any links to an anti site please .shaun Link to post Share on other sites
mcass123 6 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 they can join this site no problem so thats all the more reason for some guys to stop sayin too much on here about what they do etc only an opinion lads atb mcass123 Link to post Share on other sites
mcass123 6 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I always have thoroughly enjoyed intellectual debate with people who disagree with me, and i always will. What i cant stand is weak argumentative crap. . .i cant stand it ,and the anti sites are full of it . . .AND SO IS THIS ONE !! . .if you are debating a topic and you resort to calling those who disagree with you names ,as has happened on virtually every hot topic on here , then you completely weaken your position. It indicates that you either have no genuine argument to make or that you are unable to string a sentance together. If an anti calls me a moron , i know there is no reasoned debate to be had. . .if a fellow hunter calls an anti a retard , i just cringe with embarrasment. Another point, huge uninformed sweeping generalisations are another indicator of ill thought out argument. There are very few walks of life where all of anything are the same, it shows limited life experience to categorise in this way . . All bull x s are . . . .All collie x s are . . . All hunters are . . . All antis are . . . Im just saying that you are no more likely to get an intelligent reasoned debate on an anti site than you are in the lurcher forum on this one. Thats not to say there isnt reasoned debate to be had, but you are almost gauranteed to get someone saying "i disagree with you so you are a retard and everyone who is 5foot 10 knows nothing about hunting" or some equally mindless comment. Its annoying when its someone who disagrees with you . .its excruciating when its someone who agrees with you. So have a go on the anti sites but i promise it will be as frustrating as trying to get a sensible debate on here !!! how long did it take you to come up wi this shit???? Link to post Share on other sites
mcass123 6 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 7 guests on at the moment, probably antis, if you are then fcuk off and hug some trees admin - ban guests from accessing this site, if they wanna look then they need to join and be a member anyone agree???? mcass Link to post Share on other sites
.terrier man. 193 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 yes mate thats what im saying in my post TO MANY GUESTS have a look Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I always have thoroughly enjoyed intellectual debate with people who disagree with me, and i always will. What i cant stand is weak argumentative crap. . .i cant stand it ,and the anti sites are full of it . . .AND SO IS THIS ONE !! . .if you are debating a topic and you resort to calling those who disagree with you names ,as has happened on virtually every hot topic on here , then you completely weaken your position. It indicates that you either have no genuine argument to make or that you are unable to string a sentance together. If an anti calls me a moron , i know there is no reasoned debate to be had. . .if a fellow hunter calls an anti a retard , i just cringe with embarrasment. Another point, huge uninformed sweeping generalisations are another indicator of ill thought out argument. There are very few walks of life where all of anything are the same, it shows limited life experience to categorise in this way . . All bull x s are . . . .All collie x s are . . . All hunters are . . . All antis are . . . Im just saying that you are no more likely to get an intelligent reasoned debate on an anti site than you are in the lurcher forum on this one. Thats not to say there isnt reasoned debate to be had, but you are almost gauranteed to get someone saying "i disagree with you so you are a retard and everyone who is 5foot 10 knows nothing about hunting" or some equally mindless comment. Its annoying when its someone who disagrees with you . .its excruciating when its someone who agrees with you. So have a go on the anti sites but i promise it will be as frustrating as trying to get a sensible debate on here !!! how long did it take you to come up wi this shit???? Probably rather longer than it took you to come up with yours. And of course your reply is precisely the sort of reasoned discussion that we really need on this site. It makes hunters out to be....what? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts