gnasher16 30,046 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I think charging the lad with manslaughter is about the best option really. Something needs to be done to get through to these chavs that they will be made responsible for any actions there dogs may carry out. As long as he gets banged up for a few years i'll be happy. Pitbulls or any other powerfull agressive breeds should not be kept around children! I guess its fine if its the same for all people and all breeds......otherwise can you imagine a copper explaining to a dead childs mother " sorry mrs.smith we cant prosecute as the dog was legal ".....or.... " sorry mrs.smith we cant prosecute as the dog belonged to a pensioner " Quote Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I think the authorities are walking down a dodgy road with trying to do the fella for manslaughter.....have the pakies who bred the dog that killed the little girl from liverpool been tracked down and charged with manslaughter as well. If a rottweiler go,s nuts and kills a kid next week will the breeder or owner of that be charged with manslaughter or only people who own illegal breeds ? i mean a kids no less dead if its killed by a legal breed right ? If i go and blow someones head off with a shotgun will the person be any less dead or the punishment be any less if i had a gun licence therefore making it a legal weapon ?.......i dont think they have thought this one through. Google up 'manslaughter', gnasher. In law, it's not the same as 'murder'. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hagar 5 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 MANSLAUGHTER IS WHAT IT IS REGARDLESS OF BREED , THE GRANDMOTHER SHOULD BE CHARGED TOO, AFTER SEEING A PIC OF THE DOG ID SAY IT WAS AN AMERICAN BULLDOG NOT A PIT BULL, NOT THAT IT MATTERS WHAT DOG IT WAS A KID IS DEAD , PEOPLE MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR DOGS Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick 7 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I think charging the lad with manslaughter is about the best option really. Something needs to be done to get through to these chavs that they will be made responsible for any actions there dogs may carry out. As long as he gets banged up for a few years i'll be happy. Pitbulls or any other powerfull agressive breeds should not be kept around children! What do you class as powerfull agressive breeds And its a shame the lad died but not all pitts are like that Mick.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Strong Stuff 2,171 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 MANSLAUGHTER IS WHAT IT IS REGARDLESS OF BREED , THE GRANDMOTHER SHOULD BE CHARGED TOO, AFTER SEEING A PIC OF THE DOG ID SAY IT WAS AN AMERICAN BULLDOG NOT A PIT BULL, NOT THAT IT MATTERS WHAT DOG IT WAS A KID IS DEAD , PEOPLE MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR DOGS Where did you see the photo of the dog mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,046 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 (edited) MANSLAUGHTER IS WHAT IT IS REGARDLESS OF BREED , THE GRANDMOTHER SHOULD BE CHARGED TOO, AFTER SEEING A PIC OF THE DOG ID SAY IT WAS AN AMERICAN BULLDOG NOT A PIT BULL, NOT THAT IT MATTERS WHAT DOG IT WAS A KID IS DEAD , PEOPLE MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR DOGS Absolutely right....... And droid,i know what manslaughter means.........however.... a dog is a dog and dead is dead !...or is it not quite so serious if a nice labrador kills a kid. Edited December 3, 2009 by gnasher16 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hagar 5 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 the pic is on bulliez utd its a white dog theres a link on the thread Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 ... AFTER SEEING A PIC OF THE DOG ID SAY IT WAS AN AMERICAN BULLDOG NOT A PIT BULL... I've heard other people say the same thing, that it was an American Bulldog and not a Pitbull like the media has been saying it was. Have you got a link to the picture please mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Strong Stuff 2,171 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Just my opinion, but it doesn't matter a shit what sort of dog it is or isn't, there's a little lad dead, is owning any dog legal or illegal worth that? Not aimed at anyone particular by the way, but who gives a f**k what it is, amateur breeding, no doubt for the money, has created some extremely untrustworthy mongrels. Hope the scum who've bred the back out out of these types of animals for money are proud of their child killing machines. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 So that's the dog is it, Looks like it could have a bit of both in it to me. What a shame though, that poor kid. I was just reading a news report on it, and they had a pic of the little boy and it makes me think just how important my kids are to me. The family must be in the horrors, god knows what they're going through. Real shame this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hagar 5 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Couldnt agree more strong stuff that hits nail on head, just a shame these money grabbin shit peddlers dont get a nail in the head too Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,046 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I remember a while back having an argument with one of these peddling pricks.....he said whats the difference,a certain person peddled dogs off the old skipper dog......i said back then and i,ll say it again now.....with a breed bred specifically for the pit....the further away from the pit these dogs are bred the more trouble they will cause !.....and these recent " pit bull attacks " prove this theory correct..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOKEL 2,227 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I remember a while back having an argument with one of these peddling pricks.....he said whats the difference,a certain person peddled dogs off the old skipper dog......i said back then and i,ll say it again now.....with a breed bred specifically for the pit....the further away from the pit these dogs are bred the more trouble they will cause !.....and these recent " pit bull attacks " prove this theory correct..... i'd say this, if the dogs were only ever kept for their original purpose, rather than punted out to every tom dick and harry, the general public would not even know they existed let alone be mauled to death by them. unfortunately greed takes over in all walks of life. i well remember the build up to the passing of the dda, and i say thing are a lot worse now... Yokel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Steve McHardy 2 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Just my opinion, but it doesn't matter a shit what sort of dog it is or isn't, there's a little lad dead, is owning any dog legal or illegal worth that? Not aimed at anyone particular by the way, but who gives a f**k what it is, amateur breeding, no doubt for the money, has created some extremely untrustworthy mongrels. Hope the scum who've bred the back out out of these types of animals for money are proud of their child killing machines. my heart goes out to the family rip lad. its a shame that these gutless f*ckwits that feel the need to own dogs to give them the back bone they sadly lack think they are blameless when the dogs attack kids these idiots think that the dogs go with there "image" i admire the bull breeds for what they are these are dogs which should be worked or given some sort of job they can be ideal pets in the right hands but idiots turn them into weapons its not the dogs fault. how do we change the outlook of the public when these horrible accidents keep on happening. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted December 4, 2009 Report Share Posted December 4, 2009 i'd say this, if the dogs were only ever kept for their original purpose, rather than punted out to every tom dick and harry, the general public would not even know they existed let alone be mauled to death by them. unfortunately greed takes over in all walks of life. i well remember the build up to the passing of the dda, and i say thing are a lot worse now... Yokel. Correct, I agree with every bit of that. They think by making it illegal to have a Pitbull in the UK that people are going to listen lol what a joke. Heroin is an illegal drug in the UK yet we're rammed to the hilt with drug addicts. So long as there is a demand for something, people will find a way to make money from it, legal or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.