cassshantia 16 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 having my firearms in the process at the moment and ive put a .17 hmr and .243 on the ticket,my quarry been in wood land mostly just wondering if someone can help me choose a scope for my shooting to get the maximum light and magnification req'd ive opted for a cz 16"varmint for the .17hmr but not chose a .243 as yet any comments more than welcome please thanks lee Quote Link to post
kernel gadaffi 0 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Like a lot of HMR owners, I have a Simmons WTC 6.5-20X50 fitted to mine and it is laser accurate, some use the Nikko Nighteater and some use MTC 4-16X50 or 6-24X50, all good scopes, have a look on airgunbbs, then again it might cause you more headaches Quote Link to post
jamie g 17 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 bushnell for the right money mate. optics more clear then the mtc. i had a mtc for 3 years and it served wellbut not a patch on the bushnell Quote Link to post
bob.243 8,537 Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Have a 6x18-50 Bushnell Dusk to Dawn on my .17HMR it's pin sharp and great for lamping. Bob. Quote Link to post
anschutz.17hmr 0 Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 (edited) my hmr wears a leupold vx111 4.5-14x50,and sako finnlight .243 has a hungarian schmidt and bender 8x56.rememember if you can,t see it you can,t shoot it Edited November 15, 2009 by anschutz.17hmr Quote Link to post
MrYou 0 Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 what ever your budget is , get the best you can afford. I use Bushnell sportsman 3-9x 40 perfect & the freezer is full. Quote Link to post
fireblade_rrw 20 Posted November 21, 2009 Report Share Posted November 21, 2009 (edited) Permit me to add my tuppenceworth as a newbie to this site, but with 30 years shooting experience: IMO, scopes fall into probably 3 categories, mostly related to the quality of optics: Best = expensive: Swarovski, S&B, Zeis, Docter Then a large gap to Leupold, Meopta, etc. (Nightforce is the exception, jap optics, quite good, very expensive, but not as good as the German/Austrian stuff) Then you drop down to Bushnell, Hawke, and all the other jap or Chinese optic also rans. Dont be fooled by claims from cheaper manufacturers that theirs is just as good as German optics - simply isnt true. In my opinion, the best price v quality is Docter. I've used Docter, Swaro's, Zeiss & S&B, and to be honest, there isnt a lot between them. My latest purchase is the 3x12-56 Iluminated Docter, and for the price of around 850 quid, its quite simply a stunning scope, especially in low light. Have a look at this low-light scope test: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=19859 Edited November 21, 2009 by fireblade_rrw Quote Link to post
andyf 144 Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 Hello: Leupold are the best value for money around in my opinion. The 'Best' Europeans Schmidt, Doctor etc are also very good (You choose). But you get what you pay for, cheap scopes are 'cheap scopes' In my opinion a 'good' scope cannot cost less than £750, yes I know that's a lot but sadly it's the truth! If you cannot pay that much then stick with a 'fancy' airgun scope from China/Far East, they are a 'near miss' and will do the job. The Leupold VX3 range take some beating, I have three 30mm tube VX3's and an old LPS (Very good but cost over £1,000, but is still the 'best' 10 years later!). If you can go to America on holiday, and buy the Leupold you need there at $ instead of £. Andy F. Quote Link to post
jamie g 17 Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 (edited) Permit me to add my tuppenceworth as a newbie to this site, but with 30 years shooting experience: IMO, scopes fall into probably 3 categories, mostly related to the quality of optics: Best = expensive: Swarovski, S&B, Zeis, Docter Then a large gap to Leupold, Meopta, etc. (Nightforce is the exception, jap optics, quite good, very expensive, but not as good as the German/Austrian stuff) Then you drop down to Bushnell, Hawke, and all the other jap or Chinese optic also rans. Dont be fooled by claims from cheaper manufacturers that theirs is just as good as German optics - simply isnt true. In my opinion, the best price v quality is Docter. I've used Docter, Swaro's, Zeiss & S&B, and to be honest, there isnt a lot between them. My latest purchase is the 3x12-56 Iluminated Docter, and for the price of around 850 quid, its quite simply a stunning scope, especially in low light. Have a look at this low-light scope test: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=19859 agree but you mist out kahles scope out at the top end range. and the bushnell elite range are as good as the leupolds of the same price easy Edited December 2, 2009 by jamie g Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.