Rainmaker 7 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I've been wondering about this for a while now, as they don't seem to have anything on their policy pages about it. Along with rumours of being 'in bed' with the arsepca, I was starting to wonder... As it turns out they DO explain their stance quite clearly on their Land & People sub-site. Although not directly in favour of hunting per se, neither are they anti. In fact I found their views quite balanced, considering: ZaNu Labour's Marxist class hatred and the hunting ban November 26, 2008 by Simon Bennett Filed under Animal Welfare, Hunting Comments (0) For a number of years now we, at Land & People, have been telling you that ZaNu Labour's motivation in the introduction of anti-hunt legislation was "traditional" Marxist class hatred pure and simple. All their talk about "animal welfare" being just more of the dishonest spin one expects from this gang of self-serving spivs and proven through their support for the most prolific form of animal abuse in Britain today – ritual slaughter! And, of course, we are not the only people alert to ZaNu Labour duplicity as the following piece from a Countryside Alliance document shows: "You might have missed it but last week saw another significant landmark in the campaign for the repeal of the Hunting Act. Just as, shortly after the Act was passed, then Labour MP Peter Bradley's statement that the Hunting Act was about "class war" was an admission of something that we had known for a very long time, another Labour MP has now confessed. John McDonnell, MP for Hayes and Harlington and Chair of the Socialist Campaign Group of MPs, has owned up to the least surprising error of the decade. The Hunting Act, he says: "took a long time. There was a lot of discussion. We thought we got it right, but we clearly haven't in this instance". So there we are. 700 hours of parliamentary time, a 'totemic' issue for the Labour party and the use of the Parliament Acts has got us, just three and a half years later, to a point where even the Act's most vociferous supporters are admitting that it doesn't work. 'We told you so', is not exactly original but what else is there to say?" For the record, neither Land & People nor the British National Party have a policy on hunting – this being a matter of choice, rather than of oversight. This is because, in our opinion, issues of this nature are best left to local communities to resolve, preferable through the democratic device of local referenda. This is not a matter for national government and certainly not one that justifies the use (abuse!) of the Parliament Act! Sorry if it's been brought up before, but in recent threads the possibility of the BNP being anti was bandied about but nobody seemed to know for sure. I thought this might provide a clearer answer and some food for thought, as it were. I'm not particularly pro-BNP and am still a floating vote. I just know I wouldn't vote Labour if my life depended on it. In fact, I think it's safe to say my (way of) life depends on NOT voting Labour. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AKA-BRINDLE 879 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I've been wondering about this for a while now, as they don't seem to have anything on their policy pages about it. Along with rumours of being 'in bed' with the arsepca, I was starting to wonder... As it turns out they DO explain their stance quite clearly on their Land & People sub-site. Although not directly in favour of hunting per se, neither are they anti. In fact I found their views quite balanced, considering: ZaNu Labour's Marxist class hatred and the hunting ban November 26, 2008 by Simon Bennett Filed under Animal Welfare, Hunting Comments (0) For a number of years now we, at Land & People, have been telling you that ZaNu Labour's motivation in the introduction of anti-hunt legislation was "traditional" Marxist class hatred pure and simple. All their talk about "animal welfare" being just more of the dishonest spin one expects from this gang of self-serving spivs and proven through their support for the most prolific form of animal abuse in Britain today – ritual slaughter! And, of course, we are not the only people alert to ZaNu Labour duplicity as the following piece from a Countryside Alliance document shows: "You might have missed it but last week saw another significant landmark in the campaign for the repeal of the Hunting Act. Just as, shortly after the Act was passed, then Labour MP Peter Bradley's statement that the Hunting Act was about "class war" was an admission of something that we had known for a very long time, another Labour MP has now confessed. John McDonnell, MP for Hayes and Harlington and Chair of the Socialist Campaign Group of MPs, has owned up to the least surprising error of the decade. The Hunting Act, he says: "took a long time. There was a lot of discussion. We thought we got it right, but we clearly haven't in this instance". So there we are. 700 hours of parliamentary time, a 'totemic' issue for the Labour party and the use of the Parliament Acts has got us, just three and a half years later, to a point where even the Act's most vociferous supporters are admitting that it doesn't work. 'We told you so', is not exactly original but what else is there to say?" For the record, neither Land & People nor the British National Party have a policy on hunting – this being a matter of choice, rather than of oversight. This is because, in our opinion, issues of this nature are best left to local communities to resolve, preferable through the democratic device of local referenda. This is not a matter for national government and certainly not one that justifies the use (abuse!) of the Parliament Act! Sorry if it's been brought up before, but in recent threads the possibility of the BNP being anti was bandied about but nobody seemed to know for sure. I thought this might provide a clearer answer and some food for thought, as it were. I'm not particularly pro-BNP and am still a floating vote. I just know I wouldn't vote Labour if my life depended on it. In fact, I think it's safe to say my (way of) life depends on NOT voting Labour. As it says above they DONT have a policy on hunting and as the BNP has it roots in the NF which was ANTI FOX HUNTING i doubt the BNP would over turn the ban on hunting with dogs if they got in which lets be honest aint gonna happen most likely be the Tories and i bet you dont see david Cameron riding with the hounds betwen now and May...sorry to say for the avarage lurcher and terrier lads nothings gonna change...take care and happy hunting Quote Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhitehunter 47 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 id rather the sport be banned but have the country sorted out to be honest.... i never thought id say it but there is more important things than hunting out there.... VOTE BNP Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.