poacher3161 1,766 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 news letter from BNP QUESTION TIME ROUND-UP Fellow British Patriot "The man's got guts!" "At last, someone saying exactly what we all feel". "The hand-picked audience in the studio hated what Nick had to say, but we loved it". "I've never seen such political bullying on TV in my life." "When he pointed out how all the others are racist against the English, we were all cheering". Just a few of the responses to the long-awaited BBC Question Time with Nick Griffin tonight. It was never going to be easy: Central London is the most 'enriched' and 'diverse' part of Britain, the BBC audience selection process is clearly guaranteed to 'weed out' politically incorrect guests, and the other panellists shared one aim: to rough up Nick Griffin. As it is, no-one who saw Jack Straw turn ashen-faced when Nick responded to his 'Nazi' smear by pointing out that "my father served in the RAF during the Second World War - yours spent it in prison for refusing to fight Adolf Hitler." Time and time again Nick gave as good as he got. Most of all though, this wasn't a proper Question Time at all. The usual format was done away with for the first time in 30 years as the BBC over-compensated for allowing us on by setting things up for a televised lynching. There was nothing about current affairs at all; no postal strike, nothing about the announcement that Tony Blair is about to be appointed EU President, nothing about the continued slaughter of young British soldiers in Afghanistan, nothing about the latest stages of the banking crisis and the scandal of the Government propping up corrupt banks while imposing savage cuts on essential services. On all those subjects and many more, the BNP's nationalist position offers a real alternative to the three old internationalist parties. But the only non-BNP/immigration question was about a Daily Mail article on the death of Stephen Gately, and even that was a trap - which Chairman Nick Griffin avoided with both ease and principle. Where does it leave the BNP? On this day alone our website has had in the region of 15 million 'hits' and over 2,000 new registrations for future membership before QT even started! Millions were shocked by the violence of the leftist mob sponsored by - among other MPs - Peter Hain and David Cameron. With millions more people beginning to grasp the extent to which the three old parties are essentially the same, while the British National Party is really different. With millions of people knowing that in just a couple of killer soundbites in the middle of the programme, Nick Griffin summed up exactly how they, and all their friends and neighbours, feel about the mess that Lib-Lab-Con have made of our poor country. They will also have noted very well that Nick Griffin and Bonny Greer clearly got on well, and that Nick listened with respect and answered with consideration even hostile questions from members of ethnic minorities in the audience; the hostility tonight wasn't from Nick towards anyone on account of their ethnicity or religion, it was from the representatives of the failed old parties towards the new kid on the block. When the details of all the personal attacks against Nick Griffin are long forgotten, people will remember him standing up bravely to a barrage of hate to say things on behalf of the Silent Majority that have never been said on the flagship programme of British politics before. "Nick Griffin - he speaks for us". I speak as an ex miner and ordinary working class he does speak for us.atb dell Link to post Share on other sites
justin 2 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 all you talk about is the rspca.rspca.rspca....ffs, get over it and look at the bigger picture.....didnt you notice that when the old guy asked the question about the countrys economic state, there being no work about and still more pakis being allowed in it just got blanked and he asked someone else to ask a question...this country has a lot more important problems than the hunting ban...its banned now, and we all still do it....... Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 .... This whole 'indigenous' british thing is a red herring, which has been designed to move the media focus away from the white supremacists who are still very prevalent in the organisation. You cannot compare America and Australia to britain as they were only discovered a few centuries ago, whereas Britain has been the subject of immigration and emigration for 17000 years. There is a true English people as there is True Scots, and True Welsh It is true we've always had immigration but never to the extent that we are having to deal with today, and never was the average indigenous man made to feel awkward about saying what he truly feels in his own country. I do feel we're having our culture manipulated and taken from us, whilst we're constantly being badgered to except other peoples cultures and how we must respect them for who they are. I agree with you, but I do NOT believe that voting for people who do the nazi salute, and want to 'repatriate' others is the answer. Taking the argument to the other extreme, does that mean that you are against sunday trading, abortion, contraception, and pubs opening on sundays? The problem is that we've had 12 years of pseudo-socialism, and the BNP are using that to their advantage to pretend to be a 'normal' political party. What is hiding behind that façade is a gang of white supremacists, who want to inflict their warped sense of justice on our now mixed race population. It's too late to change the make up of our nation, although I do think that all future immigration should be stopped, and we should decide to either be Christian, or Secular. Link to post Share on other sites
Wxm 1,638 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 . As far as I'm concerned, the RSPC@ are my enemy. If you support a party that supports them, then so are you. think your going to have a lot of enemys then fella Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 The main 2 only have themselves to blame for forcing people to support the BNP. I wont vote for them, but there's so much that I agree with BNP on that I can fully understand why someone would vote for them. People have just had ENOUGH! They've voted for the Conservatives in the past, they've voted Labour in the past and both have just shit on their public so where else will the people go? Too the Lib Dems who aren't so different to the other 2 apart from the fact that they're even shitter than what them pair are? People want change from the type that has lied and cheated to them for all these years, and the BNP seem to be the only option. Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 all you talk about is the rspca.rspca.rspca....ffs, get over it and look at the bigger picture.....didnt you notice that when the old guy asked the question about the countrys economic state, there being no work about and still more pakis being allowed in it just got blanked and he asked someone else to ask a question...this country has a lot more important problems than the hunting ban...its banned now, and we all still do it....... I WILL CARRY ON REMINDING PEOPLE THAT THE BNP SUPPORT THE RSPC@ (OUR OPPONENTS). If you think that is all I've been saying, then I'd guess you must have skipped about 11 pages! And the questioner you refer to on QT did not mention 'Pakis', he spoke of immigration. And, I agreed with the question and was disapointed that no-one was allowed to answer it. Link to post Share on other sites
John Keswick 119 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 .... This whole 'indigenous' british thing is a red herring, which has been designed to move the media focus away from the white supremacists who are still very prevalent in the organisation. You cannot compare America and Australia to britain as they were only discovered a few centuries ago, whereas Britain has been the subject of immigration and emigration for 17000 years. If you actually believe that Matt, then the government of the past couple of decades have done a good mind job on you, OR you are a immigrant yourself. I did think you looked a bit suspect when i met you, but didnt like to say anything Link to post Share on other sites
Wxm 1,638 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 all you talk about is the rspca.rspca.rspca....ffs, get over it and look at the bigger picture.....didnt you notice that when the old guy asked the question about the countrys economic state, there being no work about and still more pakis being allowed in it just got blanked and he asked someone else to ask a question...this country has a lot more important problems than the hunting ban...its banned now, and we all still do it....... Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 .... This whole 'indigenous' british thing is a red herring, which has been designed to move the media focus away from the white supremacists who are still very prevalent in the organisation. You cannot compare America and Australia to britain as they were only discovered a few centuries ago, whereas Britain has been the subject of immigration and emigration for 17000 years. If you actually believe that Matt, then the government of the past couple of decades have done a good mind job on you, OR you are a immigrant yourself. I did think you looked a bit suspect when i met you, but didnt like to say anything I make my own mind up. The only thing the last twelve years has shown me is that the british electorate is very gullible. That is what worries me about the BNP. Link to post Share on other sites
Waz 4,252 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 all you talk about is the rspca.rspca.rspca....ffs, get over it and look at the bigger picture.....didnt you notice that when the old guy asked the question about the countrys economic state, there being no work about and still more pakis being allowed in it just got blanked and he asked someone else to ask a question...this country has a lot more important problems than the hunting ban...its banned now, and we all still do it....... I WILL CARRY ON REMINDING PEOPLE THAT THE BNP SUPPORT THE RSPC@ (OUR OPPONENTS). If you think that is all I've been saying, then I'd guess you must have skipped about 11 pages! And the questioner you refer to on QT did not mention 'Pakis', he spoke of immigration. And, I agreed with the question and was disapointed that no-one was allowed to answer it. Yeh you also said,, "As far as his history is concerned, he is a convicted holocaust denier." Where did you hear this? Link to post Share on other sites
justin 2 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 all you talk about is the rspca.rspca.rspca....ffs, get over it and look at the bigger picture.....didnt you notice that when the old guy asked the question about the countrys economic state, there being no work about and still more pakis being allowed in it just got blanked and he asked someone else to ask a question...this country has a lot more important problems than the hunting ban...its banned now, and we all still do it....... I WILL CARRY ON REMINDING PEOPLE THAT THE BNP SUPPORT THE RSPC@ (OUR OPPONENTS). If you think that is all I've been saying, then I'd guess you must have skipped about 11 pages! And the questioner you refer to on QT did not mention 'Pakis', he spoke of immigration. And, I agreed with the question and was disapointed that no-one was allowed to answer it. i do appologise rat, the man didnt say the "p" word...i did, but i bet he would have liked to and we all knew what he meant...well all but jack straw son of guttless war dodger :11: Link to post Share on other sites
Waz 4,252 Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I got the distinct impression that the other 3 parties represented on QT know full well that the BNP are getting a lot of votes and interest due to their own lacking policies on immigration. Hence their strong attempts of bullying NG and misquoteing, even misqouteing the video which they said cant be misquoted!!! They have got to try and throw as much shit at the BNP and hope it sticks, otherwise they are going to be forced to listen to what the british people are demanding re immigration. Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Yeh you also said,, "As far as his history is concerned, he is a convicted holocaust denier." Where did you hear this? It can be seen HERE He has a controversial past, which includes a 1998 conviction for incitement to racial hatred for material denying the Holocaust. And he failed to deny it when asked tonight on Question Time. There is no doubt about his racist past - he has admitted it - but he keeps claiming that he's 'changed'. Do I believe that he could have changed his opinions? Possibly. Do I believe that he could change the opinions of the majority of his party members? No. Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I got the distinct impression that the other 3 parties represented on QT know full well that the BNP are getting a lot of votes and interest due to their own lacking policies on immigration. Hence their strong attempts of bullying NG and misquoteing, even misqouteing the video which they said cant be misquoted!!! They have got to try and throw as much shit at the BNP and hope it sticks, otherwise they are going to be forced to listen to what the british people are demanding re immigration. He's a trained lawyer, so I'm sure if he's been libelled by the BBC or anyone on the show, he'll soon enough sue. Somehow, I don't think he will. Link to post Share on other sites
Waz 4,252 Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Yeh you also said,, "As far as his history is concerned, he is a convicted holocaust denier." Where did you hear this? It can be seen HERE He has a controversial past, which includes a 1998 conviction for incitement to racial hatred for material denying the Holocaust. And he failed to deny it when asked tonight on Question Time. There is no doubt about his racist past - he has admitted it - but he keeps claiming that he's 'changed'. Do I believe that he could have changed his opinions? Possibly. Do I believe that he could change the opinions of the majority of his party members? No. Nick Griffin was not convicted for being a holocaust denier, as you said. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts