Tallyho 181 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 do you not belive we are over run in our own country and have too little say's??? i for one think its diabolical the fact that we have to call christmas, xmas and schools cant teach a well known nursery rhym "Bah bah black sheep" in case we affend someone. and im not being funny but just think how many people go hunting what they should'nt even thou theres a ban on. do you really think cause someone else is in power their going to stop THEIR WAY OF LIFE??? We had our turning on of the christmas lights in town changed to , the turning on of the winter festival lights , just in case it offended .What bollocks . Link to post Share on other sites
dare 1,103 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 anyone agree with my post on page 10? Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dbull86 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 well lets see what the public think in the next election i bet they do better then excpected and the bully tactics of the bbc the audience and the rest of the bench has stood him in better ways then ever before,they will not silence the man,they cant now Link to post Share on other sites
John Keswick 119 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 He failed to answer questions, and behaved in a 'shifty' manner avoiding answering some questions asked of him, and contradicting himself several times. How is that any different from any other politician when asked questions which are awkward for them to answer? Link to post Share on other sites
Wxm 1,638 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 news letter from BNP QUESTION TIME ROUND-UP Fellow British Patriot "The man's got guts!" "At last, someone saying exactly what we all feel". "The hand-picked audience in the studio hated what Nick had to say, but we loved it". "I've never seen such political bullying on TV in my life." "When he pointed out how all the others are racist against the English, we were all cheering". Just a few of the responses to the long-awaited BBC Question Time with Nick Griffin tonight. It was never going to be easy: Central London is the most 'enriched' and 'diverse' part of Britain, the BBC audience selection process is clearly guaranteed to 'weed out' politically incorrect guests, and the other panellists shared one aim: to rough up Nick Griffin. As it is, no-one who saw Jack Straw turn ashen-faced when Nick responded to his 'Nazi' smear by pointing out that "my father served in the RAF during the Second World War - yours spent it in prison for refusing to fight Adolf Hitler." Time and time again Nick gave as good as he got. Most of all though, this wasn't a proper Question Time at all. The usual format was done away with for the first time in 30 years as the BBC over-compensated for allowing us on by setting things up for a televised lynching. There was nothing about current affairs at all; no postal strike, nothing about the announcement that Tony Blair is about to be appointed EU President, nothing about the continued slaughter of young British soldiers in Afghanistan, nothing about the latest stages of the banking crisis and the scandal of the Government propping up corrupt banks while imposing savage cuts on essential services. On all those subjects and many more, the BNP's nationalist position offers a real alternative to the three old internationalist parties. But the only non-BNP/immigration question was about a Daily Mail article on the death of Stephen Gately, and even that was a trap - which Chairman Nick Griffin avoided with both ease and principle. Where does it leave the BNP? On this day alone our website has had in the region of 15 million 'hits' and over 2,000 new registrations for future membership before QT even started! Millions were shocked by the violence of the leftist mob sponsored by - among other MPs - Peter Hain and David Cameron. With millions more people beginning to grasp the extent to which the three old parties are essentially the same, while the British National Party is really different. With millions of people knowing that in just a couple of killer soundbites in the middle of the programme, Nick Griffin summed up exactly how they, and all their friends and neighbours, feel about the mess that Lib-Lab-Con have made of our poor country. They will also have noted very well that Nick Griffin and Bonny Greer clearly got on well, and that Nick listened with respect and answered with consideration even hostile questions from members of ethnic minorities in the audience; the hostility tonight wasn't from Nick towards anyone on account of their ethnicity or religion, it was from the representatives of the failed old parties towards the new kid on the block. When the details of all the personal attacks against Nick Griffin are long forgotten, people will remember him standing up bravely to a barrage of hate to say things on behalf of the Silent Majority that have never been said on the flagship programme of British politics before. "Nick Griffin - he speaks for us". Link to post Share on other sites
Tallyho 181 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 He failed to answer questions, and behaved in a 'shifty' manner avoiding answering some questions asked of him, and contradicting himself several times. How is that any different from any other politician when asked questions which are awkward for them to answer? strwa acted the same way when asked about immagration ?? Link to post Share on other sites
Swampy 147 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 I am now officially a sad twunt. Couldn't wait to get here a see what was posted. It was from a completely unbiased opinion an ambush! Where was the incissive political questioning? Any questions on the postal strike? No! Lets try and expose Nick for what he really is ( or what we want you to believe he is). The BNP is NOT a Fascist party. Learn youfekin politics ffs. Yes he was nervous, who wouldn't be? But unfortunately he tried to address the questions before he was shouted down. And where the fek was the Chair? Dimbleby should be ashamed of himself! If they wanted togive him enough rope to hang himself they failed. Did you read the texts that were sent in? 60/40 to the BNP I'd say. What a shame and anticlimax to what could have been a healthy informative debate. Shame on the BBC to allow such bias. Swampy Not a fascist and ninging in fury Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 do you not belive we are over run in our own country and have too little say's???i for one think its diabolical the fact that we have to call christmas, xmas and schools cant teach a well known nursery rhym "Bah bah black sheep" in case we affend someone. and im not being funny but just think how many people go hunting what they should'nt even thou theres a ban on. do you really think cause someone else is in power their going to stop THEIR WAY OF LIFE??? Go back and read my opinions on the overcrowed state of the UK in earlier posts. I still do not believe that voting for Nazis is the answer. By all means, close the doors, draw up the drawbridge and stop further immigration, but please, what the hell did we fight the second world war for if it wasn't to defeat Nazism. If immigration is such a huge issue for you, vote for a party that is likely to get into power and do something about it (Conservatives), but please, do not vote for racist thugs. he took a good @rse rapein .... but never the les he's got my vote I think on the OVER ALL SCALE OF THINGS, IN THE BIGGER PICTURE of the future of our nation, you are making too much of this RSPCA issue....really. I reckon a lot of normal people were sitting at home clapping and cheering (quietly of course, incase they upset anyone)promising to get out and vote when the next election comes around. Hunting, and fieldsports in general, are very important to me. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it is my culture. I strongly resent the position the RSPC@ have taken on hunting sports and tail docking, and therefore would never vote for a party or individual that works for them, contributes to them, or supports them. I don't think that many of the people who vote for the BNP really look too far into the party, it's policies, or it's history. They see mass immigration as an issue, and think that political correctness is unfair, and (wrongly) think that voting for the BNP will somehow make that better. It wont. As far as I'm concerned, the RSPC@ are my enemy. If you support a party that supports them, then so are you. If, on the other hand, you didn't realise that the BNP actively support them, then take a moment or two to consider that..... Link to post Share on other sites
lee81 190 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 should of been put to air in a bnp strong haul not west london,i will be voting bnp now and yes that interview changed my mind well done nick, he took a good @rse rapein .... but never the les he's got my vote Can I ask why? Is it their immigration policy? Or could it be that they support the RSPC@? No true hunting supporter could seriously support the BNP could they? YES Link to post Share on other sites
bird 9,861 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 there are probly a lot more supporters of the bnp in that area but they didnt want an equal audience. CORRECT! The audience was a heavily biased one, that the BBC no doubt handpicked for the show. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dbull86 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 should of been put to air in a bnp strong haul not west london,i will be voting bnp now and yes that interview changed my mind well done nick, he took a good @rse rapein .... but never the les he's got my vote Can I ask why? Is it their immigration policy? Or could it be that they support the RSPC@? No true hunting supporter could seriously support the BNP could they? YES well iam a very true hunting man and i support them as do my family, so yes from me,now of lamping and i will let you internet hunters decide whos with who Link to post Share on other sites
T78 4 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 my mrs made a very interesting point....nick griifin was getting bullied and walked all over but the "british people always love an underdog!" and thats a point that is only reinforced on here,after all,how many posts on the bnp on here manage to get this long without decending into slanging matchs? this one has and the veiw is seemingly pro bnp.just imagine what the view is like accross the country?! nick will be laughing all the way to the polling stations!! Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 .... This whole 'indigenous' british thing is a red herring, which has been designed to move the media focus away from the white supremacists who are still very prevalent in the organisation. You cannot compare America and Australia to britain as they were only discovered a few centuries ago, whereas Britain has been the subject of immigration and emigration for 17000 years. There is a true English people as there is True Scots, and True Welsh It is true we've always had immigration but never to the extent that we are having to deal with today, and never was the average indigenous man made to feel awkward about saying what he truly feels in his own country. I do feel we're having our culture manipulated and taken from us, whilst we're constantly being badgered to except other peoples cultures and how we must respect them for who they are. Link to post Share on other sites
macberran 2 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 I do not support them, the BNP , nor could I read the whole thread. We had it later in Wales due too schedule change. What I did find in essence was a kangaroo court. 90% of questions directed at him. He held as well as he could his own, though what I witnessed made me cringe, it was a witch hunt I now realise why he is getting the vote. Cowardice and innefectiveness, when the tables turned on other members of the panel......wobble, gobble,blah,blah. then it was back too yer man. Fair play he stuck it out 'a mans a man fer aw that'. and he very eloquently said ,I had the opportunity(freedom of speech now) the invite and he took it no harm done. Shoe on other foot would his interogators have done it ...............NA. Fair play that took balls. Still would never get my vote though. Link to post Share on other sites
Tallyho 181 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 As far as I'm concerned, the RSPC@ are my enemy. If you support a party that supports them, then so are you. then so be it , im your ememy aswell then . Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts