BBC NEWS

[Flynn 314]

inan you write

.IT WASNT THE LEGAL COURSING PEOPLE THAT HELPED THE ANTIS GET THE BAN THROUGH FAR FROM IT!

but a line of fellows walking across a field with coursing dogs was used in the ban as much as stag hounds ripping a stag to pieces or foxhounds with a fox all on permission

soorry your wrong,again

Perhaps its me ,but I can't see the point of your argument.

Maybe , you could rephrase it?

By the way ,where was I wrong in the first place?

since when did lines of men walking the line stop legal hare coursing

and Stag hounds ripping a Stag to pieces have, You done either?

It was the Goverment numpty!!

[inan 841]

its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .

good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing

what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline .

Farmers, in the areas mentioned ,are having hares shot to discourage illegal coursing . i am sorry, I don't see the logic of your argument.

read the first part of the report that was written ,about the so called ban because of the decline of the brown hare ,like i said its a joke ,a load of bollocks ,just like every other report .

,

Anyone who has taken the trouble to read the Hunting Act knows that the ban was brought in on grounds of cruelty,rightly or wrongly,not to protect the numbers of Brown Hares, that is just an example of the BBC getting it wrong again, rather like the reference to "blood sports", instead of "field sports".

The Police ran true to form ,with the copper saying its illegal to hunt mammals ,what are rabbits and rats? Bloody reptiles!

[UNFIT 0]

its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .

good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing

what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline .

Farmers, in the areas mentioned ,are having hares shot to discourage illegal coursing . i am sorry, I don't see the logic of your argument.

read the first part of the report that was written ,about the so called ban because of the decline of the brown hare ,like i said its a joke ,a load of bollocks ,just like every other report .

,

Anyone who has taken the trouble to read the Hunting Act knows that the ban was brought in on grounds of cruelty,rightly or wrongly,not to protect the numbers of Brown Hares, that is just an example of the BBC getting it wrong again, rather like the reference to "blood sports", instead of "field sports".

The Police ran true to form ,with the copper saying its illegal to hunt mammals ,what are rabbits and rats? Bloody reptiles!

that is what i was pointing out ,but for some reason you said you could not see my argument ,i was not arguing ,just pointing some thing out that was written wrongly by the reporter . .and what is more cruel than a slow death by poisioning ,that is what is happening to the hares because of the pesticides the farmers are using Edited October 16, 2009 by UNFIT

[inan 841]

They always seem to interview people who have differculty putting hare coursing over in a good light, or it maybe they edit and only air what they want to portray ie coursing is barbaric and cruel!!!

Seems to me there are people on here that have difficulty putting hare coursing in a good light.

Though the interviewer was obviously biased.He did not need much help to win his case did he?

 

That fella's argument that he is doing" pest control", first question ",have you permission"? Answer, "no".

Collapse of argument.

[inan 841]

its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .

good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing

what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline .

Farmers, in the areas mentioned ,are having hares shot to discourage illegal coursing . i am sorry, I don't see the logic of your argument.

read the first part of the report that was written ,about the so called ban because of the decline of the brown hare ,like i said its a joke ,a load of bollocks ,just like every other report .

,

Anyone who has taken the trouble to read the Hunting Act knows that the ban was brought in on grounds of cruelty,rightly or wrongly,not to protect the numbers of Brown Hares, that is just an example of the BBC getting it wrong again, rather like the reference to "blood sports", instead of "field sports".

The Police ran true to form ,with the copper saying its illegal to hunt mammals ,what are rabbits and rats? Bloody reptiles!

that is what i was pointing out ,but for some reason you said you could not see my argument ,i was not arguing ,just pointing some thing out that was written wrongly by the reporter . .and what is more cruel than a slow death by poisioning ,that is what is happening to the hares because of the pesticides the farmers are using

The decline of the brown hare has been attributed to several things, farming practices being one of them.

The way land is in continuous use now ,for one,intensive cultivation,,stubble is turned in allmost immediately. Foxes take a lot of leverets . I dont know the answers, and won't pretend I do.

What I do know is previously ,when coursing was legal, hares thrived on land where it was practised.

 

I spoke to two men at the East Of England Show ,both told me that it certain areas they have permission on ,hares are shot in great numbers"you wont believe how many they have shot over the last month", one guy told me.

It saddens me to hear it,and, one of the incentives, from the farmers point of view is to deter illegal coursing,no hares -no coursing.

[Leeview 791]

inan's post about the BBC getting it wrong, "illegal coursing"? pre ban coursing took place with the landowners permission if you did nt have the landowners permission surely thats poaching? you dont get illegal pheasant shoots

Y.I.S Leeview

[inan 841]

inan's post about the BBC getting it wrong, "illegal coursing"? pre ban coursing took place with the landowners permission if you did nt have the landowners permission surely thats poaching? you dont get illegal pheasant shoots

Y.I.S Leeview

Is that a vote for me ? Or against me?

I must be getting punch drunk,3 glasses of wine ,and I'm having difficulty grasping the arguments tonight ,must be my age, time for bed .Ferreting tommorow

[Flynn 314]

inan's post about the BBC getting it wrong, "illegal coursing"? pre ban coursing took place with the landowners permission if you did nt have the landowners permission surely thats poaching? you dont get illegal pheasant shoots

Y.I.S Leeview

Is that a vote for me ? Or against me?

I must be getting punch drunk,3 glasses of wine ,and I'm having difficulty grasping the arguments tonight ,must be my age, time for bed .Ferreting tommorow

its a vote for You Inan, Leeview has now gone out with the dogs

have a god day tomorrow!!

[whippetlad1976 33]

there looking at us every angle now eh? choppers the lot!!! they seem to think pedos and rapist are ok then???? f**k em the country is f****d anyway lets start immigrant coursing there is no law on that is there?

 

atb yis

[lee81 190]

there looking at us every angle now eh? choppers the lot!!! they seem to think pedos and rapist are ok then???? f**k em the country is f****d anyway lets start immigrant coursing there is no law on that is there?

 

atb yis

THAT WHULD BE FUN

[Guest lurchers&terriers]

why drive over the land though? why such big gangs? whats ever happened to coming and going causing no disruption. not being seen or heard so you can come back another day and do the same. honestly these c**ts must be dull as f**k. You have no permission so its ok you can wreck the land let the farmer know you been there and f**k it up for everyone else. stupid pricks.

[inan 841]

inan's post about the BBC getting it wrong, "illegal coursing"? pre ban coursing took place with the landowners permission if you did nt have the landowners permission surely thats poaching? you dont get illegal pheasant shoots

Y.I.S Leeview

Is that a vote for me ? Or against me?

I must be getting punch drunk,3 glasses of wine ,and I'm having difficulty grasping the arguments tonight ,must be my age, time for bed .Ferreting tommorow

its a vote for You Inan, Leeview has now gone out with the dogs

have a god day tomorrow!!

Thanks ,hope he had a good night lamping.

[kristian 9]

Surely if people just stop ripping up farmers feilds in 4x4s and mowing their fences down then there wouldn't be so much attention brought to it? If i ever went poaching you wouldn't notice i'd been there.

[desertdog 149]

the twat in the interview did,nt have a clue, and the knob interveiwing was,nt much better, cruel and barbaric he never mention it was illegal, typical media bullshit, lets get a thick twat who knows jack about it in the first place and get another thicker rude inbred to interview him,.

[johnny boy68 11,726]

the twat in the interview did,nt have a clue, and the knob interveiwing was,nt much better, cruel and barbaric he never mention it was illegal, typical media bullshit, lets get a thick twat who knows jack about it in the first place and get another thicker rude inbred to interview him,.