hungry bollucks 0 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing Quote Link to post
UNFIT 0 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline . Edited October 16, 2009 by UNFIT Quote Link to post
Guest Bennybhoy Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 they asked me to remove my cap , i said NO CL hare coursing is totally unacceptable :a ngel: Quote Link to post
WILF 46,662 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 If you think the goverment are going to let a few lads go quietly about there business as long as they dont create too much hassle then your right, they will.......................but if you think the goverment will allow gangs of arseholes to go blasting around the countryside behaving like complete animals then they wont!! It aint big and it certainly aint clever..........these people are a cancer that will kill the rest of us off and they will simply move on to the next thing to good around at! Quote Link to post
Guest robbie1 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 laughed at the 1st line "hare coursing has gone underground"!!!!!!! i thought that was digging myself!!! robbie Quote Link to post
Thomsons dogs 37 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 If you think the goverment are going to let a few lads go quietly about there business as long as they dont create too much hassle then your right, they will.......................but if you think the goverment will allow gangs of arseholes to go blasting around the countryside behaving like complete animals then they wont!! It aint big and it certainly aint clever..........these people are a cancer that will kill the rest of us off and they will simply move on to the next thing to good around at! A THINK PEOPLE THAT GOT CAUGHT LAST YEAR WOULD HAVE HAD A LITTLE LETTER JUST A WEE REMINDER FOR THEM ITS ADDICTIVE Quote Link to post
stealthy1 3,964 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Two land owners I have permission for have shot all the hares to stop motor poachers, thanks for f*****g it up for everyone else lads Quote Link to post
bri1970 22 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 If you think the goverment are going to let a few lads go quietly about there business as long as they dont create too much hassle then your right, they will.......................but if you think the goverment will allow gangs of arseholes to go blasting around the countryside behaving like complete animals then they wont!! It aint big and it certainly aint clever..........these people are a cancer that will kill the rest of us off and they will simply move on to the next thing to good around at! could'nt be better put wilf.a local coursing spot of mine has been ruined by dickheads,walking the land mob handed killing summer hares.they get lifted every time they go out.some of the so called big names round my area are the worst culprits,fifty odd year old blokes who should know better.f**king pathetic men.. Quote Link to post
Guest joe ox Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 They always seem to interview people who have differculty putting hare coursing over in a good light, or it maybe they edit and only air what they want to portray ie coursing is barbaric and cruel!!! Quote Link to post
inan 841 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 DID ANYONE SEE THE BBC NEWS,I JUST WANT TO KNOW HOW PEOPLE ON HERE FEEL ABOUT WHATS GOING ON WITH THE ABUSE TO FARMERS ETC,I THINK THAT SORT OF BEHAVIOUR GIVES THE REST OF US A BAD NAME AND MAKES OBTAINING NEW PERMISSION A FECKING NIGHTMARE Here is a post |I put up a year ago on this. Posted on: Feb 8 2008, 03:59 PM Extreme Hunter Group: Members Posts: 1365 Joined: 19-May 06 Member No.: 2670 Warn: (0%) Illegal coursing has helped to put the final nail in the coursing coffin ,imo.In many cases Farmers that were ,if not pro coursing ,became decidedly anti,when confronted by gangs of men in 4x4s on their land ,that is the unpalatable truth,and I speak from experience ,having belonged to coursing clubs for a good few years,,I know first hand of ground we have lost because of illegal coursers,summertime numptys ,and the "we ran through the foot and mouth brigade"Your statement is incorrect Joe,and as you told me yourself you have done little coursing on the Fens ,where the bulk of the problem exists.Im no whiter than white as a youngster I did my share of running early in the morning ,on the Plain,Newmarket ,6 Mile Bottom etc,but for you to suggest that legal coursers aided the antis in bringing in a ban is ludicrous.When I talk about illegal coursers,Im not referring to the one or two lads that might slip out for a run on a Sunday morning or whatever,to some extent a lot of Farmers have tolerated these,I refer to mobhanded crowds .What accomodations people have made with Farmers that enable them to still do a spot of "rabbiting",are entirely their own business,,Im not condemning any one ,just challenging your statement.Icould give you the names of four farmers in the Lincs Cambs and Suffolk areas,that until very recently were still up for a spot of retreiving of hares,owing to their encounters with illegal s those doors are now closed,and even if the ban were overturned ,it would be extremely difficult to obtain running permission on their land,that is entirely due to the behaviour of a small section of lurchermen.,running illegally.IT WASNT THE LEGAL COURSING PEOPLE THAT HELPED THE ANTIS GET THE BAN THROUGH FAR FROM IT! Quote Link to post
inan 841 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline . Farmers, in the areas mentioned ,are having hares shot to discourage illegal coursing .I am sorry, I don't see the logic of your argument. Edited October 16, 2009 by inan Quote Link to post
stealthy1 3,964 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline . Farmers, in the areas mentioned ,are having hares shot to discourage illegal coursing . i am sorry, I don't see the logic of your argument. No hare's, no problems, would you spend time driving around fields that you have not seen hare's in, because I would'nt Quote Link to post
UNFIT 0 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 its just shows how much of a joke it is ,read the first part of the report ,it states that the law was changed to protect the brown hair , then listen to the farmer in the second vid say ,that the farmers are responsible for killing the hares because of the way farming is practiced at this time ,if they cared that much about the hare they would have changed the way farming is carried out at the same time they brought in the ban , and got it right by now .so in the farmers own words they are the ones responsable for the hares decline ,are they being done for it ,are they hell .good point unfit but if the farmer used dogs to catch and kill them would they be done for illeagal coursing what about this ,if the farmer was to allow some thing to get into a river or stream ,and it polluted it ,and it killed all the fish ,he would get done by the EA ,and would have to pay a big fine and all the cost ,so what is the difference ,none.but he can get away with admiting to killing hares in big numbers ,that were protected because they say they were in decline . Farmers, in the areas mentioned ,are having hares shot to discourage illegal coursing . i am sorry, I don't see the logic of your argument. read the first part of the report that was written ,about the so called ban because of the decline of the brown hare ,like i said its a joke ,a load of bollocks ,just like every other report ., Quote Link to post
UNFIT 0 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 The Hunting act needs amending, it was Wrong and Unjust in the first place and it AINT WORKING and NEVER WILL as its an abuse of indiginus BRITISH peoples CULTURAL and HUMAN rights. Hunting in all forms should be brought back under licence ie same as fishing a yearly £30 POUNDS to obtain a licence enabeling you to hunt in all forms so long as you have the landowners permission to do so. This way gangs in motors tearing across fields ect the book could be thrown at them, and your average law abiding man will be left alone giving police the time and resources to catch REAL CRIMINALS. If it were licenced it would also help weed out the miniscule numbers in our ranks who do nothing but give us bad press. It would be benificial for the countryside as a whole, wildlife, flaura and fauna as well as creating desprately needed Rural jobs. I sincerely hope a Conservitive goverment will see sense and have the balls to give back to Britain our Country and Birthright. then it all comes down to money ,the have and the have not syndrome .that is the prob with most of the people in this country no back bone to say sod you just like the french do if they dont agree with some thing .nothing will ever change ,so just get on with what you like doing ,because it wont be here for ever . Quote Link to post
inan 841 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 inan you write.IT WASNT THE LEGAL COURSING PEOPLE THAT HELPED THE ANTIS GET THE BAN THROUGH FAR FROM IT! but a line of fellows walking across a field with coursing dogs was used in the ban as much as stag hounds ripping a stag to pieces or foxhounds with a fox all on permission soorry your wrong,again Perhaps its me ,but I can't see the point of your argument. Maybe , you could rephrase it? By the way ,where was I wrong in the first place? Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.