jinxnjill 0 Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 thought id had a tough renewal, the fao called 7 different land owners then called my refs twice , called me three times, then said why do i want to keep my deer rifle??? even though i have permission to shoot deer on 6 different sites, smallest being a good 400 acre.. got sorted out at lat min thankfully... off putting to say the least Quote Link to post
Jaggsy 25 Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Well done for standing your ground Mark (i've got my own drama brewing here) Martin Quote Link to post
markbivvy 6 Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 For £30 lads sacs do take some beating. Quote Link to post
markbivvy 6 Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Had a good few pm,s and emails from lads who have had or are having the same sort of trouble from there FLD. best bet it to get on to sacs as the more people that do the sooner firearms departments who have bad track records can be sorted. or bend over and take it. Quote Link to post
RicW 67 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 What bugs me is that these people can't read their own bloody rule book. I know I go on about this but Home Office guidance to FEOS specificaly lists 243 as RECOMMENDED for fox. All the .22 centrefires, 5.56, .243, 6mm PPC, 6mm/.244. I suppose it's too much to expect a Firearms Enquiry Officer (laughingly so-called) to know anything about firearms but why can't they Ric I really am concerned about this. If a Firearms Officer passes a given piece of land for .22lr does that mean that no-one can ever use that land to shoot a "bigger" calibre? I may be wrong on this, but I thought that if the land was passed for, say, .22, all that means is that it is acceptable to use firearms up to that calibre. If you wish to use a bigger calibre you should either apply for the calibre or show that you have an open certificate. Quote Link to post
markbivvy 6 Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 What bugs me is that these people can't read their own bloody rule book. I know I go on about this but Home Office guidance to FEOS specificaly lists 243 as RECOMMENDED for fox. All the .22 centrefires, 5.56, .243, 6mm PPC, 6mm/.244. I suppose it's too much to expect a Firearms Enquiry Officer (laughingly so-called) to know anything about firearms but why can't they Ric I really am concerned about this. If a Firearms Officer passes a given piece of land for .22lr does that mean that no-one can ever use that land to shoot a "bigger" calibre? I may be wrong on this, but I thought that if the land was passed for, say, .22, all that means is that it is acceptable to use firearms up to that calibre. If you wish to use a bigger calibre you should either apply for the calibre or show that you have an open certificate. thats what 1 feo told me, but its boll ox. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.