new lurcher 0 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 alryt every one i am talkin with one of me mates now an we both have diffrent oppions could i have your .... he thinks a dog is well better when it has scares on it because he thinks it will make it go for anythink my oppion is if the dog has scares it only shows its took jib of what ever its bin smashin and i have seen plenty of dogs smashin fox and come out with no makrs and that to me is a better dog could you please let me no your oppion thanks new L Link to post Share on other sites
Kay 3,709 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Think ,most dogs will get some knocks & scars during there working life, goes with the territory, perhaps your friend likes being seen with a battered looking scared dog because it makes him look hard Link to post Share on other sites
the_stig 6,614 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 i`d have an early night and forget the conversation ever took place .. Link to post Share on other sites
stabba 10,745 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Tbh mate, every dog which comes into contact with the sharp end is going to get bitten at sometime or other. Obviously the more the dog sees the more marked up its going to get. I dont care what dog it is,every dog in the heavy quarry game is going to get bit. atb stabba Link to post Share on other sites
new lurcher 0 Posted July 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 (edited) i no obv dogs r goin to get bitten but say if a dog smashes a fox an cum out wif nothink an another one smashed an fox an cums out all smashed that dosnet mean its any better dog in my eyes and i would mutch pefer my dogs to cum out with nothink Edited July 21, 2009 by new lurcher Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Disgution????? kids these days Link to post Share on other sites
OldNog 432 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 I wouldnt say a scarred dog shows its a good dog, it could well go the other way and show its not much use when it comes to the kill!! However every dog will get marked up sooner or later. A rougher or denser coat will hide scars aswell making it look like the dog dont have none Link to post Share on other sites
hector 1 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 i had two dogs they were brothers both could kill foxes pre ban but 1 could kill them without hardly geeting a mark the other would get in a hell of a mess i think the 1 who would kill quick and hardly get touched was a clever dog but not a better dog as both did the job jmo Link to post Share on other sites
swanseajack 227 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 alryt every one i am talkin with one of me mates now an we both have diffrent oppions could i have your .... he thinks a dog is well better when it has scares on it because he thinks it will make it go for anythink my oppion is if the dog has scares it only shows its took jib of what ever its bin smashin and i have seen plenty of dogs smashin fox and come out with no makrs and that to me is a better dog could you please let me no your oppion thanks new L jujing by ewer post ew ar a prick or an anti, not even a cock of ewer bad speeelin coud speel that baddd or asssk such a khunt of a kwestion.. now fffuk off .. and as for you pricks that answered .... Link to post Share on other sites
new lurcher 0 Posted July 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 alryt every one i am talkin with one of me mates now an we both have diffrent oppions could i have your .... he thinks a dog is well better when it has scares on it because he thinks it will make it go for anythink my oppion is if the dog has scares it only shows its took jib of what ever its bin smashin and i have seen plenty of dogs smashin fox and come out with no makrs and that to me is a better dog could you please let me no your oppion thanks new L jujing by ewer post ew ar a prick or an anti, not even a cock of ewer bad speeelin coud speel that baddd or asssk such a khunt of a kwestion.. now fffuk off .. and as for you pricks that answered .... fuk of ya fukin joke and no am not a anti and how the fuk has that came into the ansers about being a anti you fukin nobody little prik i was sayin im in a digustion with a lad who i no hes getting a pup and he said he gone get parents that are smashed up cos that means thay are gd dogs and i think the oppisite so how the fuk is tha a anti carnt you read or somethink ya lil dick head Link to post Share on other sites
doga 50 Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 i had two dogs they were brothers both could kill foxes pre ban but 1 could kill them without hardly geeting a mark the other would get in a hell of a mess i think the 1 who would kill quick and hardly get touched was a clever dog but not a better dog as both did the job jmowould have thought that the dog that finish the job quick with minimal damage would be the better,he would in my opinion be worked more frequently haveing less damage thus less sore but just an opinion obviously not gospel. Link to post Share on other sites
new lurcher 0 Posted July 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 i had two dogs they were brothers both could kill foxes pre ban but 1 could kill them without hardly geeting a mark the other would get in a hell of a mess i think the 1 who would kill quick and hardly get touched was a clever dog but not a better dog as both did the job jmowould have thought that the dog that finish the job quick with minimal damage would be the better,he would in my opinion be worked more frequently haveing less damage thus less sore but just an opinion obviously not gospel. thanks at least i no theres a few genuine ppl on this site ... Link to post Share on other sites
hector 1 Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 i had two dogs they were brothers both could kill foxes pre ban but 1 could kill them without hardly geeting a mark the other would get in a hell of a mess i think the 1 who would kill quick and hardly get touched was a clever dog but not a better dog as both did the job jmowould have thought that the dog that finish the job quick with minimal damage would be the better,he would in my opinion be worked more frequently haveing less damage thus less sore but just an opinion obviously not gospel. agree with you mate but he got the most work in the deepest places but the harder dog was used inthe shallower earths tried to give the same aount of work but you and i know that never happens the dog who could kill quick and clean did see more of the work so yes ou could probably say i thought more of him and that is my honest oppinion mate atb hector Link to post Share on other sites
Wild_and_Irish 11 Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 i had two dogs they were brothers both could kill foxes pre ban but 1 could kill them without hardly geeting a mark the other would get in a hell of a mess i think the 1 who would kill quick and hardly get touched was a clever dog but not a better dog as both did the job jmowould have thought that the dog that finish the job quick with minimal damage would be the better,he would in my opinion be worked more frequently haveing less damage thus less sore but just an opinion obviously not gospel. I agree you want the dog to kill the fox, not fight it! Link to post Share on other sites
david2363 42 Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 This disgution is goowin nouwere. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts