crumblyned 0 Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) Sorry to be a pain in the proverbial BUTT, I need some more advice please I have the choice of the Tikka t3 varmint or the Remington 700 vss kevlar varmint (both new and in 308) I would like your comments on the better rifle of the two Thanks Ned Edited June 4, 2009 by crumblyned Quote Link to post
Mr_Logic 5 Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 What's the length of barrel on that Tikka? Quote Link to post
arveyboy 0 Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 i'm guessing you want the varmint barrel for targets. the remington offers more customisation in future which could get you a fantastic shooting target rifle if you throw some money at it. however i've heard that tikkas are always great shooters straight out of the box whereas some remmy's arent so good. depends how much money you want to put into it i spose Quote Link to post
crumblyned 0 Posted June 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 What's the length of barrel on that Tikka? 20" inch Quote Link to post
Mr_Logic 5 Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 OK. This leaves you with a dilemma. I note from your other thread this is for foxes, deer and targets in the future. Therein lies the problem. Foxes and deer = shorter barrel for balance with a moderator and light weight. Targets = longer barrel for powder burn & better velocity. Now, there are some sites on the web which suggest 308 doesn't get affected by a longer barrel, but the F/TR boys shoot 30-inch, and they get better velocity than I can from my 26", so it's got to matter somewhere! For target work, unless you're buying a rifle which is a specific target rifle (generally custom anyway) then I've basically gone with the adage that "Look into other rifles besides a Remington, prefer something else, and then buy the Remington anyway." Reason is pretty simple - every time you find something on a Remy you don't like, you can fix it. Costs you more in the long run for sure, but you end up with a rifle closer to what you actually want. Out of the box, a Remington is reliable and accurate (unless faulty, in which case you're dealing with Edgar Brothers, probably the best importer in the UK). You can customise until you're happy, or you can leave it alone - it'll still shoot well. So I'd get the Remington IF you're serious about shooting targets. Otherwise, the 20-inch barreled Tikka is going to win for the stalking. For the record, the best way to do this is with two rifles, a light one for stalking, where you don't need a heavy barrel, and a different rifle for target, where you do. Quote Link to post
crumblyned 0 Posted June 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 OK. This leaves you with a dilemma. I note from your other thread this is for foxes, deer and targets in the future. Therein lies the problem. Foxes and deer = shorter barrel for balance with a moderator and light weight. Targets = longer barrel for powder burn & better velocity. Now, there are some sites on the web which suggest 308 doesn't get affected by a longer barrel, but the F/TR boys shoot 30-inch, and they get better velocity than I can from my 26", so it's got to matter somewhere! For target work, unless you're buying a rifle which is a specific target rifle (generally custom anyway) then I've basically gone with the adage that "Look into other rifles besides a Remington, prefer something else, and then buy the Remington anyway." Reason is pretty simple - every time you find something on a Remy you don't like, you can fix it. Costs you more in the long run for sure, but you end up with a rifle closer to what you actually want. Out of the box, a Remington is reliable and accurate (unless faulty, in which case you're dealing with Edgar Brothers, probably the best importer in the UK). You can customise until you're happy, or you can leave it alone - it'll still shoot well. So I'd get the Remington IF you're serious about shooting targets. Otherwise, the 20-inch barreled Tikka is going to win for the stalking. For the record, the best way to do this is with two rifles, a light one for stalking, where you don't need a heavy barrel, and a different rifle for target, where you do. Thanks for the advice Mr. Logic, I understand and agree with what you say. And if it was just me to please I would have the two rifles but alas I have a budget and she is more savvy these days, the old one of telling her it cost £300-00 less than it did doesn’t wash no more. Ned Quote Link to post
SNAP SHOT 194 Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 OK. This leaves you with a dilemma. I note from your other thread this is for foxes, deer and targets in the future. Therein lies the problem. Foxes and deer = shorter barrel for balance with a moderator and light weight. Targets = longer barrel for powder burn & better velocity. Now, there are some sites on the web which suggest 308 doesn't get affected by a longer barrel, but the F/TR boys shoot 30-inch, and they get better velocity than I can from my 26", so it's got to matter somewhere! For target work, unless you're buying a rifle which is a specific target rifle (generally custom anyway) then I've basically gone with the adage that "Look into other rifles besides a Remington, prefer something else, and then buy the Remington anyway." Reason is pretty simple - every time you find something on a Remy you don't like, you can fix it. Costs you more in the long run for sure, but you end up with a rifle closer to what you actually want. Out of the box, a Remington is reliable and accurate (unless faulty, in which case you're dealing with Edgar Brothers, probably the best importer in the UK). You can customise until you're happy, or you can leave it alone - it'll still shoot well. So I'd get the Remington IF you're serious about shooting targets. Otherwise, the 20-inch barreled Tikka is going to win for the stalking. For the record, the best way to do this is with two rifles, a light one for stalking, where you don't need a heavy barrel, and a different rifle for target, where you do. Thanks for the advice Mr. Logic, I understand and agree with what you say. And if it was just me to please I would have the two rifles but alas I have a budget and she is more savvy these days, the old one of telling her it cost £300-00 less than it did doesn’t wash no more. Ned The only advice i can give bar the above is to ask yourself what will the rifle mainly be ised for if foxes, and deer mainly i'd go with the tikka occasional target work still tikka, if your going to shoot more targets than foxes or deer get the remmy.. snap. Quote Link to post
cyclonebri1 8 Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 OK. This leaves you with a dilemma. I note from your other thread this is for foxes, deer and targets in the future. Therein lies the problem. Foxes and deer = shorter barrel for balance with a moderator and light weight. Targets = longer barrel for powder burn & better velocity. Now, there are some sites on the web which suggest 308 doesn't get affected by a longer barrel, but the F/TR boys shoot 30-inch, and they get better velocity than I can from my 26", so it's got to matter somewhere! For target work, unless you're buying a rifle which is a specific target rifle (generally custom anyway) then I've basically gone with the adage that "Look into other rifles besides a Remington, prefer something else, and then buy the Remington anyway." Reason is pretty simple - every time you find something on a Remy you don't like, you can fix it. Costs you more in the long run for sure, but you end up with a rifle closer to what you actually want. Out of the box, a Remington is reliable and accurate (unless faulty, in which case you're dealing with Edgar Brothers, probably the best importer in the UK). You can customise until you're happy, or you can leave it alone - it'll still shoot well. So I'd get the Remington IF you're serious about shooting targets. Otherwise, the 20-inch barreled Tikka is going to win for the stalking. For the record, the best way to do this is with two rifles, a light one for stalking, where you don't need a heavy barrel, and a different rifle for target, where you do. Thanks for the advice Mr. Logic, I understand and agree with what you say. And if it was just me to please I would have the two rifles but alas I have a budget and she is more savvy these days, the old one of telling her it cost £300-00 less than it did doesn’t wash no more. Ned Pay 1/2 cash and 1/2 on the card, show er indoors the card receipt Works for me So far Quote Link to post
Mr_Logic 5 Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 LOL! My other half shoots, so she knows what stuff costs... Quote Link to post
flytie 1 Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Pay 1/2 cash and 1/2 on the card, show er indoors the card receipt Works for me So far I wish I was that brave Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.