ordha 1 Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Death knell for hunting ban as police abandon monitoring operations Valerie Elliott, Countryside Editor Police forces are to stop monitoring hunts in a change of policy that sounds the death knell for the hunting ban, The Times has learnt. New guidance from the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) states that gathering evidence of illegal hunting is difficult, that the ban is hard to enforce and that chief constables have more pressing priorities. In future, forces should rely on anti-hunt activists to produce information, it says. But they should also be “very cautious†of such groups and recognise that hunting is an “emotionally charged†subject. Hunts will also no longer be required to inform police in advance of the time and place of meets and their planned route. Related Links Charities in dispute over culling magpies ANALYSIS: Cutbacks mean juggled priorities Richard Brunstrom, Chief Constable of North Wales and the Acpo spokesman on rural affairs, said: “Hunting is definitely not a policing priority. It is not illegal to wear a red coat and ride a horse in a public place.†The new guidance undermines one of the most controversial pieces of legislation introduced by the Labour Government, which took up 700 hours of parliamentary time. Since the Hunting Act came into force in 2004, there have been eight prosecutions, of which only three have been successful, with one pending. Hunting has thrived. Mr Brunstrom said that police had to chose which areas of law enforcement to devote scarce resources to. He said: “If you look at hunting, the penalties do not include a prison sentence for offenders. This puts the Hunting Act to the lower rather than the higher end of offences. Parliament had the chance to include imprisonment as a sentence but did not do so.†The new guidance is not binding but was unanimously approved by the country’s most senior officers this week. Officers are urged to avoid “acrimonious, time consuming, frustrating and ultimately fruitless activityâ€. Senior officers expressed concern that their neutrality had been compromised by being forced to release details of meets through freedom of information requests to activists who had gone on to disrupt hunts. David Cameron, the Conservative leader, has made it clear that he favours a repeal of the Hunting Act and in the event of a general election victory will offer MPs a free vote in government time, although a backbencher would have to produce a Bill. Mr Brunstrom said: “I am pleased with the new guidance but hunting is definitely not a policing priority and don’t let me give you the impression it is. But that does not mean we are not going to deal with it. We recognise it is the law of the land and the duty of the police to enforce it — but to do so proportionately and according to priorities.†Mr Brunstrom said that forces needed a consistent approach in dealing with reports of unlawful hunting.He also raised concerns about militants becoming involved with anti-hunt organisations and said that police had to be cautious when people made complaints to them. He outlined the difficulties facing police. “If there are offences they are likely to be taking place in a remote rural environment. We are not very well equipped to follow hunts and get evidence and nor do we think we can justify it. Pursuing hunts is an expensive and sophisticated operation.†He accepted the need to train more police in hunt investigations and said he hoped that the pro-hunt Countryside Alliance and the RSPCA, the International Fund for Animal Welfare and the League Against Cruel Sports would attend training seminars to give their views. A hunt investigation manual is to be distributed to forces before the autumn season. The Countryside Alliance said: “We have always understood what a difficult job the police have in dealing with such a confusing piece of legislation. But the guidance suggests that the sort of engagement some police forces have had with animal rights groups should, quite rightly, be avoided.†A spokesman for the League Against Cruel Sport said: “We fought for years for the hunting ban and, while we accept it is not a high priority for police, a ban was the will of Parliament and is the will of the people and we are going to press for more prosecution cases to be brought.†Have your say Im just going to start my 25th season as a hunt supporter and i love the sport, i was three when i first went out with my father i love the sound of hounds on a trail, its great. i am not a weathy person, the huntsman of the pack i follow is retiring after 42 years can't wait till the season starts! Joanne Wright, Northumberland, Most posters seem to be missing the point. Brunstrom has been defining or bending laws in North Wales for ages, particularly wrt speeding. All those in favour of his approach should beware they do not happen to commit an offence that he deems is massively important regardless of the actual law. Alex, Salisbury, UK The so called "rich and elite" are just a small part of the hunting community. Many thousands of working class people also hunt by following the footpacks of the north, and long may they continue. Chris Breen, Hyde, England Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jamie93 57 Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 About time. Police should be spending their time after drug dealers and sicko's that mug little old ladies, not huntsman. Happy Hunting Jamie93 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bullxryno 21 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 cant remember which paper i was reading the other day at work! but it was saying about the genaral elections that if the conservatives get to power they where going to lift the hunting ban!!!! wether it is true or not or just saying it so you vote for them i dont know!! but i do hope it is true!! ATB BullXRyno Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertdog 149 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 excellent if it happens, this should be shown where more can see it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
badgeroy 3 Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 (edited) A spokesman for the League Against Cruel Sport said: “We fought for years for the hunting ban and, while we accept it is not a high priority for police, a ban was the will of Parliament and is the will of the people and we are going to press for more prosecution cases to be brought.†It was'nt the will of parliament B liar had to push it through with the Parliamentry Act that was meant to be used only as an emergency measure, used only 3 times since the last war, one of the other times he used it was to push through a law to allow homosexuality to be taught in schools Edited May 30, 2009 by badgeroy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.