BGD
-
Content Count
7,678 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by BGD
-
I might struggle with that one mate ..... I'm pretty sure that these are her crumpets though Pure filth!! I can't believe you've just posted her crumpets for the world to see, I thought you liked and respected the girl FFS :no:
-
So it was covered by both major TV news broadcasters and all major newspapers but according to tilimangro it still doesn't count as widely reported because he didn't catch it What a clown
-
Get Stuffed is still open, they've even joined the 21st Century and set up a website http://www.thegetstuffed.co.uk/
-
It was on the TV news (Sky at least, I saw it myself), not the media's fault you weren't watching at the time... Look at yourself, arguing over whether something was widely reported or not (it was) Twat. Oh yeah I forgot everyone's got sky newsThats the point It wasn't on all the news on the TVs but you still want to labour the point You're the twat mate Cant let go of the small stuff because it's all you've got I'm out "It wasn't on TV at the exact moment I was watching it so it wasn't widely reported!" Total fecking joker You keep saying I can't let go of the small stuff
-
It was on the TV news (Sky at least, I saw it myself), not the media's fault you weren't watching at the time... Look at yourself, arguing over whether something was widely reported or not (it was) Twat.
-
So because you weren't paying attention and missed the story that means it wasn't widely reported :laugh: Still waiting for you to tell me what would have been an acceptable level of coverage?
-
It was in every major UK paper and on Sky and BBC news, in what world is that not widely reported? How could it have been more widely reported? National billboard campaign? Read my first post in reply to Silversnake you clown, I said it was shameful behaviour.
-
So you now admit it WAS widely reported but you're unhappy with the prominence given to the story? Well that goes back to my earlier question to Silversnake, what level of coverage would have satisfied you?
-
I've avoided commenting up till nowYou're a plank bgd You're trolling and just trying to get a rise It wasn't "widely reported" I hadnt heard that and a lot of others hadn't If you wish to debate or discuss awesome crack on But what you're doing right now is trolling and being a first class c**t https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/08/saudi-arabia-footballers-ignore-minutes-silence-for-london-attack-victims http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/saudi-arabia-football-team-refuse-to-observe-minutes-silence-for-victims-of-london-terror-attack_uk_593a53c1e4b0b13f2c69206f h
-
Looks like it was quite widely reported to me, maybe you just weren't paying attention? Out of interest what level of coverage would you consider acceptable? Frontpage of every newspaper?
-
Saudi Arabia played Australia in a soccer world cup qualifier here in Adelaide a few days after the islamic terror attack in Manchester which included two Australians killed and the Saudi team refused to acknowledge the minute silence! The reason given, because it was against their 'culture' you couldn't make this $hit up. Reports from people in the crowd said the Saudi section also refused to pay their respects! At least we beat the low, stinking terrorist supporting scum... But guess what it was hardly reported by the msm, WTF!!! That really is shameful I'm not sure about it not being r
-
France's Marine Le Pen charged over funding scandal http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-40461551
-
Oh I've done plenty of research and all of it points to you being a total clown who's talking out of his arse on a subject he knows very little about. Happy to be proven wrong though
-
Sweet lord above..you have just proved yourself to be the clown you are corbyn jr...a lurcher whatever x is a family pet yous for its origanal purpose..work..they are socialised with family..friends children and other dogs..livestock and every other situation you can imagine..how the fek is that a dangerous dog.... Where did I say a lurcher was dangerous you total clown, I was talking about a proposed change to the law. Take your argument up with the lawmakers who proposed it. Still waiting for you to quote the relevant section of the Hunting Act that says it's legal to slip a lurcher on a
-
Wasn't the Dangerous Dogs Act amended so you're committing the offense of your dog being out of control in a public place if it attacks a wild animal? I seem to remember that being the case but I'm not 100%, will have to go and check the amendments. Just had a look and it seems that was talked about but in the end wasn't included, someone actually used common sense which is quite shocking actually!
-
The exemption for use of dogs below ground in the protection of birds for shooting specifically states the fox must be SHOT as soon as possible after bolting...Have you actually read the legislation? http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/37/schedule/1 So there is an exemption for fox do we agree?For protection of game birds in uk.. agree? Read the small print as they call it.. Im done talkin to you. You mean the small print where it says the fox must be SHOT not dispatched with a lurcher? Yeah, I read that...Holy fcuking stacks a poops, the most pompous, never wrong, biggest arsheoles
-
Sounds like you'll be able to turn them round if they're seeking out affection from you already that's a good sign, build that bond and get some good grub down them the rest will fall into place. Good on you for giving them a chance at a decent life
-
The exemption for use of dogs below ground in the protection of birds for shooting specifically states the fox must be SHOT as soon as possible after bolting... Have you actually read the legislation? http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/37/schedule/1 So there is an exemption for fox do we agree?For protection of game birds in uk.. agree? Read the small print as they call it.. Im done talkin to you. You mean the small print where it says the fox must be SHOT not dispatched with a lurcher? Yeah, I read that...
-
Could you show me ANYWHERE in the hunting act of 2004 where its says its illegal to take a fox on the run with a lurcher or any legislation that stipulates this please.Hunting any wild mammal with dogs is illegal unless there's a specific exemption in the Hunting Act 2004 (like there is for rats and rabbits), there's no such exemption for fox so it's illegal. Simple as that.Wrong son...its illegal to flush a wild mammal with more than 2 dogs... ie hounds.. its not illegal to be on permissioned land with a single long dog patrolling for predators in protection of stock.. fox breaks lurcher disp
-
The exemption for use of dogs below ground in the protection of birds for shooting specifically states the fox must be SHOT as soon as possible after bolting... Have you actually read the legislation? http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/37/schedule/1
-
Could you show me ANYWHERE in the hunting act of 2004 where its says its illegal to take a fox on the run with a lurcher or any legislation that stipulates this please.Hunting any wild mammal with dogs is illegal unless there's a specific exemption in the Hunting Act 2004 (like there is for rats and rabbits), there's no such exemption for fox so it's illegal. Simple as that.Wrong son...its illegal to flush a wild mammal with more than 2 dogs... ie hounds.. its not illegal to be on permissioned land with a single long dog patrolling for predators in protection of stock.. fox breaks lurcher disp
-
You know that GIF is like my kryptonite FFS. I'll be stuck wanking until my poor old chap is covered in carpet burn now :no:
-
Could you show me ANYWHERE in the hunting act of 2004 where its says its illegal to take a fox on the run with a lurcher or any legislation that stipulates this please. Hunting any wild mammal with dogs is illegal unless there's a specific exemption in the Hunting Act 2004 (like there is for rats and rabbits), there's no such exemption for fox so it's illegal. Simple as that.
-
I'm not hiding behind anything The fact you're so triggered by someone on the internet with a different opinion to you really is sad, ever thought of anger management? Silly plank.
