I think you may need to reconsider your conclusions. Once you've reviewed the logic. For instance suffering is only caused by injury.......really? The clean,swift, ethical killing of deer requires that you use bipod,cammo gear and every other accesory on the market thus reducing our carbon footprint, and thus saving our plannet........... how do you come to that conclusion?
I'm not being pedantic but by saying "only thing i know is ive never injured anything with a dog", indicates only one of two things. Like the hunter who says he never misses a shot. He's either not done very much shooti