blan89
-
Content Count
1,151 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by blan89
-
I'm always prepared when i go out alone,always take waterproofed wet and warm kit,spare knife a days food and water and 2 mobiles on different networks. It's too easy to break an ankle or get stuck to go out unprepared.
-
the hole i can see in that is,i've never know n or seen a woman of another race with a chinese man. have you? Clearly youve never been to birmingham or london then lol.Also plenty of chinese are married to british white people I'm sure there are,but i've never seen a chinese man with another race of girlfriend/wife. i don't think them having lots of male kids is them trying to pollute our gene pool.
-
Just looked on their web site going to treat myself to a pair wich ones would you recomend.atb dell you've got to get up to the factory and just try a few pairs imo different styles fit different feet better. they told me other day the have a cracking mail order service now, few simple measurements over the phone an they sort your boots, i do love going to the factory tho, always looking for excuses to go an buy new socks or wax for the boots the selection they got is impressive i got some through the mail and they just don't feel right. they're probably just trying to get
-
grammar Nazis scot,i tell ya.
-
a chained dog on a 6ft chain actually has access to 12x12ft...although thats assuming the dog has a clear run on all 4 sides... alot more room than a 8ft x 6ft run would take up...thereby debunking the adequate space theory..atb stabba That sound's good in theory but all the dog's i have seen on chain's have been treated like shite.. have you never seen a shit kennel? i've seen a few i wouldn't dream of putting my dogs in,a good chain set up is better and more hygenic imo Hygienic you mean? Lol I carnt see that mate with the dog shit every where and the chain getting draged throw
-
the hole i can see in that is,i've never know n or seen a woman of another race with a chinese man. have you?
-
a chained dog on a 6ft chain actually has access to 12x12ft...although thats assuming the dog has a clear run on all 4 sides... alot more room than a 8ft x 6ft run would take up...thereby debunking the adequate space theory..atb stabba That sound's good in theory but all the dog's i have seen on chain's have been treated like shite.. have you never seen a shit kennel? i've seen a few i wouldn't dream of putting my dogs in,a good chain set up is better and more hygenic imo
-
why? I've heard a few people say the same,but i thinks it's the best way to go,the only downside being clueless c**ts sticking their nose in and saying it's cruel for the dog. I think a dog has more freedom in a good sized run, i also think being tethered for long periods of time can alter a dogs temperament........ that would depend on the size of the run/chain,would it not? I've seen some really cramped grotty kennels. how does it alter the temperament? mine have all lived both ways,and i haven't noticed a difference,if anything they get more frustrated/pent up being in
-
Just looked on their web site going to treat myself to a pair wich ones would you recomend.atb dell you've got to get up to the factory and just try a few pairs imo different styles fit different feet better.
-
why? I've heard a few people say the same,but i thinks it's the best way to go,the only downside being clueless c**ts sticking their nose in and saying it's cruel for the dog. I think a dog has more freedom in a good sized run, i also think being tethered for long periods of time can alter a dogs temperament........ that would depend on the size of the run/chain,would it not? I've seen some really cramped grotty kennels. how does it alter the temperament? mine have all lived both ways,and i haven't noticed a difference,if anything they get more frustrated/pent up being in
-
why? I've heard a few people say the same,but i thinks it's the best way to go,the only downside being clueless c**ts sticking their nose in and saying it's cruel for the dog.
-
Really????? My kids bought me that and i thought it is quite possibly the funniest book ive ever read......... not opened it yet,but just not really my bag. i'll give it a look next time i have some spare time.
-
The alan partridge auto biography.
-
I'm curious,what part of this sentence confused you lab? So you dont think your contradicting yourself in that statemenet??........Maybe i'm still drunk from the weekend but when someone writes "Dry your eyes" on a thread where a puppy is getting roasted alive you would think they ment "stop crying about it"?...... See if i wrote "Blan your one funny sensible straight talker, aye in a f*****g pigs eye!!!!............what am i saying?.. ok mate,i'll break it down for you to understand. I don't like that sort of shit so didn't watch. (are you with me so far?) But stop bein
-
yes but he was assisting someone who did have the right to eject him,i do agree he didn't use reasonable force and should be punished accordingly. I agree he was in the wrong just not in the same way as you think,cases like this set precedent though so i hope he doesn't get charged for assault,because the next time something similar happens a judge will push it that bit further.
-
I'm curious,what part of this sentence confused you lab?
-
And what the f**k does that mean?......Are you saying you do like it?... jesus christ labradoodle. I said i was having it xmas....i'll tell you if i like it or not then. that was a joke.....just re-read it if it confuses you. Oh you were trying to be funny.................got you!!! Report card reads ......."Blan must try harder!!!"..... Your a sharp one mate,I'll give you that.
-
why not? we have the right to eject anyone from our property who is trespassing,the big fella looked to me to have permission from and be assisting an agent of the owner of that property,he was heavy handed and he should get charged for that imo but not for assault. the precedent is;can someone who is not directly involved in the incident assist in ejecting a trespasser? as far as how the case goes though i think your right.
-
And what the f**k does that mean?......Are you saying you do like it?... jesus christ labradoodle. I said i was having it xmas....i'll tell you if i like it or not then. that was a joke.....just re-read it if it confuses you.
-
That gives me an idea,i was fancying something different for xmas dinner this year. i didn't open the link because I don't like seeing dogs suffering,dry your eyes ladies
-
the lad for whatever reason was asked to leave,the 'big man' assisted an agent of the train/business owner in ejecting him. at worst he was a bit heavy handed imo If my elderly neighbor had some gobby little student refusing to leave his house when asked i'd assist in ejecting him (with permission).
-
Absolutely right.....the law should never have been prejudiced by what breed of dog you keep....law is law.....a bites a bite. " racism " is a bit of an understatement........................i think the term " genocide " would be more accurate when it came to the apbt ! i aggree but such as rotties an apbt on the rampage they kill people not like a jack russell biting some one an i think it is racism trouble is its the people not the dogs ,,, what would be a good way to legislate the breeds that can kill rather then just a pure ban ?? the laws in this country are stupid to say the least
-
get a car axle,chain and barrel/dog house. doesn't cost the earth and can travel with you. problem solved.
-
Blood testing is far more likely to detect a banned substance than urine testing is....its also far harder to beat through masking than a urine test is.....wada ( anti doping something or other ) list around 500 substances,precursors and masking agents...... their blood screening is judged in parts per billion which if i remember right the equivalent is half a teaspoon of liquid in an olympic size swimming pool....................so yes they could find steroids in dried up blood off a shoe would the blood not of degraded? That's assuming this drop was completely uncontaminated on the
-
Its only 100 % proof that somebody close to Mcllellen that night was taking steroids......was it matched to Benn,no..............have a look at some of the lumps in and around Mcllellens corner and its highly likely to have come from his own camp..... I'm no expert mate,but i don't think you can accurately test for steroids by swabbing some dried up fleck of blood on a shoe! not to mention there's nothing to say it was even from benn.
