Thats your opinion I'm referring solely to boxing btw, my opinion is that todays fighters are inferior skill wise to the previous generations I mentioned.
I've asked several times for examples of improvement in skills,so far no one has answered my question.
If your premise is correct then todays champions and contenders would beat yesteryear's would they not?
It's therefore strange that no historian or accredited boxing writer holds that viewpoint.
Wonder why that would be?
I never claimed modern boxers were technically better.
just that they're much stronger,faster,fitter