Jump to content

Flynn

Donator
  • Content Count

    1,191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Flynn

  1. Yes. We have to give it time 2 weeks I think.
  2. You and Sky Cat ( under the mantle of LAGBI ) went to a meeting @ CA. offices with Tim Bonner. You were advised to join the ALC. which was being re branded into the AWL . That has been the last word on LAGBI so far( apart from Your Go Daddy registration ) I have never been rude or unkind in any way, nor have I ever told a lie, as stated from the onset. a lie will alway be found out. I have watched You folk try and disparage everything we have achieved so far. Not even a kind word for Bradley a Young man of 14. .... We were advised the enemy lies within. I rest my cas
  3. We have not excluded any individual members however we accept it's not for everyone and we can not and will condone any actions or person whom do not conduct themselves within the ethos and values of the AWL. But you will happily turn a blind eye, under certain circumstances........... If You know of such an occasion please bring this to my attention.
  4. which rules put You off SHH? I rather think Young Bradley has out shone most.....
  5. With all due respect Fuji, You are a none conformist, I doubt a club would suit Your way of life, not the constraints of a code of conduct, enjoy Your journey.
  6. can you share with us then? that would be gloating, we just get down to the jobs in hand. No, i think that would be backing up, what you said above, how can an association that represents the working lurcher thinks its gloating to publish "the wrongs it has righted" so far, a very strange comment to make and before you start with i am biased bla, bla, you posted it and as such i am genuinely interested as to what these righted wrongs are, maybe it will swell your membership. Given the fact I am duty bound to confidentiality, what wrongs would You like to see righted?
  7. When You look back, why was Hare Coursing and Stag Hunting banned, ? I have done both, Stag Hunting by far the softest of targets to ban. Hare Coursing, did we not hear ' 5 out of 5 dog? 7 out of 7 dog? ( not me i hasten to add, just a couple of tiny tropies to My name ) did we loose sight that its the test of the dog against the Hare? the chase! Was it at that point, we shot ourselves in the foot, spouting our dogs kills? maybe or maybe not, but i often question that fact, sadly whatever You think Hare Coursing was banned more than likely because it too was a soft target. But
  8. can you share with us then? that would be gloating, we just get down to the jobs in hand.
  9. Thank for the heads up Francie, i will watch it on the i player , and take it from there. The AWL has thus far righted many wrongs, to date. What we find is folk standing on the side lines , telling us what to do, yet failing to take part in what we do. A bit like clapping on the troops as they march into battle. This is not aimed at any one in particular, just an observation. For those who have joined us, and others that have just donated we thank You.
  10. For those of You who complained to Of Com. i spoke with them on the phone yesterday, I was advised that Of Com would not deal with this complaint, the woman in the office sent me the the BBC Trust , I spoke to a Gent there , who took my complaint and lodged it. He then went on to say , please also fill in the form on the web site. bbc.co.uk/complaints They certainly make complaining as difficult as possible.! IF You still very strongly about it, i urge You to follow this route. To the family involved, be sure You have spoken with Clive Reece.
  11. By now all those who bothered to e mail the one show, will have an auto reply. I suggest If You wish to take this further, You follow Giro,s suggestion, using Of Com, this must be done withing 30 days of the programme. being aired. As to the use of social media, more and more people will gravitate towards using it, it's very much is the case of using common sence, while common sence is not that common any more, good will always prevail. The Police monitor it heavily. So i urge You to think what You post and where you post it. The fight for the repeal is ongoing among the politi
  12. if any one esle wishes to write to the one show, the e mail address is theoneshow@bbc.co.uk
  13. Statement : from the AWL. How one sided The item on “the one show” showed a very one sided view of working Terrier and Lurcher/longdog owners. There are many thousands of law abiding owners of these wonderful working dogs. Many are members of their respective governing bodies., The National Working Terrier federation (NWT) and the Association for the working Lurcher/Longdog (AWL) Speaking as Chairman of the A.W.L. we impose a strict code of conduct for our members and as an association we are answerable to our governing body the Council of Hunting associations (CHA) Many Lurcher,
  14. thats how pups should look in that top pic,tip top You too could have a dog like that........ oh wait You did .... Ive got her sister how intersting
  15. thats how pups should look in that top pic,tip top You too could have a dog like that........ oh wait You did ....
  16. Goodness how old is Tigger now?
  17. It is what it is DB , the law is the law, You can ask the CA their stance, its up to You. the AWL as You so rightly pointed out is govened by the COHA , to which we are accountable. We can only promote legal lurcher work. On a day to day basis, issues come to our door, which we act on where needed or dont ,its that simple, but when the every day Lurcer man/ woman , cannot step out of his door, without being hounded, then its a much bigger problem , one we cannot fail to address, and Your connstant nit picking fuels the *IN* house problem that the Lurcher faces. I had thought
  18. are you mad travellers always get harsher side of law. any excuse for police to enter sites and they will. and courts ALWAYS give higher sentences to travellers. i know alot of sites that earn honest livings. good and bad in all walks of life but to blame the whole ban situation on travellers bit below the belt. just like how dog men shouldnt all be tarred travellers shouldnt either. If You care to re read i chose my word carefully. There are many a TRUE Romany who are honest as the day is long.
  19. It is my opinion ( please note MY ) that the ban has led to more poaching then ever, there are a certain few who have chosen to carry on regardless, they are taking stupid fines , ie~ Motor offences etc, but these die hards are falling foul of those that wont be touched by the justice sytstem as the Law enforcers wont enter their camps!, these vagabonds should be ousted as they are the lowest of the low... they are the ones driving over farmers land, using threatning behaviour etc. BUT they appear to be unstopable quite happy are they to dump thier dogs, or even run them over, leaving the dog
  20. http://www.awll.co.uk/wp/2016/02/25/439/ ​ Be sure to check this out Many thanks to the Hosts and Mr Tim Bonner AWL#lurcherworkatitsfinest.
  21. Might add the AWL is here for Legal Lurcher work as is the CA. none the less, I am in communication with Mr Bonner.
  22. I haven't seen the full report, only a clip off the web. i have read the Anti comments below it. All is in hand Ken, i knew this was going public prior. to its release. One can never buy into media Hype.
  23. Sadly this is true reflection of changing times, we need to protect the working lurchers and for future generations, hence i was passion driven to drive forward the AWL , as I have stated before many times, if we dont pick up the gauntlet and run with it, the lurcher ( as we know it ) will become nothing more then a mongrel , 11 years since the ban has passed, we will NEVER get another chance NOW for at best a full repeal, or amendmant . It is a very slow process, however exciting things are coming soon. Many thanks to those of You who saw the same vision as we did and joined the AWL.
×
×
  • Create New...