Jump to content

beevan3468

Members
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About beevan3468

  • Rank
    Newbie
  • Birthday 14/12/1968

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Northern Ireland
  1. Impressive stuff you've just confirmed that the .204 is what i'm after, yes i totally agree ammo is expensive but hopefully if the round gets more popular the price may come down. Still waiting on the grant to come through its only been 4 months they're abit slow in my neck of the woods! Will let you know how i got on but thanks for your replyhttp://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif
  2. Thanks for the replies, I've went for this cal as I intend to use it on corvids at longer ranges than my rimfire would be capable of, I've considered the 17 hmr and 17 rem but it gets very windy on my patch and I feel the 204 covers both of these problems as it doesn't be as affected as much as the 17's. It will also be used on the odd fox at sensible ranges, a 222 or 223 in my view would be overkill 'excuse the pun' for my job. Maybe I'm wrong anyone like to point me in the right direction, ammo can be sourced locally as this cal seems to be gaining abit of popularity!
  3. Hello All, Any sugestions of which make of rifle in 204 ruger cal to go for, I'm a southpaw but I've heard Tikka and other well known makes cater for lefties?
×
×
  • Create New...