30mpg on a 2.5 petrol?! That's impressive.
I'd need a long wheel base though... It's the only way I could get 300miles of extension cord in to run my computer.
Hawks were fairly low powered and still are compared to modern rifles.
How much would you be prepared to spend on a rifle set up?
If you want to take live quarry with a rifle it's only fair to use a rifle running at least 12ft/lbs. Of course anything higher powered than that would require a firearms certificate.
I'm not missing any point. If we want to try and change the law we have to use their political methods. If people want to donate to the CA then fine they'll pursue their own agenda. Your agenda begins and ends at the ballot box.
If you don't want to do that then that's entirely upto you but in the time it's taken to write a post on this forum you could've sent a brief letter to your local MP. The law will stand until it's changed or ammended.
I'm on first name terms with my local MP. She's gone from ranting to polite correspondence. I know I can't change her bigotted viewpoint but I do
I don't think there is a man or woman here that trusts a politician. This is the chance we take though. If we want a repeal or an ammendment we have to join the political process and vote on that wish. This way we have a chance at a change in the law. If we don't vote nothing will happen at all. Our opponents do vote. They use the political process because they're dedicated and they know we're half arsed at best. They're all ready to hand in a petition to ban snaring and are lobbying their MP's for a change in the law. Who here is lobbying their MP to keep snaring as a legitimate form of pest
Whether the tories will or won't is open to speculation. They can't decide what they want for themselves yet.
We have to be in it to win it so we either send a 30 second email to each of the candidates asking their stance on hunting or we don't do anything at all.
A vote could see a change. Doing f**k all certainly won't. I mean how many people are aware that LACS are in the process of bringing a second hunting prosecution forward?
I'd rather main stream publications like Private Eye were bringing it to the attention of the public, than the piss poor attempts from the CMW (supposed
I locked it because you bumped 3 times in 2 days. The whole thread has been bumped 7 times since you started.
If he reads the classifieds he ain't going to miss it is he?
If I pin it to the top of the classifieds section will you stop whinging?
http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/index.php?showforum=16
Didn't want to hijack the thread with the baby being killed, as it's not the place, but have a read of this article...
Link To The BBC: Rottweilers, dog control and the law
Are we going to see further action against dog ownership?